Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 43 → 23 of 76
SecPod · 2 categories · Named, not rankedSecPod SanerNow
15Judge labels
2First choices
1Negative labels
7 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
8 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. SecPod SanerNow was named 8 times in Vuln management and 1 other category, where Rapid7 InsightVM led with 30%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business24 of 82
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market12 of 77
4%5 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise48 of 68
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In vuln management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named SecPod SanerNow for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vulnerability management platforms | Security operations | 4% | 12 of 77 | 20% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Rapid7 InsightVM at 30% | ▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Attack surface management | Security operations | 0% | 33 of 100 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Intruder at 49% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, SecPod SanerNow held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Vuln management · by segment
Mid-market▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 54 → 10 of 74
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vuln management | 0% | 4% | ▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 54 → 12 of 77 |
| ASM | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 29 → 33 of 100 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated SecPod SanerNow across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated SecPod SanerNow across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 label1
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative7 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained3 labels1
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative15 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Vicarius vRx or SecPod SanerNow | Combines scanning and patching natively so you don't have to manage multiple consoles.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Vuln management · direct prompt · first choice
“Next-Gen / Unified VM & Patching (Highly recommended for 500-person companies): SecPod SanerNow, Action1, or PDQ.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Vuln management · scale prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“they also do not offer patchless protection... you may be left exposed” Mistral Small · Vuln management · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as SecPod SanerNow, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SecPod SanerNow was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as SecPod SanerNow, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SecPod SanerNow was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SecPod SanerNow. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 14 of the 15 answers that named SecPod SanerNow and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
secpod.comYour site7
upguard.com6
vicarius.io6
riskpublishing.com5
esecurityplanet.com4
g2.com4
orca.security4
paloaltonetworks.com4
riskwatch.com4
complytec.com3
Forty of the forty-seven domain citations in answers naming SecPod SanerNow came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Follow SecPod SanerNow
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
SecPod is the company behind SecPod SanerNow.ShowHide
The company
SecPod is the company behind SecPod SanerNow.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- recognized as a Leader and Outperformer in the 2024 GigaOm Radar for Patch Management
- For
- enterprises and organizations of all sizes
- Free plan or trial
- Free Trial secpod.com/newsroom/secpod-saner-now-named-leader-and-outperformer-in-giga-om-s-patch-management-report
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers
What SecPod SanerNow's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: secpod.com/newsroom/secpod-saner-now-named-leader-and-outperformer-in-giga-om-s-patch-management-report, community.secpod.com/forums/topic/sanernow-highlight. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SecPod SanerNow's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SecPod SanerNow, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for SecPod SanerNow by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where SecPod SanerNow is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name SecPod SanerNow, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.