Container and Kubernetes security for small business buyers
Asked as “container security platform”, and as “Kubernetes security tool”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 67 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
22%
Contested · Kubescape 19%
22Trivy19Kubescape19Snyk Container39others
22% of first choices, contested.
Since September 2026↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: Snyk Container (21%) replaces Trivy (28% then, 19% now), 2 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.Snyk Container leads at 21%, replacing Trivy, which led at 28% and stands at 19% now: 2 points clear, inside the floor, so the swap reads as unsettled.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Trivy22%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: Snyk Container (21%) replaces Trivy (28% then, 19% now), 2 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.This pageMid-marketTrivy22%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: Trivy (22%) replaces Sysdig Secure (29% then, 18% now), 4 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.Standing →Enterprise
Prisma Cloud25%Contested▼−4Since September 2026: 29% → 25%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →
Trivy22%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: Snyk Container (21%) replaces Trivy (28% then, 19% now), 2 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.This pageMid-marketTrivy22%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: Trivy (22%) replaces Sysdig Secure (29% then, 18% now), 4 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.Standing →EnterprisePrisma Cloud25%Contested▼−4Since September 2026: 29% → 25%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01Trivy22%7%59accepted challenger▼−9Since September 2026: 28% → 19%, −9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.28% → 19%
Trivy22%7%59accepted challenger▼−9Since September 2026: 28% → 19%, −9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.28% → 19%02
Snyk Container19%4%49accepted challenger▲+7Since September 2026: 14% → 21%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.14% → 21%
Snyk Container19%4%49accepted challenger▲+7Since September 2026: 14% → 21%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.14% → 21%03
Kubescape19%0%36accepted challenger▼−6Since September 2026: 23% → 18%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.23% → 18%
Kubescape19%0%36accepted challenger▼−6Since September 2026: 23% → 18%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.23% → 18%04
Falco12%11%46accepted challenger▼−10Since September 2026: 22% → 12%, −10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.22% → 12%
Falco12%11%46accepted challenger▼−10Since September 2026: 22% → 12%, −10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.22% → 12%05
Sysdig Secure6%36%50criticized challenger▲+5Since September 2026: 2% → 7%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 7%
Sysdig Secure6%36%50criticized challenger▲+5Since September 2026: 2% → 7%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 7%06
Wiz4%38%16criticized challenger▲+5Since September 2026: 0% → 5%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 5%
Wiz4%38%16criticized challenger▲+5Since September 2026: 0% → 5%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 5%07
Aikido Security3%0%17accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 4%
Aikido Security3%0%17accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 4%08
Microsoft Defender for Cloud3%43%14criticized challenger▼−1Since September 2026: 3% → 2%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.3% → 2%
Microsoft Defender for Cloud3%43%14criticized challenger▼−1Since September 2026: 3% → 2%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.3% → 2%09
SUSE NeuVector1%0%11accepted challenger▼−1Since September 2026: 3% → 2%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.3% → 2%
SUSE NeuVector1%0%11accepted challenger▼−1Since September 2026: 3% → 2%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.3% → 2%10
Orca Security1%18%11accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%
Orca Security1%18%11accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%11
Aqua Security1%45%51criticized challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%
Aqua Security1%45%51criticized challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%12Prisma Cloud1%61%36criticized challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%
Prisma Cloud1%61%36criticized challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%Show the two products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
14
Anchore0%8%12accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Anchore0%8%12accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%13
Calico0%0%10accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%
