Every category where a model named SoSafe for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Security awareness training	Security operations	0%	11 of 65	0%	20	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for SoSafe yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated SoSafe across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	1	2
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	2	0	2
Perplexity Sonar	2	1	3
Grok 4.1 Fast	2	1	3
Mistral Small	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	2	2
Llama 4 Maverick	1	1	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	1
Kimi K2	1	1	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct8 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative25 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained6 labelsNone

Scale-constrained4 labelsNone

Negative11 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative55 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Hoxhunt or SoSafe | High engagement & automated operation ... Cons: Premium pricing compared to basic platforms.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Awareness training · scale prompt · alternative

“Best for: Privacy-first organizations (especially in the EU) and psychological-science-driven training.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Awareness training · comparative prompt · alternative

“Good for multinational companies needing localized content and compliance alignment.” Mistral Small · Awareness training · comparative prompt · alternative

“Alternatives if avoiding: Hoxhunt ..., SoSafe, or MetaCompliance (both 4.6/5)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Awareness training · negative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as SoSafe, over the 55 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SoSafe was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

KnowBe453 of 5522Not in the top three

Hoxhunt47 of 5515Not in the top three

Proofpoint ZenGuide44 of 550Not in the top three

MetaCompliance22 of 550Not in the top three

Infosec IQ20 of 550Not in the top three

Huntress Managed Security Awareness Training18 of 555Not in the top three

Arctic Wolf Managed Security Awareness18 of 550Not in the top three

Adaptive Security14 of 550Not in the top three

NINJIO12 of 550Not in the top three

Wizer8 of 553Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SoSafe. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 51 of the 55 answers that named SoSafe and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

hoxhunt.com45

expertinsights.com37

learn.g2.com35

adaptivesecurity.com34

brside.com30

g2.com29

gartner.com26

usecure.io23

knowbe4.com22

ransomleak.com21

302 of the 302 domain citations in answers naming SoSafe came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

hoxhunt.com/blog/best-security-awareness-training44

learn.g2.com/best-security-awareness-training-software35

expertinsights.com/security-awareness-training/the-top-security-awareness-training-platfor29

expertinsights.com/security-awareness-training/top-security-awareness-content-and-developm26

gartner.com/reviews/market/security-awareness-computer-based-training25

easyllama.com/blog/best-security-awareness-training-providers20

brside.com/blog/best-cybersecurity-awareness-training-platforms18

doozy.live/blog/best-security-awareness-training-platforms17

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SoSafe's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SoSafe, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at sosafe-awareness.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.