Every category where a model named Hoxhunt for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Security awareness training	Security operations	13%	3 of 65	0%	41	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Hoxhunt yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Hoxhunt across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	1	2
GPT-5.4 mini	0	2	0	2
Gemini 3.5 Flash	2	2	0	4
Perplexity Sonar	1	2	1	4
Grok 4.1 Fast	2	2	1	5
Mistral Small	1	1	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	2	1	2	5
Llama 4 Maverick	0	2	1	3
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	3	0	3
Kimi K2	0	4	0	4
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	2	1	4
MiniMax M2.5	2	0	1	3

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct24 labels8

Paraphrase22 labels7

Comparative29 labels9not counted in share

Budget-constrained10 labels1

Scale-constrained9 labels2

Negative13 labels3not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative107 labels in all, every segment counted; 18 of the 30 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Highest user rating (4.8/5 on G2, 3,685+ reviews), adaptive phishing simulations, strong engagement, and measurable behavior change” Mistral Small · Awareness training · comparative prompt · first choice

“Hoxhunt is the best default pick for a mid-market B2B company that wants modern, behavior-focused phishing awareness training” Perplexity Sonar · Awareness training · direct prompt · first choice

“Shortlist Hoxhunt instead if your leadership specifically cares about *measurable phishing-resistance and reduced human risk*” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Awareness training · direct prompt · first choice

“Top safer bets (high ratings across boards): Hoxhunt, Infosec IQ, Adaptive Security, or Keepnet Labs” Grok 4.1 Fast · Awareness training · negative prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Hoxhunt, over the 107 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Hoxhunt was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

KnowBe4106 of 10741Compare →

Proofpoint ZenGuide83 of 1070Not in the top three

SoSafe47 of 1070Not in the top three

MetaCompliance30 of 1070Not in the top three

Infosec IQ29 of 1073Not in the top three

Huntress Managed Security Awareness Training25 of 1075Not in the top three

Arctic Wolf Managed Security Awareness25 of 1070Not in the top three

Adaptive Security20 of 1070Not in the top three

NINJIO20 of 1070Not in the top three

Mimecast Engage15 of 1070Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Hoxhunt. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 96 of the 107 answers that named Hoxhunt and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

hoxhunt.comYour site81

expertinsights.com72

adaptivesecurity.com62

learn.g2.com48

gartner.com42

brside.com39

g2.com39

knowbe4.com33

easyllama.com31

usecure.io31

397 of the 478 domain citations in answers naming Hoxhunt came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

hoxhunt.com/blog/best-security-awareness-training62

learn.g2.com/best-security-awareness-training-software48

expertinsights.com/security-awareness-training/the-top-security-awareness-training-platfor39

gartner.com/reviews/market/security-awareness-computer-based-training38

expertinsights.com/security-awareness-training/top-security-awareness-content-and-developm35

easyllama.com/blog/best-security-awareness-training-providers31

doozy.live/blog/best-security-awareness-training-platforms25

hoxhunt.com/blog/knowbe4-competitors24

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Hoxhunt's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Hoxhunt, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at hoxhunt.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.