Every category where a model named Wizer for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Security awareness training	Security operations	20%	2 of 65	0%	11	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Wizer yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Wizer across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	2	1	3
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	1
Kimi K2	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct10 labels1

Paraphrase4 labels1

Comparative7 labels3not counted in share

Budget-constrained19 labels17

Scale-constrained5 labelsNone

Negative6 labels2not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative51 labels in all, every segment counted; 19 of the 24 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If you want something incredibly easy to deploy, highly effective, and very budget-friendly, Wizer is a top recommendation.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Awareness training · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“I'd start with Wizer's free tier if you truly have zero budget, or Curricula if you can spend a modest amount” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Awareness training · budget prompt · first choice

“Wizer is frequently cited as the best choice for companies that want to start without paying immediately” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Awareness training · budget prompt · first choice

“Wizer stands out as the top security awareness training platform based on recent reviews and comparisons” Grok 4.1 Fast · Awareness training · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Wizer, over the 51 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Wizer was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Hook Security44 of 5117Not in the top three

KnowBe442 of 514Compare →

Huntress Managed Security Awareness Training33 of 512Not in the top three

CanIPhish31 of 510Not in the top three

Hoxhunt11 of 511Compare →

EasyLlama8 of 511Not in the top three

Microsoft Attack Simulation Training8 of 511Not in the top three

Proofpoint ZenGuide8 of 510Not in the top three

SoSafe8 of 510Not in the top three

usecure6 of 510Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Wizer. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 41 of the 51 answers that named Wizer and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

hooksecurity.co38

smallbizsecurityguide.com29

learn.g2.com26

hoxhunt.com25

expertinsights.com21

adaptivesecurity.com20

easyllama.com19

g2.com13

guardey.com13

knowbe4.com12

216 of the 216 domain citations in answers naming Wizer came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

hooksecurity.co/blog/best-security-awareness-training-small-business38

smallbizsecurityguide.com/best-security-awareness-training-platforms-202629

learn.g2.com/best-security-awareness-training-software26

hoxhunt.com/blog/best-security-awareness-training23

easyllama.com/blog/best-security-awareness-training-providers19

expertinsights.com/security-awareness-training/the-top-security-awareness-training-platfor17

adaptivesecurity.com/blog/best-security-awareness-training-small-businesses12

dataconomy.com/2026/06/10/which-security-awareness-training-solution-is-right-for-you-5-op10

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Wizer

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Wizer; a claim can dispute any of them.

Wizer (Free Tier) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Wizer's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Wizer, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at wizer-training.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.