AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Cloud and infrastructure › Container security › Trivy vs Sysdig Secure
Container and Kubernetes security · October 2026 Edition

Trivy vs Sysdig Secure

Zero of fourteen models named Trivy first on the direct prompt; eight named Sysdig Secure. Trivy was named by twelve of the fourteen models and Sysdig Secure by fourteen and Trivy carries 44 labels and Sysdig Secure 60, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Trivy

accepted challenger

Named in eight categories this edition.

Sysdig Secure

accepted challenger

Named in three categories this edition.

First-choice share22%20%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate11%10%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#2A position in a field of 11; printed, not drawn.
Labels4460A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Trivy reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Snyk Container was named alongside these two in nine of the fourteen direct answers. Trivy vs Falco · Trivy vs Kubescape · Trivy vs Aqua Security

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the container and kubernetes security page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
TrivyFirst choices, of fourteen modelsSysdig Secure
Direct08
Paraphrase241 against Sysdig Secure
Comparative02
Budget-constrained1001 against Trivy · 4 against Sysdig Secure
Scale-constrained101 against Trivy
Negative103 against Trivy · 1 against Sysdig Secure
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Trivy and Sysdig Secure were named in the same answer eighty-five times, of the 224 answers naming Trivy and the 281 naming Sysdig Secure. In those answers Sysdig Secure took the first choice eight times and Trivy twenty-six.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Trivy and Sysdig Secure stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Trivy Sysdig Secure first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Trivy on the left and Sysdig Secure on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Trivy and Sysdig Secure stood in it.

Sysdig Secure first, Trivy an alternative

8 of 14 modelsTrivy was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
GPT-5.4 miniSysdig Secure alternatives: Wiz
Mistral SmallSysdig Secure alternatives: Aqua Security, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes, Snyk Container, Uptycs
DeepSeek V4 FlashSysdig Secure alternatives: Aqua Security, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes, Snyk Container, Trivy, Wiz
Llama 4 MaverickSysdig Secure alternatives: Aqua Security, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes, Snyk Container, Uptycs
Kimi K2Aqua Security, Sysdig Secure alternatives: Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes, Snyk Container
GLM 4.7 FlashXSysdig Secure alternatives: Aqua Security, Orca Security, Prisma Cloud
GPT-6 LunaSysdig Secure alternatives: Prisma Cloud, Snyk Container
Muse Glimmer 30BAqua Security, Sysdig Secure alternatives: Aikido Security, Orca Security, Prisma Cloud, Snyk Container, Wiz

Neither was the first choice, one was named

5 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Gemini 3.5 FlashOrca Security, Wiz alternatives: Snyk Container, Sysdig Secure, Upwind
Perplexity SonarWiz alternatives: Aqua Security, Prisma Cloud, Snyk Container, Sysdig Secure
Grok 4.20Wiz alternatives: Aqua Security, Orca Security, Sysdig Secure
Qwen 3.7 FlashSnyk Container, Wiz alternatives: Aqua Security, Sysdig Secure
MiniMax M2.5Orca Security, Wiz alternatives: Sysdig Secure

Neither was named

1 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choice

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Trivy leads by sixteen points.
Trivy22%#1 of 14
Sysdig Secure6%#5 of 14
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Trivy leads by two points.
Trivy22%#1 of 11
Sysdig Secure20%#2 of 11
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: Sysdig Secure leads at enterprise.
Sysdig Secure22%#2 of 10
Trivy0%#10 of 10
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Trivy

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of five in this category shown.

“In March 2026 Aqua Security’s Trivy open source vulnerability scanner was compromised in a multi-stage supply chain attack.” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“One caution: Trivy remains a capable scanner, but its project disclosed supply-chain compromises” GPT-6 Luna · budget prompt · soft negative
“Start with the open-source stack: Trivy for image scanning, Harbor for the registry, Kubescape for posture, Falco for runtime, and Cosign for signing.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice
“If you have no budget for software licenses but have engineering time, this is the gold standard... best open-source scanner available right now.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“Highly recommended for its open-source, free-to-use vulnerability scanner... making it a strong choice for budget-conscious teams.” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about Sysdig Secure

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.

“start at higher costs (~$10k+/year for small clusters) with sales cycles... overkill if budget-conscious” Grok 4.20 · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“Caution level: Moderate (but conditional) ... it's not a "set and forget" tool.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“I would recommend Sysdig if you want the best balance of runtime protection, Kubernetes-native visibility, and scalability” Perplexity Sonar · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Choose Sysdig or Upwind if you run complex Kubernetes environments and are deeply concerned with active runtime threats” Gemini 3.5 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“Sysdig is repeatedly called out as best for container-first mid-market and enterprise and for K8s runtime.” Muse Glimmer 30B · direct prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.