IT AI Index

Index › Vendors › usecure · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

usecure

13Judge labels

1First choices

0Negative labels

8 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

4 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. usecure was named 4 times in Awareness training, where KnowBe4 led with 42%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business12 of 50

under the label threshold

Mid-market8 of 65

under the label threshold

Enterprise17 of 44

under the label threshold

In awareness training · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named usecure for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Security awareness training	Security operations	2%	8 of 65	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by KnowBe4 at 42%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for usecure yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated usecure across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	2	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained3 labels1

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative5 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative13 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If you have a tiny budget and want zero admin upkeep: Go with uSecure.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Awareness training · budget prompt · first choice

“consider usecure, SoSafe, or Riot” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Awareness training · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as usecure, over the 13 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and usecure was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

KnowBe411 of 133Not in the top three

Hoxhunt9 of 131Not in the top three

SoSafe7 of 131Not in the top three

Proofpoint ZenGuide7 of 130Not in the top three

Hook Security6 of 134Not in the top three

Wizer6 of 133Not in the top three

CanIPhish6 of 130Not in the top three

Huntress Managed Security Awareness Training5 of 132Not in the top three

Adaptive Security4 of 131Not in the top three

Arctic Wolf Managed Security Awareness4 of 130Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named usecure. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 11 of the 13 answers that named usecure and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

usecure.ioYour site9

adaptivesecurity.com8

hoxhunt.com8

brside.com7

expertinsights.com6

hooksecurity.co5

ransomleak.com5

gartner.com4

learn.g2.com4

cipherssecurity.com3

Fifty of the fifty-nine domain citations in answers naming usecure came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

hoxhunt.com/blog/best-security-awareness-training7

usecure.io/blog/knowbe4-security-alternatives6

expertinsights.com/security-awareness-training/the-top-security-awareness-training-platfor5

expertinsights.com/security-awareness-training/top-security-awareness-content-and-developm4

hooksecurity.co/blog/best-security-awareness-training-small-business4

learn.g2.com/best-security-awareness-training-software4

adaptivesecurity.com/blog/how-to-choose-a-cybersecurity-awareness-training-platform3

adaptivesecurity.com/blog/security-awareness-training-platforms3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as usecure

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as usecure; a claim can dispute any of them.

uSecure 2

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when usecure's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as usecure, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at usecure.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.