Container and Kubernetes security for enterprise buyers
Asked as “container security platform”, and as “Kubernetes security tool”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 55 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
25%
Contested · Aqua Security 22%
25Prisma Cloud22Aqua Security22Sysdig Secure31others
25% of first choices, contested.
Since September 2026▲+1Since September 2026: 24% → 25%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Prisma Cloud held the lead, +1 point on 24%, inside the 11-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Trivy22%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: Snyk Container (21%) replaces Trivy (28% then, 19% now), 2 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.Standing →Mid-marketTrivy22%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: Trivy (22%) replaces Sysdig Secure (29% then, 18% now), 4 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.Standing →Enterprise
Prisma Cloud25%Contested▼−4Since September 2026: 29% → 25%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This page
Trivy22%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: Snyk Container (21%) replaces Trivy (28% then, 19% now), 2 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.Standing →Mid-marketTrivy22%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: Trivy (22%) replaces Sysdig Secure (29% then, 18% now), 4 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.Standing →EnterprisePrisma Cloud25%Contested▼−4Since September 2026: 29% → 25%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageThe standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01Prisma Cloud25%19%69accepted challenger▲+1Since September 2026: 24% → 25%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.24% → 25%
Prisma Cloud25%19%69accepted challenger▲+1Since September 2026: 24% → 25%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.24% → 25%02
Sysdig Secure22%8%65accepted challenger▲+3Since September 2026: 16% → 19%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.16% → 19%
Sysdig Secure22%8%65accepted challenger▲+3Since September 2026: 16% → 19%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.16% → 19%03
Aqua Security22%12%65accepted challenger▼−4Since September 2026: 29% → 25%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.29% → 25%
Aqua Security22%12%65accepted challenger▼−4Since September 2026: 29% → 25%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.29% → 25%04
Wiz5%8%38accepted challenger▼−13Since September 2026: 20% → 6%, −13 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.20% → 6%
Wiz5%8%38accepted challenger▼−13Since September 2026: 20% → 6%, −13 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.20% → 6%05
Snyk Container4%25%32criticized challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 2%
Snyk Container4%25%32criticized challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 2%06
Orca Security4%0%13accepted challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 4%
Orca Security4%0%13accepted challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 4%07
Microsoft Defender for Cloud2%9%11accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%
Microsoft Defender for Cloud2%9%11accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%08
Anchore2%27%15criticized challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%
Anchore2%27%15criticized challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%Show the two products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
10Trivy0%39%18criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Trivy0%39%18criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%09
Falco0%28%18criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Falco0%28%18criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Trivy vs Aqua SecurityTrivy vs WizTrivy vs Snyk ContainerTrivy vs Orca SecuritySysdig Secure vs FalcoSysdig Secure vs KubescapeSysdig Secure vs Aqua SecuritySysdig Secure vs WizSysdig Secure vs Snyk ContainerSysdig Secure vs Orca SecurityFalco vs KubescapeFalco vs Aqua SecurityFalco vs WizFalco vs Snyk ContainerFalco vs Orca SecurityKubescape vs Aqua SecurityKubescape vs WizKubescape vs Snyk ContainerKubescape vs Orca SecurityAqua Security vs WizAqua Security vs Snyk ContainerAqua Security vs Orca SecurityWiz vs Snyk ContainerWiz vs Orca SecuritySnyk Container vs Orca Security
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01020304050607080910Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01Prisma Cloud25%
Prisma Cloud25%02Sysdig Secure22%
Sysdig Secure22%03Aqua Security22%
Aqua Security22%04Wiz5%
Wiz5%05Snyk Container4%
Snyk Container4%06Orca Security4%
Orca Security4%07Microsoft Defender for Cloud2%
Microsoft Defender for Cloud2%08Anchore2%
Anchore2%09Falco0%
Falco0%10Trivy0%
Trivy0%What they warned about
Seven of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Grok 4.1 Fast, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick and Kimi K2 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Prisma Cloud19%
13 of 69 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Avoid credit-based, quote-led platforms (Prisma Cloud, Wiz, Aqua)” DeepSeek V4 Flash, budget prompt
Aqua Security12%
8 of 65 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Avoid Aqua if predictable TCO is your top priority — their opaque, per-workload pricing and lack of published rates make budgeting difficult at scale.” Kimi K2, budget prompt
Snyk Container25%
8 of 32 labels negative · 6 of 14 models
“While excellent for shift-left security, it has limited runtime protection. Better suited for developer teams than comprehensive enterprise security.” Kimi K2, negative prompt
Trivy39%
7 of 18 labels negative · 6 of 14 models
“While excellent for vulnerability scanning, it has no centralized dashboard, limited runtime protection... Enterprises need unified platforms, not point solutions.” Kimi K2, negative prompt
What they cite
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.