Calico0%0%10accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Trivy vs Aqua SecurityTrivy vs WizTrivy vs Snyk ContainerTrivy vs Orca SecuritySysdig Secure vs FalcoSysdig Secure vs KubescapeSysdig Secure vs Aqua SecuritySysdig Secure vs WizSysdig Secure vs Snyk ContainerSysdig Secure vs Orca SecurityFalco vs KubescapeFalco vs Aqua SecurityFalco vs WizFalco vs Snyk ContainerFalco vs Orca SecurityKubescape vs Aqua SecurityKubescape vs WizKubescape vs Snyk ContainerKubescape vs Orca SecurityAqua Security vs WizAqua Security vs Snyk ContainerAqua Security vs Orca SecurityWiz vs Snyk ContainerWiz vs Orca SecuritySnyk Container vs Orca Security
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
0102030405060708091011121314Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01Trivy22%
Trivy22%02Snyk Container19%
Snyk Container19%03Kubescape19%
Kubescape19%04Falco12%
Falco12%05Sysdig Secure6%
Sysdig Secure6%06Wiz4%
Wiz4%07Aikido Security3%
Aikido Security3%08Microsoft Defender for Cloud3%
Microsoft Defender for Cloud3%09SUSE NeuVector1%
SUSE NeuVector1%10Orca Security1%
Orca Security1%11Aqua Security1%
Aqua Security1%12Prisma Cloud1%
Prisma Cloud1%13Calico0%
Calico0%14Anchore0%
Anchore0%What they warned about
Zero of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.1 Fast, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Aqua Security45%
23 of 51 labels negative · 11 of 14 models · 6 hard negative
“Examples to Avoid/Caution: **Prisma Cloud (Palo Alto Networks)**, **Aqua Security**, and **Sysdig Secure**.” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt
Sysdig Secure36%
18 of 50 labels negative · 11 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Examples to Avoid/Caution: **Prisma Cloud (Palo Alto Networks)**, **Aqua Security**, and **Sysdig Secure**.” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt
Prisma Cloud61%
22 of 36 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 7 hard negative
“**Why to avoid:** ... enterprise-focused, expensive (custom quote only), complex to configure**, and has a steep learning curve.” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
Microsoft Defender for Cloud43%
6 of 14 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“small-business feedback often points to cost, setup complexity, and usability challenges” GPT-5.4 mini, negative prompt
What they cite
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.
Sites the answers cite
74 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1007 links across 186 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 6 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · CyberPress54 answers · 89 citations · 12 models
36 answers · 36 citations · 11 models
35 answers · 40 citations · 12 models
vendor site · G233 answers · 55 citations · 12 models
33 answers · 33 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Portainer27 answers · 28 citations · 10 models
26 answers · 26 citations · 10 models
22 answers · 33 citations · 11 models
20 answers · 20 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Checkmarx18 answers · 24 citations · 9 models
vendor site · SentinelOne17 answers · 30 citations · 7 models
17 answers · 21 citations · 9 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
41 answers · 12 models
36 answers · 11 models
33 answers · 12 models
30 answers · 12 models
26 answers · 10 models
22 answers · 9 models
20 answers · 10 models
18 answers · 8 models
17 answers · 11 models
15 answers · 8 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best container security platform”, “container security platform”, “container security platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trivy trivy.dev | 22% | 207 | 5,400 | 182 | 3,093 | |||
| Snyk snyk.io Snyk Container 19% | 19% | 109 | 12,100 | 581 | 61,651 company | 60 | ||
| Kubescape kubescape.io | 19% | 75 | 260 | 1 | 150 | |||
| Falco falco.org | 12% | 101 | 27,100 | 4,242 | 383 | |||
| Sysdig Secure sysdig.com | 6% | 256 | 110 | 2 | 50,599 | $1,067 | 4 | 9 |
| Wiz wiz.io | 4% | 688 | 40,500 | 16,751 | 102,573 | $6,856 | 120 | 3 |
| Aikido aikido.dev Aikido Security 3% | 3% | 342 | 2,400 | 51 | 6,442 company | $936 | 120 | |
| Microsoft Defender microsoft.com Microsoft Defender for Cloud 3% | 3% | 569 | 18,100 | 3,525 | 145,358,109 company | $12,455 | 103 | |
| SUSE NeuVector suse.com | 1% | 32 | 20 | 0 | 59,615 | 103 | 9 | |
