Every category where a model named Infosec IQ for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Security awareness training	Security operations	4%	6 of 65	11%	19	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Infosec IQ yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Infosec IQ across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	1	1	2
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	3	0	0	3
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	2	1	0	3
Mistral Small	1	0	1	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	2	1	4
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	1	0	0	2
Kimi K2	0	0	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct6 labels2

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative15 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained5 labels1

Scale-constrained3 labelsNone

Negative5 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative36 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Highly recommended for mid-market organizations due to its broad awareness catalog, role-based learning paths, and scalability.” Mistral Small · Awareness training · direct prompt · first choice

“Infosec IQ is frequently cited as the best-fit platform for mid-market B2B companies” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Awareness training · direct prompt · first choice

“Top safer bets (high ratings across boards): Hoxhunt, Infosec IQ, Adaptive Security, or Keepnet Labs” Grok 4.1 Fast · Awareness training · negative prompt · alternative

“Choose Infosec IQ for role-based training in a mid-market environment” Perplexity Sonar · Awareness training · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“mentions frustrations with phishing workflows, API/integration limitations, poor support communication, and sluggishness” GPT-5.4 mini · Awareness training · negative prompt · soft negative

“receive more lukewarm mixed reviews, with recurring themes of complexity, dated content, and setup overhead” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Awareness training · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Infosec IQ, over the 36 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Infosec IQ was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

KnowBe434 of 3616Not in the top three

Hoxhunt29 of 3610Not in the top three

Proofpoint ZenGuide28 of 360Not in the top three

SoSafe20 of 360Not in the top three

MetaCompliance15 of 360Not in the top three

Arctic Wolf Managed Security Awareness11 of 360Not in the top three

NINJIO9 of 360Not in the top three

Adaptive Security8 of 360Not in the top three

Cofense PhishMe8 of 360Not in the top three

Mimecast Engage8 of 360Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Infosec IQ. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 33 of the 36 answers that named Infosec IQ and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

hoxhunt.com27

expertinsights.com22

adaptivesecurity.com21

learn.g2.com19

brside.com17

gartner.com17

doozy.live15

easyllama.com14

g2.com14

knowbe4.com11

177 of the 177 domain citations in answers naming Infosec IQ came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

hoxhunt.com/blog/best-security-awareness-training23

learn.g2.com/best-security-awareness-training-software19

expertinsights.com/security-awareness-training/top-security-awareness-content-and-developm17

gartner.com/reviews/market/security-awareness-computer-based-training17

doozy.live/blog/best-security-awareness-training-platforms15

expertinsights.com/security-awareness-training/the-top-security-awareness-training-platfor15

easyllama.com/blog/best-security-awareness-training-providers14

brside.com/blog/best-cybersecurity-awareness-training-platforms10

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Infosec IQ

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Infosec IQ; a claim can dispute any of them.

Infosec IQ (Infosec) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Infosec IQ's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Infosec IQ, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at infosec.qa is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.