Container and Kubernetes security
Asked as “container security platform”, and as “Kubernetes security tool”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 59 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
22%
Contested · Sysdig Secure 20%
22Trivy20Sysdig Secure15Falco42others
22% of first choices, contested.
Since September 2026↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: Trivy (22%) replaces Sysdig Secure (29% then, 18% now), 4 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.Trivy leads at 22%, replacing Sysdig Secure, which led at 29% and stands at 18% now: 4 points clear, inside the floor, so the swap reads as unsettled.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Trivy22%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: Snyk Container (21%) replaces Trivy (28% then, 19% now), 2 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.Standing →Mid-marketTrivy22%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: Trivy (22%) replaces Sysdig Secure (29% then, 18% now), 4 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.This pageEnterprise
Prisma Cloud25%Contested▼−4Since September 2026: 29% → 25%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →
Trivy22%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: Snyk Container (21%) replaces Trivy (28% then, 19% now), 2 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.Standing →Mid-marketTrivy22%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: Trivy (22%) replaces Sysdig Secure (29% then, 18% now), 4 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.This pageEnterprisePrisma Cloud25%Contested▼−4Since September 2026: 29% → 25%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01Trivy22%11%44accepted challenger▲+6Since September 2026: 16% → 22%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.16% → 22%
Trivy22%11%44accepted challenger▲+6Since September 2026: 16% → 22%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.16% → 22%02
Sysdig Secure20%10%60accepted challenger▼−10Since September 2026: 29% → 18%, −10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.29% → 18%
Sysdig Secure20%10%60accepted challenger▼−10Since September 2026: 29% → 18%, −10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.29% → 18%03
Falco15%5%39accepted challenger▲+6Since September 2026: 10% → 16%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.10% → 16%
Falco15%5%39accepted challenger▲+6Since September 2026: 10% → 16%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.10% → 16%04
Kubescape15%0%27accepted challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 10% → 14%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.10% → 14%
Kubescape15%0%27accepted challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 10% → 14%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.10% → 14%05
Aqua Security8%20%59accepted challenger▼−12Since September 2026: 18% → 6%, −12 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.18% → 6%
Aqua Security8%20%59accepted challenger▼−12Since September 2026: 18% → 6%, −12 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.18% → 6%06
Wiz8%14%35accepted challenger▲+6Since September 2026: 4% → 10%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 10%
Wiz8%14%35accepted challenger▲+6Since September 2026: 4% → 10%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 10%07
Snyk Container5%9%44accepted challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 2% → 6%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 6%
Snyk Container5%9%44accepted challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 2% → 6%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 6%08
Orca Security3%6%18accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 4%
Orca Security3%6%18accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 4%09
SUSE NeuVector2%0%13accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%
SUSE NeuVector2%0%13accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%Show the two products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
10Prisma Cloud0%29%49criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Prisma Cloud0%29%49criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%11
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes0%0%15accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes0%0%15accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Trivy vs Aqua SecurityTrivy vs WizTrivy vs Snyk ContainerTrivy vs Orca SecuritySysdig Secure vs FalcoSysdig Secure vs KubescapeSysdig Secure vs Aqua SecuritySysdig Secure vs WizSysdig Secure vs Snyk ContainerSysdig Secure vs Orca SecurityFalco vs KubescapeFalco vs Aqua SecurityFalco vs WizFalco vs Snyk ContainerFalco vs Orca SecurityKubescape vs Aqua SecurityKubescape vs WizKubescape vs Snyk ContainerKubescape vs Orca SecurityAqua Security vs WizAqua Security vs Snyk ContainerAqua Security vs Orca SecurityWiz vs Snyk ContainerWiz vs Orca SecuritySnyk Container vs Orca Security