| Orca Security orca.security | 1% | 401 | 1,900 | 103 | 125,483 | $441 | 27 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 20 sites; 2 of them are among the sites the models cited here (checkmarx.com, sentinelone.com). The first result for “best container security platform” is guptadeepak.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best container security platform for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which Kubernetes security tool would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top container security platforms for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best container security platform for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating a container security platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which container security platforms should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Snyk ContainerKubescapeChangedDocker Scout, Trivyagainst: Aqua Security, Sysdig SecureTrivyno first choiceagainst: Anchore, Check Point CloudGuard, Prisma Cloud, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes, Trivy
Two alternatives
Sysdig Secure, WizThree alternatives
Aqua Security, Calico, FalcoThree alternatives
Falco, Orca Security, WizFour alternatives
Aikido Security, Falco, SUSE NeuVector, Snyk ContainerGPT-5.4 miniSysdig SecureKyvernoChangedSnyk ContainerFalco, Trivyagainst: Sysdig Secureno first choiceagainst: Calico Cloud, Check Point CloudGuard, CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, FortiCNAPP, Microsoft Defender for Cloud
Two alternatives
Aikido Security, Microsoft Defender for CloudTwo alternatives
Falco, TrivyThree alternatives
Chainguard, Sysdig Secure, TrivyGemini 3.5 FlashSnyk Containeragainst: Prisma Cloud, Sysdig Secure, WizKubescapeChangedagainst: Prisma Cloud, WizTrivyagainst: FalcoAikido Security, SUSE NeuVectoragainst: Prisma Cloud, Sysdig Secure, WizAikido Securityagainst: Harbor, Orca Security, Snyk Container, Wizagainst: Aqua Security, CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Prisma Cloud, Sysdig Secure, Wiz
Three alternatives
Aikido Security, Docker Scout, TrivyOne alternative
TrivyThree alternatives
ARMO Platform, Aikido Security, Snyk ContainerFive alternatives
Amazon GuardDuty, Docker Scout, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Snyk Container, TrivyFour alternatives
AWS Inspector, GCP Container Analysis, Jit, PlexicusPerplexity SonarMicrosoft Defender for CloudKubescapeChangedTrivyFalco, Trivyno first choiceagainst: Aqua Security, JFrog Xray, Prisma Cloud, Qualys Container Security, Sysdig Secure, Tenable container security offerings
Four alternatives
Falco, Kubescape, Trivy, WizThree alternatives
Aqua Security, Falco, Prisma CloudFive alternatives
Aikido Security, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Snyk Container, Sysdig Secure, WizFour alternatives
Aikido Security, Cloudanix, Google Cloud Container Security, KubescapeGrok 4.1 FastSnyk ContainerKubescapeChangedSnyk Containeragainst: Prisma CloudTrivyagainst: Qualys, Snyk Container, Sysdig SecureSnyk Containeragainst: Aqua Security, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Prisma Cloud, Sysdig Secure
Five alternatives
Aqua Security, Falco, Kubescape, Sysdig Secure, TrivyThree alternatives
Aqua Security, Falco, Sysdig SecureFive alternatives
Aqua Security, Falco, Kubescape, Sysdig Secure, TrivyFour alternatives
Falco, Harbor, Kubescape, SUSE NeuVectorSeven alternatives
Aqua Security, Datadog Cloud Security Management, Falco, Orca Security, Prisma Cloud, Sysdig Secure, TrivyMistral SmallAqua Security, Sysdig Secureno first choiceChangedFalco, TrivyTrivyno first choiceagainst: Falco, Trivynothing named
One alternative
Snyk ContainerTwo alternatives
Aqua Security, Snyk ContainerFour alternatives
Calico, Falco, Kubescape, SUSE NeuVectorDeepSeek V4 FlashSnyk Containeragainst: Aqua Security, Prisma CloudKubescapeChangedSnyk Container, TrivyFalco, Kubescape, TrivySnyk Container, Wizagainst: Aqua Security, Prisma Cloud, Sysdig Secureagainst: Anchore Engine, Aqua Security, Clair, CrowdStrike Falcon, Orca Security, Prisma Cloud, Sysdig Secure, Wiz
Four alternatives
Anchore, Falco, Grype, TrivyFour alternatives
Aqua Security, Falco, Sysdig Secure, TrivyFour alternatives
Anchore, Aqua Security, Grype, Sysdig SecureTwo alternatives
Harbor, Snyk ContainerFour alternatives
Falco, Kubescape, Orca Security, TrivyLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceFalco, KubescapeChangedno first choiceTrivyno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Anchore, Aqua SecurityFive alternatives
Anchore’s Grype/Syft, Calico, Falco, Harbor, KubescapeQwen 3.7 FlashSnyk Containeragainst: Aqua Security, Prisma CloudFalco, KubescapeChangedSnyk ContainerFalco, Trivyagainst: Aqua Security, Prisma CloudGrype, Prisma Cloud, Snyk Container, Sysdig Secure, Wizagainst: Aqua Security, Falco, Trend Micro (Trend) Container Securityagainst: AWS Security Hub, Aqua Security, Clair, Falco, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Open Policy Agent, Prisma Cloud, Sysdig Secure, Trivy
Two alternatives
Docker Scout, TrivyTwo alternatives
Aqua Security, Sysdig SecureThree alternatives
Anchore Engine, Sysdig Secure, Warden.ioTwo alternatives
