Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 31 → 16 of 66
1 category · RankedAnchore
35Judge labels
1First choices
5Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Container security for enterprise buyers
Rank 12 of 77 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 8 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business18 of 74
0%12 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market12 of 77
0%8 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise9 of 84
2%15 labels
criticized challenger
In container security · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Anchore for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Container and Kubernetes security | Cloud and infrastructure | 0% | 12 of 77 | 0% | 8 | under 10 labels · led by Trivy at 22% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Anchore held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Container security · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 21 → 12 of 68
Enterprise▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 50 → 9 of 71
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Container security | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 21 → 12 of 77 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Anchore across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Anchore across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct7 labelsNone
Paraphrase6 labels1
Comparative9 labelsNone
Budget-constrained3 labelsNone
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative7 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative35 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“If you need more advanced features and can invest a little, consider Anchore\u2019s open-source or low-cost plans.” Mistral Small · Container security · budget prompt · alternative
“Another strong option, particularly if you need deeper container analysis and policy enforcement.” MiniMax M2.5 · Container security · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Anchore (open‑source) – deploy the engine on a small VM or use the free hosted service.” MiniMax M2.5 · Container security · budget prompt · alternative
“Supply Chain Focused ... Anchore Enterprise or Trivy” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Container security · negative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Anchore, over the 35 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Anchore was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Anchore, over the 35 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Anchore was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Anchore. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 32 of the 35 answers that named Anchore and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
cyberpress.org25
portainer.io18
thectoclub.com18
esecurityplanet.com15
g2.com13
ox.security13
gbhackers.com11
checkmarx.com9
expertinsights.com9
john-pratt.com9
140 of the 140 domain citations in answers naming Anchore came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
anchore.com ranks 5 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Anchore takes 0% of first choices and Trivy takes 22%.ShowHide
Search and answers
anchore.com ranks 5 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Anchore takes 0% of first choices and Trivy takes 22%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “container security platform”
5
Position for “container security platforms”
6
- Searches for its name, Google
- 880 a month (“anchore”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 233,891 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 10,405 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 1,207 · 134 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 2,282
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 12 of 77 in container security
Segment leader
22%
Trivy
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 35 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 32 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on anchore.com
1,341
subdomains included
Content
606
counted in the table below
Documentation
572
Product · Integration
5 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 453 | 17 | 2026-09-22 | SCA | |
| News or press | 58 | 0 | 2021-12-21 | ||
| Report or ebook | 34 | 0 | 2026-06-11 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 23 | 5 | 2026-09-03 | ||
| Case study | 18 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 6 | 0 | 2026-03-23 | ||
| Comparison | 5 | undated | SCA | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 4 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 3 | 1 | 2026-07-25 | ||
| Podcast or video | 2 | 0 | 2026-03-24 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-22Fedramp cmmc in 2026 what actually changed for your ato blog
- 2026-09-15Extending supply chain security to ai models with anchore enterprise v6 2 blog
- 2026-09-10What your vulnerability scan misses the moment a zero day drops blog
- 2026-09-03The security tax a 2026 playbook for supply chain security and compliance webinar or virtual event
- 2026-09-03Anchore ai just got easier the anchore enterprise mcp server blog
- 2026-09-01Your kubernetes cluster is running images your registry scan never checked blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page anchore.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Anchore
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Anchore; a claim can dispute any of them.
Anchore Enterprise 3
Follow Anchore
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Anchore is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Anchore is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- SBOM-Powered Software Composition Analysis
- For
- Large enterprises and government agencies
- Price stated
- Request Pricing; Request Federal Pricing anchore.com/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Free Trial anchore.com
- Hosting
- Amazon Web Services
- Customers named
- Cisco Container PlatformPlatform OneNGCDoD Iron BankAir ForceCiscoebayGitHub
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, integrations, certifications
What Anchore's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: anchore.com, anchore.com/pricing, anchore.com/security, anchore.com/platform, anchore.com/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Anchore's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Anchore, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Anchore by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Anchore is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Anchore, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.