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
0102030405060708091011Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01Trivy22%
Trivy22%02Sysdig Secure20%
Sysdig Secure20%03Falco15%
Falco15%04Kubescape15%
Kubescape15%05Aqua Security8%
Aqua Security8%06Wiz8%
Wiz8%07Snyk Container5%
Snyk Container5%08Orca Security3%
Orca Security3%09SUSE NeuVector2%
SUSE NeuVector2%10Prisma Cloud0%
Prisma Cloud0%11Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes0%
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes0%What they warned about
One of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.1 Fast, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5 and GPT-6 Luna changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Aqua Security20%
12 of 59 labels negative · 9 of 14 models
“In March 2026 Aqua Security’s Trivy open source vulnerability scanner was compromised in a multi-stage supply chain attack.” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
Prisma Cloud29%
14 of 49 labels negative · 8 of 14 models
“It lacks meaningful AI-specific artifact or inference API security features and has limited correlation between CI/CD changes and vulnerabilities” Claude Haiku 4.5, negative prompt
Sysdig Secure10%
6 of 60 labels negative · 5 of 14 models
“start at higher costs (~$10k+/year for small clusters) with sales cycles... overkill if budget-conscious” Grok 4.1 Fast, paraphrase prompt
Trivy11%
5 of 44 labels negative · 4 of 14 models
“In March 2026 Aqua Security’s Trivy open source vulnerability scanner was compromised in a multi-stage supply chain attack.” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
What they cite
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.
Sites the answers cite
76 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1024 links across 208 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 6 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · CyberPress41 answers · 65 citations · 12 models
33 answers · 37 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Portainer30 answers · 30 citations · 10 models
30 answers · 30 citations · 12 models
26 answers · 40 citations · 12 models
26 answers · 26 citations · 9 models
24 answers · 24 citations · 11 models
vendor site · G223 answers · 30 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Checkmarx22 answers · 30 citations · 11 models
21 answers · 25 citations · 11 models
vendor site · OX20 answers · 25 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Wiz18 answers · 26 citations · 11 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
31 answers · 11 models
30 answers · 12 models
27 answers · 12 models
26 answers · 9 models
24 answers · 11 models
22 answers · 9 models
18 answers · 11 models
16 answers · 9 models
15 answers · 10 models
14 answers · 9 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best container security platform”, “container security platform”, “container security platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trivy trivy.dev | 22% | 207 | 5,400 | 182 | 3,093 | |||
| Sysdig Secure sysdig.com | 20% | 256 | 110 | 2 | 50,599 | $1,067 | 4 | 9 |
| Falco falco.org | 15% | 101 | 27,100 | 4,242 | 383 | |||
| Kubescape kubescape.io | 15% | 75 | 260 | 1 | 150 | |||
| Aqua aquasec.com Aqua Security 8% | 8% | 199 | 880 | 32 | 7,831 company | 0 | 2 | |
| Wiz wiz.io | 8% | 688 | 40,500 | 16,751 | 102,573 | $6,856 | 120 | 3 |
| Snyk snyk.io Snyk Container 5% | 5% | 109 | 12,100 | 581 | 61,651 company | 60 | ||
| Orca Security orca.security | 3% | 401 | 1,900 | 103 | 125,483 | $441 | 27 | |
| SUSE NeuVector suse.com | 2% | 32 | 20 | 0 | 59,615 | 103 | 9 | |
| Prisma prismacloud.io Prisma Cloud 0% | 0% | 475 | 1,300 | 97 | 2,039 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 20 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (checkmarx.com, ox.security, wiz.io). The first result for “best container security platform” is guptadeepak.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best container security platform for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which Kubernetes security tool would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top container security platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best container security platform for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a container security platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which container security platforms should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choiceFalco, KubescapeChangedWizFalco, Trivyno first choiceagainst: Falco, Kube-bench, Prisma Cloud, Trivy
Five alternatives
Aqua Security, Calico, Kube-bench, Sysdig Secure, TrivyThree alternatives
Aqua Security, Prisma Cloud, Sysdig SecureTwo alternatives
