AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Falco · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Ranked

Falco

113Judge labels
17First choices
12Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
15% in Container security for mid-market buyers
Rank 3 of 77 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 5% of its 39 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Falco →
By buyer segmentStrongest at mid-market.
In container security · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Falco for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Container and Kubernetes securityCloud and infrastructure15%3 of 775%39accepted challenger▲+6Since September 2026: 10% → 16%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Cloud-native application protectionCloud and infrastructure0%20 of 700%3under 10 labels · led by Wiz at 37%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Falco held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · Container security · by segment

Small business▼−10Since September 2026: 22% → 12%, −10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
12%from 22% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 1 pointRank 3 → 4 of 66
Mid-market▲+6Since September 2026: 10% → 16%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
16%from 10% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 5 pointsRank 4 → 3 of 68
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 11 → 17 of 71

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Container security10%16%▲+6Since September 2026: 10% → 16%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 4 → 3 of 77
CNAPP0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 10 → 20 of 70

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Falco across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.520114
GPT-5.4 mini01001
Gemini 3.5 Flash02204
Perplexity Sonar02103
Grok 4.2012216
Mistral Small00101
DeepSeek V4 Flash12205
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash21003
Kimi K212104
GLM 4.7 FlashX12003
MiniMax M2.502103
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B14005

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct12 labels1
Paraphrase30 labels6
Comparative14 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained26 labels9
Scale-constrained12 labels1
Negative19 labels2not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative113 labels in all, every segment counted; 17 of the 20 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Start with Trivy (for scanning vulnerabilities) and Falco (for runtime defense)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Container security · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Start with Kubescape + Falco (Free/Open Source), then evaluate paid upgrades” Kimi K2 · Container security · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“For the tightest budget, Trivy or Falco are excellent free options.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Container security · budget prompt · first choice
“Falco as the CNCF-graduated default for runtime detection” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Container security · paraphrase prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Falco by itself does not connect runtime events back to the builds or images responsible, requires tuning to reduce noise and avoid false positives” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Container security · negative prompt · soft negative
“Falco (runtime)...but layer with commercial for scale/support.” Grok 4.20 · Container security · scale prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Falco, over the 113 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Falco was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Trivy89 of 11320Compare →
Prisma Cloud70 of 1137Not among the top eight
Wiz36 of 11311Compare →
Microsoft Defender for Cloud26 of 1137Not among the top eight
SUSE NeuVector25 of 1131Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Falco. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 101 of the 113 answers that named Falco and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cyberpress.org78
gbhackers.com57
portainer.io54
esecurityplanet.com42
g2.com42
thectoclub.com41
cybersecuritynews.com40
expertinsights.com37
itechguides.com31
appsecsanta.com30

452 of the 452 domain citations in answers naming Falco came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

falco.org is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Falco takes 15% of first choices and Trivy takes 22%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “container security platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “container security platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
27,100 a month (“falco”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
4,242 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 383 a month
Searches its site ranks for
134 · 18 in the top three
Sites linking to it
2,008
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
15%
rank 3 of 77 in container security
Segment leader
22%
Trivy
First choices
17 across its categories
Named in
113 answers
Its own site cited
in 101 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on falco.org
337
subdomains included
Content
162
counted in the table below
Documentation
82
Product · Integration
0 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog15812026-09-21SOAR
Case study3undated
Glossary or explainer1undated

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page falco.org exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read October 5, 2026.

Names read as Falco

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Falco; a claim can dispute any of them.
Falco (CNCF-graduated) 1

Follow Falco

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Falco's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Falco, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Falco by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Falco is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Falco, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at falco.org is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.

Badges

Wins only: a badge exists where Falco is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHide

Falco is among the products AI models recommend first in Container and Kubernetes security this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.

Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Among AI models' top three in Container and Kubernetes security, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://it-ai-index.com/cloud/container-and-kubernetes-security/"><img src="https://it-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/falco--container-and-kubernetes-security-wide.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Container and Kubernetes security, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index" width="320" height="104"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Container and Kubernetes security standing, where the claim can be checked.

Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Among AI models' top three in Container and Kubernetes security, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://it-ai-index.com/cloud/container-and-kubernetes-security/"><img src="https://it-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/falco--container-and-kubernetes-security-square.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Container and Kubernetes security, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index" width="240" height="240"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Container and Kubernetes security standing, where the claim can be checked.

Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Among AI models' top three in Container and Kubernetes security, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://it-ai-index.com/cloud/container-and-kubernetes-security/"><img src="https://it-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/falco--container-and-kubernetes-security-compact.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Container and Kubernetes security, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index" width="200" height="56"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Container and Kubernetes security standing, where the claim can be checked.

Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.