| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data security posture management | Security operations | 0% | 87 of 105 | 40% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Purview at 18% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Zscaler DSPM or Wiz may be cheaper *in practice* if DSPM is bundled into an existing suite” GPT-5.4 mini · DSPM · budget prompt · alternative
“Need zero-trust/cloud-access aligned data security: Zscaler DSPM.” GPT-5.4 mini · DSPM · comparative prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“their foray into "Data Centric Security" is sometimes viewed as secondary to their core business” Qwen 3.7 Flash · DSPM · negative prompt · soft negative
“user reviews specifically warn about a "setup loophole"” GLM 4.7 FlashX · DSPM · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 17 of the 18 answers that named Zscaler DSPM and are not a share of its labels.
Sixty-nine of the sixty-nine domain citations in answers naming Zscaler DSPM came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Zscaler DSPM's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: help.zscaler.com/dspm/dspm-modules, help.zscaler.com/dspm/about-alerts, help.zscaler.com/dspm/managing-alerts, help.zscaler.com/dspm/about-compliance, help.zscaler.com/dspm/integrating-jira. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Zscaler DSPM's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Zscaler DSPM, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Zscaler DSPM by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: