Every category where a model named Avatao for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Secure code training	Developer platform	0%	20 of 97	0%	17	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Avatao yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Avatao across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	3	2	5
Mistral Small	2	1	3
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	2	0	2
Kimi K2	1	1	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct10 labels2

Paraphrase8 labels1

Comparative14 labelsNone

Budget-constrained5 labels1

Scale-constrained5 labelsNone

Negative8 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative50 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If you need a more developer-focused, hands-on approach, Avatao and SecureCodingHub are also strong contenders.” Mistral Small · Secure code training · budget prompt · alternative

“EU/mid-sized engineering teams | Gamified labs; standards-aligned (NIS2, ISO).” Grok 4.1 Fast · Secure code training · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“look at Kontra, Avatao, or entry-level Secure Code Warrior” Grok 4.1 Fast · Secure code training · budget prompt · alternative

“Immersive, case‑based breach simulations and broader DevSecOps topics” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Secure code training · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Avatao, over the 50 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Avatao was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Secure Code Warrior36 of 508Not among the top eight

SecureFlag33 of 506Not among the top eight

Security Journey28 of 504Not among the top eight

SafeStack Academy15 of 507Not among the top eight

Snyk Learn15 of 505Not among the top eight

Veracode Security Labs10 of 500Not among the top eight

Wizer7 of 502Not among the top eight

Checkmarx Codebashing5 of 500Not among the top eight

Kontra5 of 500Not among the top eight

RansomLeak5 of 500Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Avatao. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 50 of the 50 answers that named Avatao and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

ransomleak.com44

sourceforge.net40

g2.com36

slashdot.org30

f6s.com28

securityjourney.com27

gartner.com25

us.fitgap.com25

topbusinesssoftware.com19

blog.secureflag.com14

No domain is on file for Avatao, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

ransomleak.com/blog/best-secure-coding-training-202644

f6s.com/software/category/secure-coding-training24

gartner.com/reviews/market/secure-code-training-tools23

sourceforge.net/software/secure-code-training23

us.fitgap.com/search/secure-code-training-software/small-business19

securityjourney.com/secure-development-training17

sourceforge.net/software/compare/HCL-AppScan-vs-Synopsys-Security-Training17

slashdot.org/software/secure-code-training/f-mid-size-business15

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where Avatao stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Searches for its name, Google: 40 a month (“avatao”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 0 a month
Its own site: No site of its own on file, so no site figures

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 20 of 97 in secure code training

Segment leader

26%

SecureFlag

First choices: 4 across its categories
Named in: 50 answers
Its own site cited: No site on file to match

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Follow Avatao

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Avatao's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Avatao, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Avatao by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Avatao is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Avatao, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.