AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Zilla Security · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Zilla Security

10Judge labels
1First choices
1Negative labels
5 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
4 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Zilla Security was named 4 times in IGA, where Microsoft Entra ID Governance led with 25%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In iga · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Zilla Security for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Identity governanceIdentity and access0%46 of 7625%4under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Entra ID Governance at 25%▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Zilla Security held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · IGA · by segment

Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 28 of 84, unchanged
Mid-market▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 17 → 41 of 71
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 9 → 10 of 70

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
IGA2%0%▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 17 → 46 of 76

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Zilla Security across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash01113
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.2000000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200101
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained6 labels1
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative10 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Choose Zilla Security if your most urgent priority is completing your quarterly SOC 2 user access reviews” Gemini 3.5 Flash · IGA · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Platforms to watch out for: Lumos, ConductorOne, Zilla Security” Gemini 3.5 Flash · IGA · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Zilla Security, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Zilla Security was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Lumos10 of 101Not among the top eight
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud8 of 100Not among the top eight
Saviynt Enterprise Identity Cloud8 of 100Not among the top eight
Microsoft Entra ID Governance7 of 104Not among the top eight
ConductorOne7 of 100Not among the top eight
Okta Identity Governance4 of 100Not among the top eight
Omada Identity4 of 100Not among the top eight
Okta3 of 101Not among the top eight
Zluri3 of 100Not among the top eight
Microsoft Entra ID2 of 101Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Zilla Security. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 8 of the 10 answers that named Zilla Security and are not a share of its labels.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on zillasecurity.com
9,712
subdomains included
Content
8,556
counted in the table below
Documentation
20
Product · Integration
15 · 3
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog4,699292026-09-01XDR, SASE
Report or ebook1,88002023-05-01SASE, SD-WAN
Podcast or video53402015-08-01SASE, XDR
News or press40802018-12-01SASE, Firewalls
Glossary or explainer36202024-01-01EDR, SD-WAN
Case study351undatedSASE, MDR
Conference or event11302023-07-01SASE
Comparison9802023-03-01SASE, XDR
Webinar or virtual event9002021-01-01SOAR, MDR
Template or tool2102019-06-01
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page zillasecurity.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name SASE (190); 0 name the category the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Zilla Security

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Zilla Security's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Zilla Security, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Zilla Security by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Zilla Security is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Zilla Security, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at zillasecurity.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.