Small business▲+5Since September 2026: 2% → 7%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
7%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 6 pointsRank 10 → 5 of 66
3 categories · RankedSysdig Secure
281Judge labels
30First choices
41Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
22% in Container security for enterprise buyers
Rank 2 of 77 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
8 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 10% of its 60 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Sysdig Secure →By buyer segmentStrongest at enterprise.
Small business5 of 74
6%50 labels
criticized challenger
Mid-market2 of 77
20%60 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise2 of 84
22%65 labels
accepted challenger
In container security · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Sysdig Secure for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Container and Kubernetes security | Cloud and infrastructure | 20% | 2 of 77 | 10% | 60 | accepted challenger | ▼−10Since September 2026: 29% → 18%, −10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Cloud-native application protection | Cloud and infrastructure | 0% | 14 of 70 | 6% | 34 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Cloud security posture management | Cloud and infrastructure | 0% | 12 of 80 | 0% | 11 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Sysdig Secure held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Container security · by segment
Mid-market▼−10Since September 2026: 29% → 18%, −10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
18%from 29% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 1 pointRank 1 → 2 of 68
Enterprise▲+3Since September 2026: 16% → 19%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
19%from 16% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 4 → 3 of 71
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Container security | 29% | 18% | ▼−10Since September 2026: 29% → 18%, −10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 1 → 2 of 77 |
| CNAPP | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 6 → 14 of 70 |
| CSPM | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 15 → 12 of 80 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Sysdig Secure across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Sysdig Secure across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 3 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 11 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 8 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 10 |
| Mistral Small | 3 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 8 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 10 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 6 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 9 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 6 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 8 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 10 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct55 labels15
Paraphrase41 labels8
Comparative75 labels5not counted in share
Budget-constrained29 labels4
Scale-constrained41 labels3
Negative40 labels2not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative281 labels in all, every segment counted; 30 of the 37 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“I would recommend Sysdig if you want the best balance of runtime protection, Kubernetes-native visibility, and scalability” Perplexity Sonar · Container security · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Choose Sysdig or Upwind if you run complex Kubernetes environments and are deeply concerned with active runtime threats” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Container security · comparative prompt · first choice
“Sysdig is repeatedly called out as best for container-first mid-market and enterprise and for K8s runtime.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Container security · direct prompt · first choice
“Sysdig Secure offers the best balance of runtime protection depth, developer integration, and price.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Container security · direct prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“historically agent-heavy monitoring platforms (like early versions of Sysdig). While Sysdig has made great strides in adding agentless context” Gemini 3.5 Flash · CNAPP · negative prompt · soft negative
“Custom quote; mid-market pricing starts around $4–5k/month ... not the best starting point for a tight budget” GLM 4.7 FlashX · CNAPP · budget prompt · soft negative
“start at higher costs (~$10k+/year for small clusters) with sales cycles... overkill if budget-conscious” Grok 4.20 · Container security · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“Caution level: Moderate (but conditional) ... it's not a "set and forget" tool.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Container security · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Sysdig Secure, over the 281 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Sysdig Secure was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Sysdig Secure, over the 281 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Sysdig Secure was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Sysdig Secure. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 256 of the 281 answers that named Sysdig Secure and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
cyberpress.org146
gbhackers.com94
expertinsights.com86
g2.com85
wiz.io73
esecurityplanet.com69
portainer.io67
cybersecuritynews.com65
thectoclub.com65
sentinelone.com60
810 of the 810 domain citations in answers naming Sysdig Secure came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
sysdig.com ranks 9 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Sysdig Secure takes 20% of first choices and Trivy takes 22%.ShowHide
Search and answers
sysdig.com ranks 9 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Sysdig Secure takes 20% of first choices and Trivy takes 22%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “container security platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “container security platforms”
9
- Searches for its name, Google
- 110 a month (“sysdig secure”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 2 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 50,599 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 7,960 · 583 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 8,318
- Paid Google search
- 5 searches its ads show for, about 26 clicks and $1,067 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
20%
rank 2 of 77 in container security
Segment leader
22%
Trivy
- First choices
- 30 across its categories
- Named in
- 281 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 256 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on sysdig.com
3,889
subdomains included
Content
1,446
counted in the table below
Documentation
942
Product · Integration
22 · 96
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 1,081 | undated | CNAPP, EDR | ||
| News or press | 169 | undated | CNAPP, CSPM | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 94 | undated | CNAPP, CSPM | ||
| Case study | 36 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 19 | 0 | 2026-04-30 | CSPM | |
| Comparison | 19 | undated | EDR, Logs | ||
| Conference or event | 18 | 0 | 2026-05-20 | CNAPP, CSPM | |
| Report or ebook | 6 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 3 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 1 | undated |
Most recent
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page sysdig.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Sysdig Secure
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Sysdig Secure; a claim can dispute any of them.
Sysdig 59
Follow Sysdig Secure
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Sysdig Secure is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Sysdig Secure is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Unify prevention, detection, and response across containers and Kubernetes, identities, workloads, and cloud services.
- For
- organizations at any scale
- Price stated
- Request a quote sysdig.com/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Get Demo sysdig.com/platform/secure
- Hosting
- US-EastUS-WestEU-CentralEU-NorthAWS-AP-SydneyAWS-AP-SouthGCP-US-WestGCP-Middle-East
- Customers named
- BigCommerceBitMEXJumpCloudApree HealthNeo4jSAP ConcurGoldman SachsSquare Enix
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, integrations, certifications
What Sysdig Secure's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: sysdig.com, sysdig.com/pricing, sysdig.com/platform/secure, sysdig.com/customers, sysdig.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Sysdig Secure's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Sysdig Secure, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Sysdig Secure by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Sysdig Secure is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Sysdig Secure, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Sysdig Secure is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.ShowHide
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Sysdig Secure is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHideSysdig Secure is among the products AI models recommend first in Container and Kubernetes security this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.