3 categories · RankedSysdig Secure
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Container and Kubernetes security | Cloud and infrastructure | 16% | 3 of 78 | 7% | 29 | accepted challenger |
| Cloud-native application protection | Cloud and infrastructure | 0% | 8 of 57 | 0% | 12 | accepted challenger |
| Cloud security posture management | Cloud and infrastructure | 0% | 34 of 53 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Wiz at 43% |
Movement
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 7 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 6 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“I'd suggest Aqua Security if you want comprehensive full-lifecycle coverage, or Sysdig Secure if runtime detection and Kubernetes security are priorities” MiniMax M2.5 · Container security · direct prompt · first choice
“Sysdig Secure is the strongest alternative... Aqua Security or Sysdig are the safest specialist bets” Kimi K2 · Container security · direct prompt · first choice
“Aqua and Sysdig remain the leaders for pure, container‑specific security across the full lifecycle.” MiniMax M2.5 · Container security · comparative prompt · first choice
“Recommendation 1: The Best Overall Commercial Solution (Value + Low Overhead) Sysdig Secure” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Container security · paraphrase prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“solid commercial option with deep container/runtime visibility, but it's more of a paid platform choice than a budget-first one” GPT-5.4 mini · Container security · budget prompt · soft negative
“you do not need a six-figure enterprise platform (such as Prisma Cloud, Wiz, or Sysdig Secure)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Container security · budget prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 84 of the 104 answers that named Sysdig Secure and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
373 of the 373 domain citations in answers naming Sysdig Secure came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Sysdig Secure's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Sysdig Secure, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at sysdig.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.