Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 41 → 29 of 62
1 category · Named, not rankedNINJIO
18Judge labels
0First choices
4Negative labels
9 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
6 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. NINJIO was named 6 times in Awareness training, where KnowBe4 led with 45%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business25 of 70
0%8 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market21 of 64
0%6 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise19 of 55
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
In awareness training · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named NINJIO for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Security awareness training | Security operations | 0% | 21 of 64 | 17% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by KnowBe4 at 45% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, NINJIO held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Awareness training · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 12 → 20 of 62
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 14 → 18 of 50
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Awareness training | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 12 → 21 of 64 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated NINJIO across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated NINJIO across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative8 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative4 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative18 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Modern platforms (such as Hoxhunt, Ninjio, or Wizer) use automation to dynamically adjust the difficulty” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Awareness training · negative prompt · alternative
“Infosec IQ, SANS, and NINJIO are strong choices for regulated industries” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Awareness training · comparative prompt · alternative
“Extremely engaging content; low time commitment; good for tight budgets.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Awareness training · comparative prompt · alternative
“Choose NINJIO or Huntress if you have a non-technical workforce” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Awareness training · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Limited phishing simulation capability – strong on storytelling but weak on practical simulation tools” Kimi K2 · Awareness training · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as NINJIO, over the 18 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and NINJIO was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as NINJIO, over the 18 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and NINJIO was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named NINJIO. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 18 of the 18 answers that named NINJIO and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
adaptivesecurity.com13
g2.com12
hoxhunt.com10
expertinsights.com9
knowbe4.com9
learn.g2.com9
brside.com6
defendify.com6
ransomleak.com6
usecure.io6
Eighty-six of the eighty-six domain citations in answers naming NINJIO came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
ninjio.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, NINJIO takes 0% of first choices and KnowBe4 takes 45%.ShowHide
Search and answers
ninjio.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, NINJIO takes 0% of first choices and KnowBe4 takes 45%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “security awareness training platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “security awareness training platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 1,900 a month (“ninjio”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 43 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 763 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 91 · 13 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 881
- Paid Google search
- 2 searches its ads show for, about 58 clicks and $2,032 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 21 of 64 in awareness training
Segment leader
45%
KnowBe4
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 18 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 18 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on ninjio.com
882
subdomains included
Content
555
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 336 | 19 | 2026-09-25 | Awareness training | |
| News or press | 190 | 0 | 2026-06-10 | Awareness training | |
| Case study | 11 | 0 | 2026-01-15 | ||
| Podcast or video | 6 | 0 | 2026-02-23 | ||
| Report or ebook | 4 | 0 | 2025-11-10 | ||
| Conference or event | 3 | 0 | 2024-05-07 | ||
| Comparison | 3 | 1 | 2026-08-20 | SAST | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 1 | 0 | 2026-05-28 | ||
| Template or tool | 1 | 0 | 2022-09-26 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-25Soc 2 type ii security awareness training blog
- 2026-09-22Business transitions cyberattacks blog
- 2026-09-17Security awareness training admin time blog
- 2026-09-15Hipaa security awareness training requirements blog
- 2026-09-11Business continuity human layer blog
- 2026-09-04The state of secure building 2026 blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page ninjio.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as NINJIO
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as NINJIO; a claim can dispute any of them.
Ninjio 2
Follow NINJIO
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
NINJIO is its own company.ShowHide
The company
NINJIO is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Cybersecurity Awareness Training & Human Risk Management
- For
- Organizations
- Free plan or trial
- Get 3 Free Episodes ninjio.com
- Certifications
- NISTISOSOC
- Customers named
- NFP InsuranceLegendary EntertainmentYoungstown State University
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, integrations, hosting
What NINJIO's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: ninjio.com, trust.ninjio.com, ninjio.com/case-studies, ninjio.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when NINJIO's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as NINJIO, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for NINJIO by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where NINJIO is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name NINJIO, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.