Small business▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 4% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 4 → 9 of 62
1 category · RankedCanIPhish
24Judge labels
5First choices
0Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
4% in Awareness training for small business buyers
Rank 5 of 64 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 6 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business6 of 70
4%18 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market5 of 64
6%6 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In awareness training · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named CanIPhish for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Security awareness training | Security operations | 6% | 5 of 64 | 0% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by KnowBe4 at 45% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, CanIPhish held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Awareness training · by segment
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 14 → 10 of 62
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Awareness training | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 14 → 5 of 64 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated CanIPhish across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated CanIPhish across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative6 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained10 labels5
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative24 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 6 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“If you have 10 or fewer employees: Start with CanIPhish (completely free with full features)” Kimi K2 · Awareness training · budget prompt · first choice
“Choose CanIPhish if you have 10 or fewer employees and want simulations at no cost.” GPT-6 Luna · Awareness training · budget prompt · first choice
“Zero budget to prove value → Wizer free tier or CanIPhish free tier.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Awareness training · budget prompt · first choice
“CanIPhish is identified as the best for self-serve free simulations” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Awareness training · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as CanIPhish, over the 24 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and CanIPhish was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as CanIPhish, over the 24 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and CanIPhish was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named CanIPhish. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 24 of the 24 answers that named CanIPhish and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
hooksecurity.co22
g2.com20
adaptivesecurity.com17
easyllama.com17
learn.g2.com13
expertinsights.com11
guardey.com11
spotsaas.com11
hookphish.com10
knowbe4.com9
141 of the 141 domain citations in answers naming CanIPhish came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
caniphish.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, CanIPhish takes 6% of first choices and KnowBe4 takes 45%.ShowHide
Search and answers
caniphish.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, CanIPhish takes 6% of first choices and KnowBe4 takes 45%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “security awareness training platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “security awareness training platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 320 a month (“caniphish”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 2 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 18,616 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 3,171 · 106 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,097
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
6%
rank 5 of 64 in awareness training
Segment leader
45%
KnowBe4
- First choices
- 5 across its categories
- Named in
- 24 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 24 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on caniphish.com
185
subdomains included
Content
139
counted in the table below
Documentation
6
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 105 | 9 | 2026-09-04 | Awareness training | |
| Glossary or explainer | 28 | 0 | 2026-04-09 | ||
| Comparison | 2 | 0 | 2023-05-20 | ||
| Podcast or video | 2 | 0 | 2025-11-19 | ||
| Report or ebook | 1 | 0 | 2024-11-28 | ||
| Template or tool | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-04How attackers target ai assistants blog
- 2026-09-03Cyber awareness month campaign kit blog
- 2026-08-17Os aware phishing blog
- 2026-08-06Device code phishing blog
- 2026-07-31Email defense price guide blog
- 2026-07-21Zoom phishing blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page caniphish.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow CanIPhish
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
CanIPhish is its own company.ShowHide
The company
CanIPhish is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- A business focused on creating a better way to simulate phishing and deliver security awareness training to employees.
- For
- employees
- Price stated
- Free $0 forever; Professional $32 Min. 11 users /month; Enterprise $40 Min. 25 users /month caniphish.com/pricing
- Starting price
- $0 forever caniphish.com/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Sign up for free; No trial periods, no credit cards, no sales calls, no commitments. caniphish.com
- Integrations claimed
- 2 caniphish.com
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type 2GDPRSOC 2 Type 2 Attestation ReportSOC 3CCPA
- Hosting
- United States of AmericaAustraliaUnited KingdomCanadaSouth AfricaGermanyUnited Arab EmiratesSingapore
- Customers named
- EasygoEverett Community CollegeXLENTCybrary
What CanIPhish's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: caniphish.com, caniphish.com/pricing, caniphish.com/security. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when CanIPhish's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as CanIPhish, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for CanIPhish by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where CanIPhish is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name CanIPhish, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.