Aqua Security, Snyk ContainerGPT-5.4 miniSysdig SecureKubescapeChangedno first choiceSnyk Containeragainst: Aqua Security, Sysdig Secureno first choicenothing named
One alternative
WizThree alternatives
Aqua Security, Falco, Prisma CloudFive alternatives
Aqua Security, Microsoft Defender for Containers, Prisma Cloud, Sysdig Secure, WizTwo alternatives
Amazon Inspector + AWS Security Hub, Artifact AnalysisGemini 3.5 FlashOrca Security, Wizagainst: Prisma CloudSysdig SecureChangedagainst: Prisma Cloud, WizSysdig Secure, WizSUSE NeuVectoragainst: CrowdStrike, Wizno first choiceagainst: Kubernetes PodSecurityPolicy, Red Hat Container Security Operator
Three alternatives
Snyk Container, Sysdig Secure, UpwindFour alternatives
ARMO Platform, Datadog Cloud Security Management, Kyverno, TrivyFour alternatives
Aqua Security, Prisma Cloud, Snyk Container, UpwindSix alternatives
ARMO Platform, Aikido Security, Falco, Kubescape, Snyk Container, TrivyPerplexity SonarWizSysdig SecureChangedWizTrivyagainst: Aqua Security, Prisma Cloud, Sysdig Secureno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
Aqua Security, Prisma Cloud, Snyk Container, Sysdig SecureThree alternatives
Aqua Security, Kubescape, TrivyTen alternatives
Aqua Security, CrowdStrike, Falco, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Prisma Cloud, SUSE NeuVector, SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security, Sysdig Secure, Tigera, TrivyThree alternatives
Falco, Kubescape, Snyk ContainerGrok 4.1 FastWizKubescapeChangedagainst: Aqua Security, Sysdig SecureAqua SecurityFalco, Kubescape, Trivyagainst: Aqua Security, Prisma Cloud, Snyk Container, Sysdig SecureSnyk Containeragainst: Falco, Kyverno, Trivyagainst: Aqua Security, Clair, Google Cloud Container Security, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Prisma Cloud, Trivy
Three alternatives
Aqua Security, Orca Security, Sysdig SecureOne alternative
FalcoSeven alternatives
Orca Security, Prisma Cloud, SentinelOne Singularity, Snyk Container, Sysdig Secure, Trivy, WizTwo alternatives
Harbor, SUSE NeuVectorThree alternatives
Aqua Security, Sysdig Secure, WizMistral SmallSysdig SecureAqua Security, Sysdig SecureChangedSysdig SecureTrivyno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
Aqua Security, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes, Snyk Container, UptycsOne alternative
Datadog Cloud Security ManagementSeven alternatives
Aquasecurity, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Prisma Cloud, Qualys Container Security, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes, Snyk Container, WizTwo alternatives
Anchore, ClairDeepSeek V4 FlashSysdig SecureKubescapeChangedno first choiceagainst: Snyk ContainerFalco, Trivyno first choiceagainst: Aqua Security, Palo Alto Networks – Prisma Cloud, Snyk Container, Sysdig Secure, Wiz
Five alternatives
Aqua Security, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes, Snyk Container, Trivy, WizThree alternatives
Falco, Sysdig Secure, TrivyFour alternatives
Aqua Security, Prisma Cloud, Sysdig Secure, WizFour alternatives
Harbor, Kubescape, SUSE NeuVector, Snyk ContainerLlama 4 MaverickSysdig Secureno first choiceChangedno first choiceno first choiceno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
Aqua Security, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes, Snyk Container, UptycsQwen 3.7 FlashSnyk Container, Wizagainst: Prisma CloudFalco, TrivyChangedOrca Security, WizFalco, Trivyagainst: Aqua Security, Prisma Cloudno first choiceagainst: Chainguard, Prisma Cloud, Wiz
Two alternatives
Aqua Security, Sysdig SecureFour alternatives
OPA/Gatekeeper, Prisma Cloud, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes, Sysdig SecureFive alternatives
Aqua Security, OX Security, Prisma Cloud, Snyk Container, Sysdig SecureTwo alternatives
Snyk Container, Sysdig SecureKimi K2Aqua Security, Sysdig Secureagainst: CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Orca Security, Prisma Cloud, WizFalco, KubescapeChangedWizTrivyagainst: Prisma Cloud Business Editionno first choiceagainst: Aqua Security, Elastic Defend for Containers, Microsoft Defender Adaptive App Controls, Prisma Cloud, Rapid7 InsightVM Container Security
Two alternatives
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes, Snyk ContainerFive alternatives
Aqua Security, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes, SUSE NeuVector, Sysdig Secure, TrivyFour alternatives
Aqua Security, Prisma Cloud, Snyk Container, Sysdig SecureFour alternatives
Anchore Open Source, Falco, Kubescape, Snyk ContainerTen alternatives
Aikido Security, Aqua Security, Falco, Microsoft Defender for Containers, Orca Security, SUSE NeuVector, Snyk Container, Sysdig Secure, Trivy, WizGLM 4.7 FlashXSysdig SecureAqua SecurityChangedno first choiceFalco, Kubescape, Trivyagainst: Aqua Security, Prisma Cloudno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Aqua Security, Orca Security, Prisma CloudFour alternatives
Cilium, Falco, Kubescape, OPA/GatekeeperTwelve alternatives
Anchore, Aqua Security, CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Falco, Orca Security, Prisma Cloud, Qualys Container Security, SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security, Snyk Container, Sysdig Secure, Trivy, WizFive alternatives
Cosign, Harbor, Kyverno, OPA/Gatekeeper, Snyk ContainerMiniMax M2.5Orca Security, WizTrivyChangedagainst: OPA/GatekeeperWizTrivyagainst: Aqua Securityno first choicenothing named
One alternative
Sysdig SecureFour alternatives
Anchore, Cilium, Falco, KyvernoFive alternatives
Aqua Security, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Prisma Cloud, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes, Sysdig SecureSeven alternatives
Anchore, Clair, Deepfence ThreatMapper, Google Cloud Container Analysis, Microsoft Defender for Containers, Snyk Container, Sysdig SecureGPT-6 LunaSysdig SecureKubescapeChangedno first choiceKubescapeagainst: Trivyno first choiceagainst: Aqua Security's open-source Trivy
Two alternatives
Prisma Cloud, Snyk ContainerOne alternative
Sysdig SecureSeven alternatives
Amazon ECR scanning with Amazon Inspector, Aqua Security, Microsoft Defender for Cloud — Defender for Containers, Prisma Cloud, Snyk Container, Sysdig Secure, WizOne alternative
GrypeMuse Glimmer 30BAqua Security, Sysdig SecureAqua Security, Sysdig SecureHeldAqua Security, Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud ComputeTrivyagainst: Aqua Security, Prisma Cloud, Red Hat's Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes, Sysdig SecureFalco, Trivyagainst: Aqua Security, Snyk Container, Trivy
Five alternatives
Aikido Security, Orca Security, Prisma Cloud, Snyk Container, WizTwo alternatives
Falco, KubescapeSeven alternatives
Falco, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Orca Security, Snyk Container, Sysdig Secure, Trivy, WizFive alternatives
Calico, Falco, Harbor, Kubescape, SUSE NeuVectorSeven alternatives
Aqua Security, Harbor, Kubescape, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Prisma Cloud, Sysdig Secure, WizBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 11:52 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:00 | yes | 2 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 13:37 | yes | 14 | 22 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 08:13 | yes | 25 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 12:34 | yes | 23 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 09:31 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 13:28 | yes | 22 | 29 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:32 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:17 | yes | 10 | 47 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 13:51 | yes | 9 | 21 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 10:12 | yes | 19 | 139 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 08:18 | yes | 10 | 14 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 10:24 | yes | 4 | 13 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 10:42 | yes | 12 | 17 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 07:37 | yes | 16 | 9 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 08:55 | yes | 3 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 12:58 | yes | 11 | 23 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:38 | yes | 23 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:15 | yes | 20 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 09:40 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 08:37 | yes | 18 | 25 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 13:18 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 09:01 | no | 0 | 29 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 12:16 | yes | 17 | 20 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 10:11 | yes | 10 | 35 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:49 | yes | 5 | 43 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 11:16 | yes | 3 | 14 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 12:31 | yes | 17 | 39 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 13:13 | yes | 9 | 10 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 11:06 | yes | 5 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 13:37 | yes | 21 | 23 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 09:45 | yes | 23 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 09:41 | yes | 20 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 13:12 | yes | 6 | 8 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:39 | yes | 24 | 34 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 11:33 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:52 | yes | 9 | 23 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 13:42 | yes | 20 | 25 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 