Small business▼−11Since September 2026: 20% → 9%, −11 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
9%from 20% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 0 pointsRank 3 → 4 of 62
2 categories · RankedWizer
51Judge labels
10First choices
1Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
10% in Awareness training for small business buyers
Rank 3 of 64 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 11 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Wizer →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business4 of 70
10%23 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market3 of 64
8%11 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise52 of 55
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In awareness training · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Wizer for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Security awareness training | Security operations | 8% | 3 of 64 | 0% | 11 | accepted challenger | ▼−15Since September 2026: 20% → 5%, −15 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Secure code training | Developer platform | 2% | 8 of 97 | 0% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by SecureFlag at 26% |
Movement
Since September 2026, Wizer moved past the floor in one of two categories: Awareness training, −15 points to 5%. It held within the floor in the other one.
Best category · Awareness training · by segment
Mid-market▼−15Since September 2026: 20% → 5%, −15 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.
5%from 20% in September 2026
Cleared the floor by 4 pointsRank 2 → 5 of 62
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 41 → 47 of 50
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Awareness training | 20% | 5% | ▼−15Since September 2026: 20% → 5%, −15 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked. | Moved past the floor | Rank 2 → 3 of 64 |
| Secure code training | 0% | 2% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now. | New this edition | Rank 8 of 97, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Wizer across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Wizer across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct9 labels1
Paraphrase3 labels1
Comparative9 labels5not counted in share
Budget-constrained23 labels8
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative5 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative51 labels in all, every segment counted; 10 of the 15 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“SafeStack Academy and Wizer are highly recommended for companies with limited budgets” Mistral Small · Secure code training · budget prompt · first choice
“Wizer stands out as the top recommendation for a security awareness training platform” Grok 4.20 · Awareness training · budget prompt · first choice
“Zero budget to prove value → Wizer free tier or CanIPhish free tier.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Awareness training · budget prompt · first choice
“Wizer — *Best Overall for Simplicity & Short Video Training*” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Awareness training · budget prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Wizer, over the 51 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Wizer was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Wizer, over the 51 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Wizer was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Wizer. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 51 of the 51 answers that named Wizer and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
g2.com35
hooksecurity.co27
adaptivesecurity.com26
ransomleak.com22
easyllama.com21
learn.g2.com20
sourceforge.net17
knowbe4.com16
expertinsights.com15
guardey.com15
214 of the 214 domain citations in answers naming Wizer came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
wizer-training.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Wizer takes 8% of first choices and KnowBe4 takes 45%.ShowHide
Search and answers
wizer-training.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Wizer takes 8% of first choices and KnowBe4 takes 45%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “security awareness training platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “security awareness training platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 6,600 a month (“wizer”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 60 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 5,397 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 631 · 61 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,072
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
8%
rank 3 of 64 in awareness training
Segment leader
45%
KnowBe4
- First choices
- 10 across its categories
- Named in
- 51 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 51 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on wizer-training.com
679
subdomains included
Content
389
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
3 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 263 | 2 | 2026-08-18 | Awareness training, MFA | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 89 | 0 | 2026-05-14 | Awareness training | |
| Report or ebook | 16 | undated | Awareness training | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 13 | 1 | 2026-08-05 | Awareness training | |
| Template or tool | 4 | 1 | 2026-08-12 | ||
| Comparison | 2 | 0 | 2021-10-06 | ||
| Case study | 1 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-08-185 phishing simulation email templates to refocus your security awareness this august blog
- 2026-08-12Back to school cybersecurity checklist wizer template or tool
- 2026-08-05What is a phishing simulation wizer glossary or explainer
- 2026-07-16Dont take the bait 5 sneaky phishing templates to test in july blog
- 2026-06-05What is deepfake phishing glossary or explainer
- 2026-05-28What is ai phishingexamples how to protect your team glossary or explainer
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page wizer-training.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Wizer
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Wizer; a claim can dispute any of them.
Wizer Free 1
Follow Wizer
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Wizer is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Wizer is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Security Awareness Training That Moves at AI Speed
- For
- organizations and employees
- Price stated
- No credit card required wizer-training.com
- Starting price
- 25 wizer-training.com/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Instant Free Access; Start free; free trial of Boost for 10 days wizer-training.com
- Certifications
- Wizer DIR CertificateWizer DIR 2026-2027 State Certified AI Training Program
- Customers named
- Dura SoftwareConduentGrant Country, New MexicoCoLab Software
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, hosting
What Wizer's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: wizer-training.com, wizer-training.com/pricing, wizer-training.com/use-cases/colab-software. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Wizer's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Wizer, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Wizer by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Wizer is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Wizer, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Wizer is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.ShowHide
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Wizer is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHideWizer is among the products AI models recommend first in Security awareness training this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.