| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Security awareness training | Security operations | 42% | 1 of 65 | 20% | 59 | endorsed leader |
| Email security | Security operations | 0% | 16 of 71 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Defender for Office 365 at 31% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 6 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 5 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 6 |
| Mistral Small | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6 |
| Kimi K2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Start with KnowBe4 if you want proven scale, vast resources, and B2B compliance ease—it's the safe, high-adoption choice for most mid-market firms.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Awareness training · direct prompt · first choice
“KnowBe4 is the top recommendation due to its balance of ease of use, comprehensive features, and strong track record in the mid-market segment” Mistral Small · Awareness training · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“the best phishing simulation and training tool for a mid-sized B2B company would be KnowBe4, as it is recommended for SMB and mid-market breadth” Llama 4 Maverick · Awareness training · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“KnowBe4 – Best Overall for Mid-Market ... Start with KnowBe4 if you want proven, comprehensive coverage with transparent pricing” Kimi K2 · Awareness training · direct prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Trustpilot Rating: 1.9/5 stars, with 85% of reviews being 1-star... training content is outdated, repetitive, and of poor quality” Mistral Small · Awareness training · negative prompt · hard negative
“Here are the primary platforms you should be cautious about... KnowBe4 has extremely low ratings on user-driven consumer sites” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Awareness training · negative prompt · hard negative
“The admin panel is notoriously complex and clunky... gates its advanced AI features... behind its more expensive Diamond tier, which can quickly inflate the cost.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Awareness training · direct prompt · soft negative
“KnowBe4 — widely used and often effective, but review feedback shows some users strongly dislike the realism/obviousness of simulations and report false positives” GPT-5.4 mini · Awareness training · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 157 of the 182 answers that named KnowBe4 and are not a share of its labels.
630 of the 686 domain citations in answers naming KnowBe4 came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when KnowBe4's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as KnowBe4, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at knowbe4.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.