Every category where a model named SecureFlag for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Secure code training	Developer platform	26%	1 of 97	2%	48	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for SecureFlag yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated SecureFlag across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	1	0	2
GPT-5.4 mini	3	0	2	0	5
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	4	0	0	5
Perplexity Sonar	2	1	1	0	4
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	1	2	0	4
Mistral Small	1	0	2	0	3
DeepSeek V4 Flash	3	2	0	1	6
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	1	0	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	1	0	0	2
Kimi K2	0	2	1	0	3
GLM 4.7 FlashX	2	1	0	0	3
MiniMax M2.5	2	0	2	0	4
GPT-6 Luna	3	0	1	0	4
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	1	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct33 labels17

Paraphrase26 labels9

Comparative34 labels17not counted in share

Budget-constrained23 labels7

Scale-constrained19 labels3

Negative21 labels7not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative156 labels in all, every segment counted; 36 of the 60 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“SecureFlag offers the strongest combination of practical depth, modern threat coverage (including AI risks), and workflow integration” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Secure code training · direct prompt · first choice

“SecureFlag and Secure Code Warrior are the leaders when it comes to AI‑code readiness and AI‑software governance” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Secure code training · comparative prompt · first choice

“Choose SecureFlag if you want hands-on labs, workflow integration, threat modeling, and compliance evidence.” GPT-5.4 mini · Secure code training · comparative prompt · first choice

“SecureFlag is particularly noted for its ease of use, practical labs, and straightforward administration” Mistral Small · Secure code training · direct prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Low review volume, limited long-term track record, minor integration issues” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Secure code training · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as SecureFlag, over the 156 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SecureFlag was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Secure Code Warrior118 of 15628Compare →

Security Journey97 of 15610Compare →

SafeStack Academy39 of 1567Compare →

Snyk Learn37 of 1567Compare →

Avatao33 of 1562Not among the top eight

Veracode Security Labs33 of 1560Not among the top eight

AppSecEngineer26 of 1560Not among the top eight

Checkmarx Codebashing24 of 1561Not among the top eight

Codebashing16 of 1560Not among the top eight

Kontra12 of 1560Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SecureFlag. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 155 of the 156 answers that named SecureFlag and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com87

securityjourney.com87

ransomleak.com85

sourceforge.net84

securecodewarrior.com76

secureflag.comYour site72

gartner.com71

us.fitgap.com58

f6s.com56

blog.secureflag.comYour site52

604 of the 728 domain citations in answers naming SecureFlag came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

ransomleak.com/blog/best-secure-coding-training-202684

gartner.com/reviews/market/secure-code-training-tools70

securityjourney.com/secure-development-training49

secureflag.com/training47

sourceforge.net/software/secure-code-training43

blog.secureflag.com/2026/09/25/best-secure-coding-training-platforms42

f6s.com/software/category/secure-coding-training41

g2.com/categories/secure-code-training41

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where SecureFlag stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “secure code training platform”

Position for “secure code training platforms”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 480 a month (“secureflag”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 0 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 935 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 629 · 8 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 989
Paid Google search: 1 searches its ads show for, about 34 clicks and $94 a month (estimate)

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

15 ads · 15 text · 8 shown in the last 30 days

First shown May 2025, as SecureFlag Limited, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 9 in the year, 6 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

26%

rank 1 of 97 in secure code training

First choices

across its categories

Named in: 156 answers
Its own site cited: in 155 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on secureflag.com

334

subdomains included

Content

309

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

7 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	271	17	2026-10-02	IaC, GRC
Report or ebook	17	2	2026-07-17	Secure code training
Case study	8	1	2026-09-16
Podcast or video	8	3	2026-09-08
Comparison	3	1	2026-10-02
Conference or event	1	0	2023-06-01
Glossary or explainer	1	0	2025-11-01

Most recent

2026-10-02Ai coding assistants security blog
2026-10-02Secureflag vs secure code warrior comparison
2026-09-29Threat modeling while code is being written blog
2026-09-25Best secure coding training platforms blog
2026-09-25Secure ai applications owasp aisvs blog
2026-09-23Training where developers write code blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page secureflag.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Names read as SecureFlag

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as SecureFlag; a claim can dispute any of them.

SecureFlag (via OWASP) 1

Follow SecureFlag

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

SecureFlag is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Industry-leading Developer Security Enablement Platform
secureflag.com
For: developers, DevOps, security teams, and engineering leaders
secureflag.com
Price stated: View pricing secureflag.com
Starting price: 270 secureflag.com/pricing
Free plan or trial: Start for free; 7-day free trial secureflag.com/pricing
Certifications: ISOSOC 2PCI DSSHIPAAASVSISO 27001NISTNIST SSDF
Customers named: TalendSurePayAbrantixBetfredHonorlockAdmiralAlogentTide
Not stated on the pages read: Integrations, hosting

What SecureFlag's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: secureflag.com, secureflag.com/pricing, secureflag.com/platform, secureflag.com/resources/case-studies, secureflag.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SecureFlag's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SecureFlag, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for SecureFlag by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where SecureFlag is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name SecureFlag, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

Badges

Wins only: a badge exists where SecureFlag is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.

ShowHide

AI models recommend SecureFlag first in Secure code training this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.

Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges

Show the code

<a href="https://it-ai-index.com/developer/secure-code-training/"><img src="https://it-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/secureflag--secure-code-training-wide.svg" alt="AI models' first choice in Secure code training, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index" width="320" height="104"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Secure code training standing, where the claim can be checked.

Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides

Show the code

<a href="https://it-ai-index.com/developer/secure-code-training/"><img src="https://it-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/secureflag--secure-code-training-square.svg" alt="AI models' first choice in Secure code training, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index" width="240" height="240"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Secure code training standing, where the claim can be checked.

Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer

Show the code

<a href="https://it-ai-index.com/developer/secure-code-training/"><img src="https://it-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/secureflag--secure-code-training-compact.svg" alt="AI models' first choice in Secure code training, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index" width="200" height="56"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Secure code training standing, where the claim can be checked.

Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.