IT AI Index
Index Vendors › Squadcast · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Squadcast

63Judge labels
12First choices
1Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
13% in Incidents for small business buyers
Rank 3 of 53 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 25 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentStrongest at small business.
In incidents · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Squadcast for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Incident management and on-callIT operations and endpoint10%3 of 530%25accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Squadcast yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Squadcast across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.511002
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash02002
Perplexity Sonar01001
Grok 4.1 Fast04105
Mistral Small11103
DeepSeek V4 Flash11002
Llama 4 Maverick00101
Qwen 3.7 Flash11002
Kimi K212003
GLM 4.7 FlashX01102
MiniMax M2.502002

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct8 labels2
Paraphrase8 labels2
Comparative13 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained22 labels8
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative9 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative63 labels in all, every segment counted; 12 of the 14 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Squadcast is widely considered the top choice for startups because it balances robust enterprise features with accessible pricing.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Incidents · budget prompt · first choice
“Spike at $7/user or Squadcast with its free tier offer the best balance of features and affordability” Kimi K2 · Incidents · budget prompt · first choice
“Squadcast — If you need a full-featured platform at the lowest realistic price point” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Incidents · budget prompt · first choice
“For budget-conscious DevOps teams that just need solid on-call, Squadcast stands out.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Incidents · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Squadcast, over the 62 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Squadcast was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Better Stack37 of 6210Not in the top three
Rootly33 of 625Not in the top three
Hyperping25 of 625Not in the top three
Opsgenie25 of 622Not in the top three
Grafana IRM21 of 620Not in the top three
Jira Service Management20 of 620Not in the top three
FireHydrant17 of 620Not in the top three
Spike.sh14 of 622Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Squadcast. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 55 of the 62 answers that named Squadcast and are not a share of its labels.

Names read as Squadcast

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Squadcast; a claim can dispute any of them.
Squadcast Pro 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Squadcast's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Squadcast, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at squadcast.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack