IT AI Index
Index Vendors › KnowBe4 · September 2026 Edition
2 categories · Ranked

KnowBe4

182Judge labels
59First choices
52Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
2Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
65% in Awareness training for enterprise buyers
Rank 1 of 65 in the mid-market standingendorsed leader
7 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 20% of its 59 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentStrongest at enterprise.
In awareness training · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named KnowBe4 for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Security awareness trainingSecurity operations42%1 of 6520%59endorsed leader
Email securitySecurity operations0%16 of 710%3under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Defender for Office 365 at 31%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for KnowBe4 yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated KnowBe4 across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.511103
GPT-5.4 mini30126
Gemini 3.5 Flash03025
Perplexity Sonar22105
Grok 4.1 Fast30126
Mistral Small22116
DeepSeek V4 Flash31116
Llama 4 Maverick11204
Qwen 3.7 Flash22026
Kimi K241016
GLM 4.7 FlashX30014
MiniMax M2.522105

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct32 labels17
Paraphrase38 labels28
Comparative35 labels18not counted in share
Budget-constrained33 labels11
Scale-constrained16 labels3
Negative28 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative182 labels in all, every segment counted; 59 of the 77 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Start with KnowBe4 if you want proven scale, vast resources, and B2B compliance ease—it's the safe, high-adoption choice for most mid-market firms.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Awareness training · direct prompt · first choice
“KnowBe4 is the top recommendation due to its balance of ease of use, comprehensive features, and strong track record in the mid-market segment” Mistral Small · Awareness training · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“the best phishing simulation and training tool for a mid-sized B2B company would be KnowBe4, as it is recommended for SMB and mid-market breadth” Llama 4 Maverick · Awareness training · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“KnowBe4 – Best Overall for Mid-Market ... Start with KnowBe4 if you want proven, comprehensive coverage with transparent pricing” Kimi K2 · Awareness training · direct prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Trustpilot Rating: 1.9/5 stars, with 85% of reviews being 1-star... training content is outdated, repetitive, and of poor quality” Mistral Small · Awareness training · negative prompt · hard negative
“Here are the primary platforms you should be cautious about... KnowBe4 has extremely low ratings on user-driven consumer sites” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Awareness training · negative prompt · hard negative
“The admin panel is notoriously complex and clunky... gates its advanced AI features... behind its more expensive Diamond tier, which can quickly inflate the cost.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Awareness training · direct prompt · soft negative
“KnowBe4 — widely used and often effective, but review feedback shows some users strongly dislike the realism/obviousness of simulations and report false positives” GPT-5.4 mini · Awareness training · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as KnowBe4, over the 182 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and KnowBe4 was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Proofpoint ZenGuide108 of 1820Not in the top three
Hoxhunt106 of 18218Compare →
SoSafe53 of 1822Not in the top three
Huntress Managed Security Awareness Training52 of 18210Not in the top three
Hook Security49 of 18218Not in the top three
Wizer42 of 18220Compare →
MetaCompliance35 of 1820Not in the top three
Infosec IQ34 of 1823Not in the top three
Arctic Wolf Managed Security Awareness29 of 1820Not in the top three
CanIPhish27 of 1823Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named KnowBe4. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 157 of the 182 answers that named KnowBe4 and are not a share of its labels.

Names read as KnowBe4

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as KnowBe4; a claim can dispute any of them.
KnowBe4 Silver 2KnowBe4 (Silver tier) 1KnowBe4 Security Awareness 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when KnowBe4's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as KnowBe4, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at knowbe4.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.