10:12 | yes | 20 | 114 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 13:46 | yes | 24 | 42 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 10:31 | yes | 7 | 30 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 11:15 | yes | 12 | 34 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:30 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 11:48 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 13:07 | yes | 9 | 23 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:13 | yes | 21 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 08:59 | yes | 18 | 12 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 12:32 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:19 | yes | 22 | 19 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 08:43 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 13:02 | no | 0 | 37 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 12:11 | yes | 14 | 20 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 11:42 | yes | 22 | 43 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 13:02 | no | 0 | 49 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 09:36 | yes | 4 | 20 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 08:53 | yes | 10 | 17 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 12:48 | yes | 17 | 12 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 07:59 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 10:47 | no | 0 | 17 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 11:34 | yes | 18 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 09:13 | yes | 20 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 08:48 | no | 0 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 12:33 | yes | 17 | 62 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 07:57 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 12:04 | no | 0 | 36 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 13:11 | yes | 22 | 28 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 10:35 | yes | 20 | 56 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 08:12 | yes | 5 | 11 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:12 | yes | 2 | 18 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 11:44 | yes | 14 | 22 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 13:05 | yes | 17 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 10:48 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 13:48 | yes | 17 | 23 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 09:04 | yes | 19 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 09:20 | yes | 25 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 13:51 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:30 | yes | 23 | 40 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 12:29 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 13:29 | yes | 18 | 42 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 09:50 | yes | 24 | 21 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 12:54 | yes | 16 | 49 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:26 | yes | 18 | 32 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 13:36 | yes | 1 | 22 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 09:25 | yes | 25 | 36 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Aikido read as Aikido Security
Aqua read as Aqua Security
Aqua Platform read as Aqua Security
Datadog read as Datadog Cloud Security Management
Microsoft read as Microsoft Defender for Containers
Microsoft Defender read as Microsoft Defender for Containers
Orca read as Orca Security
Palo Alto Networks (Prisma Cloud) read as Prisma Cloud
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security read as Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security (ACS) read as Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security (RHACS) read as Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes
SentinelOne read as SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security
Snyk read as Snyk Container
Sysdig read as Sysdig Secure
Trend read as Trend Micro (Trend) Container Security
Unresolved, counted raw
ARMO
Amazon ECR scanning with Amazon Inspector
Amazon Inspector + AWS Security Hub
Anchore Open Source (Syft + Grype)
Aqua Security's open-source Trivy
Aquasecurity (Aqua Platform)
Artifact Analysis
Elastic Defend for Containers
Google Cloud Container Analysis
Kubernetes PodSecurityPolicy (PSP)
Microsoft Defender Adaptive App Controls
Microsoft Defender for Cloud — Defender for Containers
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud Compute
Palo Alto Networks – Prisma Cloud
Pod Security Standards (PSS) / Pod Security Admission (PSA)
Prisma Cloud Business Edition
Red Hat Container Security Operator (CSO)
Red Hat's Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes
ThreatMapper
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.