Small business▲+3Since September 2026: 2% → 5%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
5%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 7 → 6 of 62
1 category · RankedHoxhunt
125Judge labels
17First choices
11Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
16% in Awareness training for mid-market buyers
Rank 2 of 64 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
6 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 2% of its 55 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Hoxhunt →By buyer segmentStrongest at mid-market.
Small business7 of 70
4%19 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market2 of 64
16%55 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise2 of 55
14%50 labels
accepted challenger
In awareness training · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Hoxhunt for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Security awareness training | Security operations | 16% | 2 of 64 | 2% | 55 | accepted challenger | ▲+4Since September 2026: 13% → 17%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Hoxhunt held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Awareness training · by segment
Mid-market▲+4Since September 2026: 13% → 17%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
17%from 13% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 3 → 2 of 62
Enterprise▼−13Since September 2026: 28% → 15%, −13 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.
15%from 28% in September 2026
Cleared the floor by 2 pointsRank 2 of 50, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Awareness training | 13% | 17% | ▲+4Since September 2026: 13% → 17%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 3 → 2 of 64 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Hoxhunt across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Hoxhunt across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Grok 4.20 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 5 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Kimi K2 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct33 labels13
Paraphrase20 labels2
Comparative31 labels10not counted in share
Budget-constrained10 labels1
Scale-constrained14 labels1
Negative17 labels5not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative125 labels in all, every segment counted; 17 of the 32 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“If you want a hands-off, highly automated platform that employees actually enjoy and results in genuine behavior change, choose Hoxhunt.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Awareness training · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“1. Hoxhunt – Best for Behavior Change & Engagement ... If you want maximum engagement with minimal admin: Hoxhunt” Kimi K2 · Awareness training · direct prompt · first choice
“Hoxhunt is the strongest default choice if your priority is employee engagement and adaptive phishing training” Perplexity Sonar · Awareness training · direct prompt · first choice
“If you want measurable behavior change with low admin overhead, gamified adaptive simulations point to Hoxhunt.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Awareness training · comparative prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Can create significant ongoing administrative workload for IT and security teams” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Awareness training · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Hoxhunt, over the 125 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Hoxhunt was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Hoxhunt, over the 125 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Hoxhunt was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Hoxhunt. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 123 of the 125 answers that named Hoxhunt and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
hoxhunt.comYour site82
adaptivesecurity.com70
learn.g2.com69
expertinsights.com66
g2.com65
knowbe4.com58
easyllama.com40
riskpublishing.com38
ransomleak.com36
usecure.io31
473 of the 555 domain citations in answers naming Hoxhunt came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
hoxhunt.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Hoxhunt takes 16% of first choices and KnowBe4 takes 45%.ShowHide
Search and answers
hoxhunt.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Hoxhunt takes 16% of first choices and KnowBe4 takes 45%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “security awareness training platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “security awareness training platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 2,900 a month (“hoxhunt”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 31 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 5,772 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 1,341 · 124 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 3,157
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
16%
rank 2 of 64 in awareness training
Segment leader
45%
KnowBe4
- First choices
- 17 across its categories
- Named in
- 125 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 123 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on hoxhunt.com
881
subdomains included
Content
445
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
10 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 272 | 4 | 2026-08-18 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 61 | undated | |||
| Case study | 43 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 16 | 0 | 2025-05-09 | ||
| Report or ebook | 13 | 0 | 2026-05-13 | ||
| Comparison | 13 | 0 | 2026-06-30 | ||
| Podcast or video | 12 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 7 | 0 | 2024-01-28 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 7 | 0 | 2026-04-15 | ||
| News or press | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-08-18Cybersecurity awareness month ideas blog
- 2026-07-29User reported phishing response automation blog
- 2026-07-09World cup 2026 phishing attacks surge 500 blog
- 2026-07-03Repeat offenders phishing blog
- 2026-06-30Hoxhunt vs adaptive security comparison
- 2026-06-24Content studio creates customizable security awareness content blog
Events in person
Last twelve months
- October 27, 2026Hoxhunt at it-sa 2026Exhibition Centre Nuremberg, Nuremberg, Germany · exhibited
- September 24, 2026Hoxhunt Session: You Can't Ban Your Way Out of Shadow AIExCeL London, London, UK · spoke
- September 22, 2026Gartner Security & Risk Management Summit EMEA 2026ExCeL London, London, UK · attended
- August 27, 2026SANS Security Summit 2026 - Exclusive Dinner with HoxhuntThe Palm Las Vegas - Seafood & Steakhouse, Las Vegas, United States · hosted
As the event pages on hoxhunt.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page hoxhunt.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Hoxhunt
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Hoxhunt is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Hoxhunt is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- The next generation of security awareness is designed for employees and built for enterprises.
- For
- employees and enterprises; security teams
- Price stated
- per employee hoxhunt.com/pricing
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type IIGDPR & CCPA CompliantGDPRCCPA
- Customers named
- AvanadeAESBird & BirdVictorinoxElisaKärcherAltisourceDocusign
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting
What Hoxhunt's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: hoxhunt.com, hoxhunt.com/pricing, trust.hoxhunt.com, hoxhunt.com/product/phishing-training, hoxhunt.com/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Hoxhunt's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Hoxhunt, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Hoxhunt by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Hoxhunt is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Hoxhunt, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Hoxhunt is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.ShowHide
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Hoxhunt is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHideHoxhunt is among the products AI models recommend first in Security awareness training this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.