Kubescape, Snyk ContainerKimi K2Snyk Containeragainst: Aqua Security, Prisma CloudKubescapeChangedagainst: Aqua Security, Prisma CloudSnyk Container, TrivyTrivyLacework, Orca Security, Snyk Container, Wizagainst: Aqua Security, Falco, Grype, Prisma Cloud, Sysdig Secure, Trivyagainst: Alert Logic, Aqua Security, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Prisma Cloud, Qualys Container Security, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes, Sysdig Secure
One alternative
TrivyTwo alternatives
Falco, TrivyFour alternatives
Anchore, Chainguard, Docker Scout, Sysdig SecureThree alternatives
Docker Bench, Falco, Snyk ContainerGLM 4.7 FlashXSnyk ContainerKubescapeChangedagainst: Aqua Security, Sysdig SecureTrivyagainst: Aqua Security, Sysdig SecureTrivySysdig Securenothing named
Two alternatives
Sysdig Secure, TrivyTwo alternatives
Falco, TrivyTwo alternatives
Chainguard, Snyk ContainerFive alternatives
Cosign, Falco, Kubescape, SUSE NeuVector, Snyk ContainerFour alternatives
Aikido Security, Chainguard, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Orca SecurityMiniMax M2.5Snyk ContainerFalcoChangedSnyk Containeragainst: Aqua SecurityTrivyno first choiceagainst: Aqua Security, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Portainer, Prisma Cloud
Three alternatives
Aqua Security, Qualys Container Security, TrivySix alternatives
Aqua Security, Kubescape, Kyverno, Prisma Cloud, Sysdig Secure, kube‑benchThree alternatives
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes, Sysdig Secure, TrivyFour alternatives
Falco, Harbor, Kubescape, SUSE NeuVectorGPT-6 LunaSnyk ContainerKubescapeChangedAikido Security, Snyk Containeragainst: Aqua Security, Prisma CloudTrivyno first choiceagainst: Aqua Security, Rapid7 InsightVM's Container Security feature, Sysdig Secure, Tenable Legacy Container Security
Two alternatives
Google Artifact Analysis, Sysdig SecureOne alternative
TrivySix alternatives
Docker Scout, Microsoft Defender for Containers, Orca Security, Sysdig Secure, Trivy, WizThree alternatives
Docker Scout, GitLab, Snyk ContainerMuse Glimmer 30BFalco, Kubescape, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, TrivyKubescapeChangedSnyk Container, TrivyTrivyagainst: Aqua Security, Prisma Cloud, Rapid7 InsightVM, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes, Sysdig SecureTrivyagainst: Aqua Security, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Prisma Cloud, Sysdig Secure
Four alternatives
Aqua Security, Orca Security, Snyk Container, Sysdig SecureThree alternatives
Aqua Security, Falco, Prisma CloudTwo alternatives
Aqua Security, Docker ScoutSeven alternatives
Anchore’s Grype/Syft, Calico, Docker Scout, Falco, Harbor, Kubescape, Snyk ContainerFour alternatives
Aqua Security, Calico, Falco, KubescapeBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 11:13 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 13:03 | yes | 2 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 11:37 | yes | 20 | 23 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 13:49 | yes | 22 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 07:54 | yes | 21 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 11:52 | yes | 12 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 07:56 | yes | 22 | 33 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:48 | yes | 8 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 11:02 | no | 0 | 26 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 12:24 | yes | 19 | 18 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 12:57 | yes | 24 | 48 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 08:27 | yes | 14 | 34 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 12:29 | yes | 3 | 12 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 10:07 | yes | 13 | 17 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 07:27 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 10:30 | yes | 2 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 12:53 | yes | 11 | 21 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 07:47 | yes | 21 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 11:40 | yes | 19 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 12:44 | no | 0 | 1 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 13:18 | yes | 20 | 30 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 08:00 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 07:40 | yes | 5 | 43 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 10:23 | yes | 19 | 29 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 13:53 | yes | 22 | 110 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:52 | no | 0 | 33 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 07:47 | yes | 2 | 24 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 12:00 | yes | 10 | 22 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 07:47 | yes | 9 | 9 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 08:49 | yes | 7 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 13:08 | yes | 18 | 29 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 11:46 | yes | 23 | 5 