Every category where a model named Adaptive Security for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Security awareness training	Security operations	0%	13 of 65	0%	12	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Adaptive Security yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Adaptive Security across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	2	3
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	1	1	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative9 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained4 labelsNone

Negative6 labels2not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative22 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Top safer bets (high ratings across boards): Hoxhunt, Infosec IQ, Adaptive Security, or Keepnet Labs” Grok 4.1 Fast · Awareness training · negative prompt · alternative

“Adaptive, role-specific micro-learning (e.g., Hoxhunt, Adaptive Security, IRONSCALES).” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Awareness training · negative prompt · alternative

“Purpose-built for mid-market (200-10,000+ employees). Strong AI capabilities” MiniMax M2.5 · Awareness training · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“differentiated by AI-native, multi-channel simulation” Perplexity Sonar · Awareness training · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Adaptive Security, over the 22 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Adaptive Security was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

KnowBe421 of 229Not in the top three

Hoxhunt20 of 229Not in the top three

Proofpoint ZenGuide18 of 220Not in the top three

SoSafe14 of 220Not in the top three

Arctic Wolf Managed Security Awareness8 of 220Not in the top three

Huntress Managed Security Awareness Training8 of 220Not in the top three

Infosec IQ8 of 220Not in the top three

MetaCompliance7 of 220Not in the top three

Cofense PhishMe5 of 220Not in the top three

NINJIO5 of 220Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Adaptive Security. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 21 of the 22 answers that named Adaptive Security and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

adaptivesecurity.comYour site20

expertinsights.com19

hoxhunt.com19

brside.com13

learn.g2.com12

gartner.com11

usecure.io10

knowbe4.com7

g2.com6

doozy.live5

102 of the 122 domain citations in answers naming Adaptive Security came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

hoxhunt.com/blog/best-security-awareness-training17

expertinsights.com/security-awareness-training/the-top-security-awareness-training-platfor14

learn.g2.com/best-security-awareness-training-software12

gartner.com/reviews/market/security-awareness-computer-based-training11

expertinsights.com/security-awareness-training/top-security-awareness-content-and-developm10

adaptivesecurity.com/blog/security-awareness-training-platforms9

brside.com/blog/best-cybersecurity-awareness-training-platforms7

brside.com/blog/the-best-security-awareness-training-platforms--an-honest-comparison6

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Adaptive Security's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Adaptive Security, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at adaptivesecurity.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.