Sites the answers cite
75 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1092 links across 233 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 6 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · CyberPress40 answers · 57 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Portainer33 answers · 36 citations · 11 models
32 answers · 32 citations · 11 models
27 answers · 35 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Checkmarx27 answers · 31 citations · 9 models
27 answers · 27 citations · 10 models
vendor site · OX25 answers · 30 citations · 10 models
23 answers · 27 citations · 10 models
vendor site · SentinelOne20 answers · 38 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Tigera18 answers · 23 citations · 11 models
18 answers · 19 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Orca16 answers · 18 citations · 8 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
31 answers · 10 models
27 answers · 10 models
23 answers · 10 models
22 answers · 9 models
22 answers · 11 models
21 answers · 9 models
21 answers · 8 models
19 answers · 9 models
16 answers · 9 models
16 answers · 9 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best container security platform”, “container security platform”, “container security platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prisma prismacloud.io Prisma Cloud 25% | 25% | 475 | 1,300 | 97 | 2,039 | |||
| Sysdig Secure sysdig.com | 22% | 256 | 110 | 2 | 50,599 | $1,067 | 4 | 9 |
| Aqua aquasec.com Aqua Security 22% | 22% | 199 | 880 | 32 | 7,831 company | 0 | 2 | |
| Wiz wiz.io | 5% | 688 | 40,500 | 16,751 | 102,573 | $6,856 | 120 | 3 |
| Docker Business docker.com | 5% | 5 | 1,141,297 | 16 | ||||
| Snyk snyk.io Snyk Container 4% | 4% | 109 | 12,100 | 581 | 61,651 company | 60 | ||
| Orca Security orca.security | 4% | 401 | 1,900 | 103 | 125,483 | $441 | 27 | |
| Microsoft Defender microsoft.com Microsoft Defender for Cloud 2% | 2% | 569 | 18,100 | 3,525 | 145,358,109 company | $12,455 | 103 | |
| Anchore anchore.com | 2% | 32 | 880 | 233,891 | 10,405 | 10 | 5 | |
| Aikido aikido.dev Aikido Security 2% | 2% | 342 | 2,400 | 51 | 6,442 company | $936 | 120 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 20 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (checkmarx.com, ox.security, sentinelone.com). The first result for “best container security platform” is guptadeepak.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best container security platform for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which Kubernetes security tool would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade container security platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best container security platform for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a container security platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which container security platforms should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choiceAqua Security, Sysdig SecureChangedWizPortainerno first choiceagainst: Anchore, Falco, Qualys, Rancher, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes
Five alternatives
Falco, Kube-bench, Kubescape, Prisma Cloud, TrivyFour alternatives
Aqua Security, Prisma Cloud, SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security, Sysdig SecureTwo alternatives
Aqua Security, Prisma CloudGPT-5.4 miniSysdig SecureKyvernoChangedno first choiceRapidFortagainst: CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Securityno first choiceagainst: FortiCNAPP, Google Cloud Container Security, Sysdig Secure
Two alternatives
Aqua Security, WizThree alternatives
Falco, Kubescape, TrivySix alternatives
Anchore, Aqua Security, Prisma Cloud, Qualys Container Security, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes, Sysdig SecureTwo alternatives
Edera, Fairwinds Insights EKS EditionGemini 3.5 FlashWizWizHeldSysdig Secure, WizAikido Security, Orca Securityagainst: Prisma Cloud, Snyk Containerno first choiceagainst: Prisma Cloudagainst: Clair, Kubescape, Prisma Cloud, Trivy, VMware Carbon Black Workload / Container, Wiz
Three alternatives
Aqua Security, Prisma Cloud, Sysdig SecureThree alternatives
Aqua Security, Prisma Cloud, Sysdig SecureThree alternatives
Aqua Security, CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Prisma CloudTwo alternatives
Aqua Security, SUSE NeuVectorThree alternatives
Aqua Security, Sysdig Secure, WizPerplexity SonarPrisma CloudPrisma CloudHeldno first choicePrisma Cloudno first choicenothing named
Five alternatives
Anchore, Aqua Security, SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security, Sysdig Secure, WizFive alternatives
Aqua Security, Falco, Kyverno, Open Policy Agent, Sysdig SecureEight alternatives
Aqua Security, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, OX Security, Prisma Cloud, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes, Red Hat OpenShift, Sysdig Secure, WizOne alternative
Microsoft Defender for CloudGrok 4.1 FastAqua Security, Sysdig Secureagainst: TrivyAqua SecurityChangedno first choiceMicrosoft Defender for Cloudagainst: Prisma Cloud, Snyk Containerno first choiceagainst: Snyk Containeragainst: AWS Inspector, Alibaba Cloud, Anchore, Aqua Security, Clair, Dagda, Falco, Google Security Command Center, Kube-bench, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Oracle, Prisma Cloud, Qualys Container Security, Rapid7 InsightCloudSec, SUSE NeuVector, Snyk Container, Trivy
Five alternatives
Anchore, Prisma Cloud, SUSE NeuVector, Snyk Container, WizThree alternatives
Prisma Cloud, Sysdig Secure, Tigera Calico EnterpriseSeven alternatives
Aqua Security, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Prisma Cloud, SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security, Snyk Container, Sysdig Secure, WizTwo alternatives
