Small business▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 12 → 10 of 62
1 category · Rankedusecure
19Judge labels
1First choices
2Negative labels
7 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Awareness training for small business buyers
Rank 22 of 64 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 4 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business10 of 70
2%12 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market22 of 64
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise54 of 55
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
In awareness training · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named usecure for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Security awareness training | Security operations | 0% | 22 of 64 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by KnowBe4 at 45% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, usecure held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Awareness training · by segment
Mid-market▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 8 → 22 of 62
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 16 → 49 of 50
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Awareness training | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 8 → 22 of 64 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated usecure across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated usecure across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct4 labelsNone
Paraphrase2 labels1
Comparative4 labelsNone
Budget-constrained3 labelsNone
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative19 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“If you need to track employee policy sign-offs for SOC 2/ISO 27001 compliance while running training, choose usecure.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Awareness training · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“evaluate PhishingBox / usecure / Huntress for SMB-focused plans” GPT-5.4 mini · Awareness training · budget prompt · alternative
“Best "Set-and-Forget" Automation” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Awareness training · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as usecure, over the 19 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and usecure was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as usecure, over the 19 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and usecure was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named usecure. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 19 of the 19 answers that named usecure and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
usecure.ioYour site15
adaptivesecurity.com14
g2.com14
knowbe4.com10
guardey.com8
hooksecurity.co7
reddit.com7
gartner.com6
huntress.com6
learn.g2.com6
Seventy-eight of the ninety-three domain citations in answers naming usecure came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
usecure.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, usecure takes 0% of first choices and KnowBe4 takes 45%.ShowHide
Search and answers
usecure.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, usecure takes 0% of first choices and KnowBe4 takes 45%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “security awareness training platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “security awareness training platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 480 a month (“usecure”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 4 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 6,690 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 1,182 · 91 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 2,006
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 22 of 64 in awareness training
Segment leader
45%
KnowBe4
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 19 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 19 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on usecure.io
3,089
subdomains included
Content
693
counted in the table below
Documentation
336
Product · Integration
12 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 570 | 26 | 2026-09-25 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 60 | 0 | 2025-11-19 | ||
| Case study | 16 | 9 | 2026-09-28 | ||
| Report or ebook | 15 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 15 | 0 | 2023-03-07 | ||
| Comparison | 11 | 4 | 2026-09-11 | ||
| Conference or event | 3 | 0 | 2025-04-11 | ||
| Podcast or video | 2 | 0 | 2022-04-04 | ||
| Template or tool | 1 | 0 | 2026-02-17 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-28Emt distribution delivers effective policy management with minimal admin case study
- 2026-09-28How usecure helped humankind achieve a 61 reduction in risk score in six months case study
- 2026-09-28Techwyse achieves 99 4 phishing resilience and strengthens cyber awareness with usecure case study
- 2026-09-28Usecure helps it visionaren train 100s of end users with little admin overhead case study
- 2026-09-25How focus technology europe cut client risk scores from 85 to under 20 with usecure blog
- 2026-09-25Nothing left to fix the usecure show episode 9 blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page usecure.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as usecure
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as usecure; a claim can dispute any of them.
Usecure 1usecure (uLearn & uPhish) 1
Follow usecure
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
usecure is its own company.ShowHide
The company
usecure is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Automated human risk management platform for MSPs and IT teams to reduce cyber risk, prove compliance and save time with training, phishing and policies.
- For
- MSPs and IT teams
- Price stated
- All core features included in one simple plan; Flexible monthly billing for MSPs; Simple pricing for internal IT teams usecure.io/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Get Started Free usecure.io
- Certifications
- ISO 27001SOC 2
- Customers named
- Wealth AssociatesG2.comCapterraMSPs15,000+ organisations worldwideAscendTechWyseHeffron
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, integrations, hosting
What usecure's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: usecure.io, usecure.io/pricing, trust.usecure.io, usecure.io/product/ulearn, usecure.io/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when usecure's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as usecure, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for usecure by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where usecure is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name usecure, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.