AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Tenable Vulnerability Management › Alternatives · October 2026 Edition
One category · what the models named instead

Alternatives to Tenable Vulnerability Management, as AI models named them

In the October 2026 Edition, 181 of the 252 answers collected in the one category where Tenable Vulnerability Management holds a standing named it neither as a first choice nor as an alternative. These are the products those answers put first, category by category and buyer by buyer. The output is the models' output.

Named instead, most often
First choices in the 181 answers that did not name Tenable Vulnerability Management, every category and segment above added together; a product can be counted in several. Each category below keeps its own denominator.

Vulnerability management platforms

Security operations. Six framings, fourteen models, one answer each per buyer segment; an answer counts here when Tenable Vulnerability Management is not its first choice or an alternative in it.
Small businessTenable Vulnerability Management is #7 of 11 here at 4% of first choices, 37 labels.

Seventy-six of the eighty-four answers did not name Tenable Vulnerability Management; it was the first choice in three. The first choices in those seventy-six answers, seventeen products in all, the eight most named:

9 more in the record.The full small business standing →
Mid-marketTenable Vulnerability Management is #2 of 10 here at 16% of first choices, 61 labels.

Fifty-four of the eighty-four answers did not name Tenable Vulnerability Management; it was the first choice in fifteen. The first choices in those fifty-four answers, fifteen products in all, the eight most named:

7 more in the record.The full mid-market standing →
EnterpriseTenable Vulnerability Management is #2 of 9 here at 32% of first choices, 57 labels.

Fifty-one of the eighty-four answers did not name Tenable Vulnerability Management; it was the first choice in twenty-six. The first choices in those fifty-one answers, seven products in all:

The full enterprise standing →

How to read this

A category is asked six ways of each of fourteen models on behalf of each buyer segment, so a segment is eighty-four answers. An answer belongs on this page when the judge labeled Tenable Vulnerability Management neither its first choice nor an alternative in it; the products listed are the first choices those answers made, counted once per answer. An answer that named nothing first, or named Tenable Vulnerability Management only in passing, is in the denominator and adds to no product. The counts are not the category standing, which is on the category page with its share and rank; they are the same record read from Tenable Vulnerability Management's side.

Every answer and every label behind these figures is in the record, sent on request. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index, and a product named instead of Tenable Vulnerability Management was named by a model, not endorsed by anyone.