Aqua Security, Sysdig SecureFour alternatives
Aqua Security, Prisma Cloud, Sysdig Secure, WizMistral SmallAqua Security, Checkmarx OneAqua Security, Sysdig SecureChangedAqua SecurityAqua Security, Sysdig Secureno first choiceagainst: SUSE NeuVector
Three alternatives
Anchore, Falco, Sysdig SecureFour alternatives
Prisma Cloud, Snyk Container, Sysdig Secure, Trend Micro (Trend) Container SecurityTwo alternatives
Prisma Cloud, Snyk ContainerDeepSeek V4 FlashAqua Security, Sysdig SecurePrisma CloudChangedPrisma CloudDocker Businessagainst: Aqua Security, Prisma Cloud, WizAqua Securityagainst: Snyk Containeragainst: Anchore, Clair, Docker Bench Security, Falco, Kube-bench, Prisma Cloud, SUSE NeuVector, Sysdig Secure, Tenable.io Container Security, Wiz
Three alternatives
Prisma Cloud, Snyk Container, WizTwo alternatives
Aqua Security, Sysdig SecureSeven alternatives
Aqua Security, CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Qualys Container Security, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes, Snyk Container, Sysdig Secure, WizTwo alternatives
Sysdig Secure, TrivyOne alternative
Sysdig SecureLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceAnchoreChangedno first choiceno first choiceAqua Securityagainst: Aqua Security, Prisma Cloud
Three alternatives
Aikido Security, Calico, KubescapeThree alternatives
AccuKnox, Minimus, WizQwen 3.7 FlashPrisma CloudPrisma CloudHeldagainst: Falco, Kyverno, Trivyno first choiceSysdig Secureno first choiceagainst: VMware
Two alternatives
Aqua Security, Sysdig SecureTwo alternatives
Snyk Container, Sysdig SecureFive alternatives
Anchore, Aqua Security, Prisma Cloud, Snyk Container, Sysdig SecureOne alternative
Aqua SecurityKimi K2Orca Security, WizPrisma CloudChangedPrisma CloudSnyk Containeragainst: Aqua Securityno first choiceagainst: Aqua Security, Portainer, Prisma Cloud, Snyk Container, Trivy
Five alternatives
Aqua Security, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Prisma Cloud, SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security, Sysdig SecureTwo alternatives
Aqua Security, WizSix alternatives
Anchore, Aqua Security, CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Snyk Container, Sysdig Secure, WizTwo alternatives
Prisma Cloud, Sysdig SecureGLM 4.7 FlashXPrisma CloudPrisma CloudHeldPrisma Cloud, WizSysdig Secureagainst: Mend, Prisma Cloudno first choiceagainst: Anchore, Falco, Prisma Cloud, Sysdig Secure, Trivy
Three alternatives
Aqua Security, Sysdig Secure, WizTwo alternatives
Aqua Cloud Native Security Platform, Sysdig SecureFive alternatives
Aqua Security, Orca Security, SUSE NeuVector, Snyk Container, Sysdig SecureOne alternative
Aqua SecurityMiniMax M2.5Aqua Security, Prisma CloudAqua Security, Prisma CloudHeldno first choiceDocker Businessagainst: Aqua Security, Prisma Cloud, Sysdig SecureAqua Security, Prisma Cloud, Sysdig Securenothing named
Four alternatives
AWS Container Security, Google Cloud Artifact Analysis & Container Analysis, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Sysdig SecureTwo alternatives
Anchore, Sysdig SecureOne alternative
PortainerGPT-6 LunaSysdig SecureSysdig SecureHeldno first choiceagainst: Snyk ContainerSysdig Secureno first choiceagainst: Check Point CloudGuard, Rapid7 InsightVM Container Security
Two alternatives
Aqua Security, Prisma CloudOne alternative
Prisma CloudOne alternative
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for KubernetesMuse Glimmer 30BPrisma CloudPrisma CloudHeldAqua Security, Prisma Cloud, Sysdig SecureDocker Business, Snyk Containeragainst: Aqua Security, CrowdStrike, Prisma Cloud, SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security, Sysdig Secure, Trend Micro (Trend) Container Securityno first choiceagainst: Aqua Security, Snyk Container, Sysdig Container and Kubernetes Security, Trivy
Two alternatives
Aqua Security, Sysdig SecureTwo alternatives
Aqua Security, Sysdig SecureThree alternatives
Orca Security, Snyk Container, WizBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 10:35 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 10:38 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 13:53 | yes | 15 | 36 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 07:59 | yes | 22 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 12:24 | yes | 23 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:08 | yes | 15 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:58 | yes | 21 | 19 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 07:47 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 11:40 | yes | 9 | 32 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 09:27 | yes | 12 | 23 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 10:18 | yes | 21 | 23 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 13:51 | no | 0 | 38 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 10:08 | yes | 3 | 18 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 07:55 | yes | 15 | 17 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 09:02 | yes | 17 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 11:39 | yes | 4 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 13:18 | yes | 11 | 25 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 08:49 | yes | 23 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 07:57 | yes | 19 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 09:08 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:05 | yes | 20 | 29 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 13:35 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 07:47 | no | 0 | 28 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 12:51 | yes | 14 | 25 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:23 | yes | 25 | 97 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 13:45 | yes | 5 | 20 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 07:48 | yes | 2 | 25 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 10:02 | yes | 11 | 15 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 13:29 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 13:17 | yes | 6 | 9 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 09:29 | yes | 21 | 28 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 08:10 | yes | 22 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 13:01 | yes | 24 | 10 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 07:36 | yes | 15 | 9 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:59 | yes | 23 | 37 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 11:17 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 09:56 | yes | 25 | 57 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 12:31 | yes | 18 | 30 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 13:40 | yes | 22 | 312 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 13:20 | yes | 11 | 23 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 11:59 | yes | 7 | 21 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 09:01 | yes | 25 | 51 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 11:14 | yes | 16 | 10 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 12:00 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 13:30 | yes | 11 | 28 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 11:30 | yes | 22 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 12:29 | yes | 17 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 13:07 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:41 | yes | 24 | 25 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 07:54 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 11:40 | no | 0 | 29 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 13:06 | yes | 24 | 28 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 11:32 | yes | 24 | 99 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:45 | yes | 15 | 44 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 12:26 | yes | 3 | 20 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 13:48 | yes | 18 | 35 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 12:32 | yes | 18 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:32 | yes | 1 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 12:53 | no | 0 | 17 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 12:02 | yes | 18 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 08:25 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 12:13 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:05 | yes | 24 | 53 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 07:42 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:21 | no | 0 | 38 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 08:48 | yes | 25 | 34 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:34 | yes | 14 | 31 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 07:36 | yes | 5 | 21 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:11 | yes | 6 | 34 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 12:23 | yes | 15 | 21 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 10:31 | yes | 18 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 12:06 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 13:47 | yes | 19 | 34 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 07:51 | yes | 19 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 08:08 | yes | 24 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 09:44 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 07:39 | yes | 23 | 56 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 12:42 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 13:04 | no | 0 | 40 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 13:39 | yes | 25 | 20 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 13:02 | yes | 21 | 79 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 11:04 | yes | 25 | 35 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 11:01 | yes | 3 | 42 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 11:31 | yes | 24 | 34 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Aikido read as Aikido Security
Aqua read as Aqua Security
Microsoft read as Microsoft Defender for Containers
Orca read as Orca Security
Palo Alto Networks (Prisma Cloud) read as Prisma Cloud
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security (ACS) read as Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security (RHACS) read as Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes
SentinelOne read as SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security
Snyk read as Snyk Container
Sysdig read as Sysdig Secure
Sysdig (Sysdig Secure) read as Sysdig Secure
Trend read as Trend Micro (Trend) Container Security
Trend Micro read as Trend Micro (Trend) Container Security
Trend Micro (Cloud One - Container Security) read as Trend Micro (Trend) Container Security
Unresolved, counted raw
ARMO
AWS Container Security (Amazon ECR + Inspector + GuardDuty)
Amazon Web Services [GuardDuty, Inspector]
Aqua Cloud Native Security Platform
Chainguard Images
Check Point Software Technologies [CloudGuard]
CrowdStrike Container Security
CrowdStrike Singularity Cloud Security
Docker Bench Security
Edera
Fairwinds Insights EKS Edition
Fortinet Lacework FortiCNAPP
Google Cloud Artifact Analysis & Container Analysis
Google Cloud [Security Command Center]
IBM [Cloud Pak for Security]
Microsoft [Defender for Containers]
Minimus
RapidFort
Red Hat (IBM) – ACS / OpenShift
Red Hat [OpenShift ACS]
Sysdig Container and Kubernetes Security
Tenable.io Container Security
Trend Micro Deep Security
VMware Carbon Black Workload / Container (Broadcom)
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.