AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Network and edge › Microsegmentation › Akamai Guardicore Segmentation vs Zscaler Private Access
Microsegmentation · October 2026 Edition

Akamai Guardicore Segmentation vs Zscaler Private Access

One of fourteen models named Akamai Guardicore Segmentation first on the direct prompt; one named Zscaler Private Access. Akamai Guardicore Segmentation was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Zscaler Private Access by eight and Akamai Guardicore Segmentation carries 51 labels and Zscaler Private Access 14, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Named in two categories this edition.

Zscaler Private Access

accepted challenger

Named in three categories this edition.

First-choice share12%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate20%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#6A position in a field of 9; printed, not drawn.
Labels5114A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Akamai Guardicore Segmentation reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.ColorTokens Xshield was named alongside these two in twelve of the fourteen direct answers. ColorTokens Xshield vs Akamai Guardicore Segmentation · ColorTokens Xshield vs Zscaler Private Access · Illumio Segmentation vs Akamai Guardicore Segmentation

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the microsegmentation page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Akamai Guardicore SegmentationFirst choices, of fourteen modelsZscaler Private Access
Direct11
Paraphrase501 against Akamai Guardicore Segmentation
Comparative30
Budget-constrained005 against Akamai Guardicore Segmentation
Scale-constrained10
Negative004 against Akamai Guardicore Segmentation
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Akamai Guardicore Segmentation and Zscaler Private Access were named in the same answer twenty-eight times, of the 149 answers naming Akamai Guardicore Segmentation and the 209 naming Zscaler Private Access. In those answers Zscaler Private Access took the first choice two times and Akamai Guardicore Segmentation four.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Akamai Guardicore Segmentation and Zscaler Private Access stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Akamai Guardicore Segmentation Zscaler Private Access first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Akamai Guardicore Segmentation on the left and Zscaler Private Access on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Akamai Guardicore Segmentation and Zscaler Private Access stood in it.

Akamai Guardicore Segmentation first, Zscaler Private Access not the choice

1 of 14 modelsZscaler Private Access was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Qwen 3.7 FlashAkamai Guardicore Segmentation, Illumio Segmentation alternatives: ColorTokens Xshield

Zscaler Private Access first, Akamai Guardicore Segmentation an alternative

1 of 14 modelsAkamai Guardicore Segmentation was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Perplexity SonarColorTokens Xshield, Zscaler Private Access alternatives: Akamai Guardicore Segmentation, Cisco Secure Workload, Illumio Segmentation

Neither was the first choice, one was named

9 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Claude Haiku 4.5ColorTokens Xshield alternatives: Akamai Guardicore Segmentation, Cisco Secure Workload, Illumio Segmentation, Zero Networks Segment
GPT-5.4 miniIllumio Segmentation alternatives: Akamai Guardicore Segmentation, Zero Networks Segment
Grok 4.1 FastColorTokens Xshield alternatives: Akamai Guardicore Segmentation, Illumio Segmentation, Zscaler Private Access
Mistral SmallColorTokens Xshield alternatives: Akamai Guardicore Segmentation, Elisity, Illumio Segmentation
DeepSeek V4 FlashColorTokens Xshield alternatives: Akamai Guardicore Segmentation, Illumio Segmentation
Kimi K2ColorTokens Xshield alternatives: Akamai Guardicore Segmentation, SideChannel Enclave
GLM 4.7 FlashXColorTokens Xshield alternatives: Akamai Guardicore Segmentation, Illumio Segmentation
GPT-6 LunaIllumio Segmentation alternatives: Akamai Guardicore Segmentation, Cisco Secure Workload
Muse Glimmer 30BColorTokens Xshield alternatives: Akamai Guardicore Segmentation, Cisco Secure Workload, formerly Tetration, Illumio Segmentation

Neither was named

3 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Gemini 3.5 FlashColorTokens Xshield alternatives: 6sense, Faddom, HubSpot, SideChannel, Zero Networks Segment
Llama 4 MaverickColorTokens Xshield
MiniMax M2.5ColorTokens Xshield alternatives: Illumio Segmentation

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Akamai Guardicore Segmentation leads by four points.
Akamai Guardicore Segmentation6%#4 of 10
Zscaler Private Access1%#9 of 10
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Akamai Guardicore Segmentation leads by eleven points.
Akamai Guardicore Segmentation12%#3 of 9
Zscaler Private Access2%#6 of 9
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Akamai Guardicore Segmentation leads by fourteen points.
Akamai Guardicore Segmentation15%#2 of 9
Zscaler Private Access2%#8 of 9
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Akamai Guardicore Segmentation

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“Avoid first if budget is tight: Akamai Guardicore, because pricing can be a constraint.” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · hard negative
“some users report agent overhead, integration bugs, complex maps/visuals, and accuracy limits in risk detection” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · soft negative
“Initial mapping complexity and operational overhead... can be overwhelming to organize manually” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Akamai Guardicore Segmentation is a top choice due to its strong east-west visibility, ease of deployment, and support for hybrid environments” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Illumio and Akamai Guardicore Segmentation are generally considered the top contenders for this segment” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“For most mid-sized B2B companies, I'd recommend Akamai Guardicore Segmentation as your primary choice.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · paraphrase prompt · first choice

What the models said about Zscaler Private Access

No label in this category carried a quote.

Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.