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 11:44 | yes | 23 | 11 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 08:34 | yes | 7 | 8 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 11:05 | yes | 25 | 48 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 09:02 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 12:58 | no | 0 | 39 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:05 | yes | 19 | 33 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 11:24 | yes | 22 | 49 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 11:40 | yes | 25 | 41 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 09:44 | yes | 7 | 19 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 09:47 | yes | 15 | 33 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:11 | yes | 9 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:44 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 10:09 | yes | 12 | 23 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:06 | yes | 22 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 13:38 | yes | 14 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 11:21 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 08:15 | yes | 18 | 26 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:55 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 11:33 | yes | 10 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:06 | yes | 19 | 24 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 10:47 | yes | 13 | 51 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 13:43 | yes | 14 | 29 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 09:14 | yes | 5 | 14 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 13:08 | yes | 11 | 40 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 11:50 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 12:17 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 08:43 | yes | 15 | 28 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 12:08 | yes | 18 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 09:34 | yes | 18 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 09:06 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:43 | yes | 21 | 49 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 08:07 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 13:25 | no | 0 | 26 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 10:11 | no | 0 | 26 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:13 | yes | 16 | 23 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 12:47 | yes | 5 | 15 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 12:49 | yes | 3 | 16 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 08:52 | yes | 14 | 20 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 10:14 | yes | 16 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 13:43 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 09:07 | yes | 17 | 27 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 11:55 | yes | 24 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 09:26 | yes | 18 | 28 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:23 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 11:09 | yes | 24 | 42 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 12:29 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 13:38 | no | 0 | 32 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 12:48 | yes | 21 | 26 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:35 | yes | 17 | 49 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 11:46 | yes | 22 | 31 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 09:36 | yes | 3 | 18 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 09:37 | yes | 16 | 25 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Aikido read as Aikido Security
Aqua read as Aqua Security
Aqua Platform read as Aqua Security
Datadog read as Datadog Cloud Security Management
Microsoft Defender read as Microsoft Defender for Containers
Orca read as Orca Security
Rapid7 read as Rapid7 InsightVM
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security read as Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security (RHACS) read as Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes
SentinelOne read as SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security
Snyk read as Snyk Container
Snyk (Container Security) read as Snyk Container
Snyk (Free Tier) read as Snyk Container
Snyk Team read as Snyk Container
Sysdig read as Sysdig Secure
Trend Micro read as Trend Micro (Trend) Container Security
Unresolved, counted raw
Amazon GuardDuty for ECS/EKS
Calico Cloud
Datadog Cloud Security Platform
Docker Bench
GCP Container Analysis
GitLab's built-in scanning
Google Artifact Analysis
Quay's Clair
Rapid7 InsightVM's Container Security feature
Tenable Legacy Container Security
Tenable container security offerings
Warden.io
kube‑bench
kube‑hunter
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.