Every category where a model named Codebashing for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Secure code training	Developer platform	0%	24 of 97	0%	6	under 10 labels · led by SecureFlag at 26%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Codebashing yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Codebashing across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	2	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct4 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative9 labels2not counted in share

Budget-constrained4 labelsNone

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative3 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative23 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“### 1. Codebashing Best for: Gamified micro-learning and developer engagement.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Secure code training · comparative prompt · first choice

“Codebashing is Checkmarx's in-context eLearning platform that sharpens the skills developers need to fix vulnerabilities and write secure code” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Secure code training · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Codebashing, over the 23 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Codebashing was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

SecureFlag16 of 238Not among the top eight

Secure Code Warrior16 of 235Not among the top eight

Security Journey16 of 231Not among the top eight

Veracode Security Labs9 of 230Not among the top eight

Snyk Learn7 of 232Not among the top eight

SafeStack Academy5 of 231Not among the top eight

Avatao4 of 230Not among the top eight

PortSwigger Web Security Academy3 of 231Not among the top eight

AppSecEngineer3 of 230Not among the top eight

Checkmarx Codebashing3 of 230Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Codebashing. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 23 of the 23 answers that named Codebashing and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

ransomleak.com14

g2.com13

sourceforge.net13

gartner.com12

securityjourney.com12

f6s.com11

secureflag.com11

checkmarx.com9

peerspot.com9

securecodewarrior.com8

112 of the 112 domain citations in answers naming Codebashing came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

ransomleak.com/blog/best-secure-coding-training-202614

gartner.com/reviews/market/secure-code-training-tools11

f6s.com/software/category/secure-coding-training9

secureflag.com/training9

checkmarx.com/product/codebashing-secure-code-training8

peerspot.com/categories/application-security-training7

securityjourney.com/secure-development-training7

sourceforge.net/software/secure-code-training7

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

codebashing.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Codebashing takes 0% of first choices and SecureFlag takes 26%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “secure code training platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “secure code training platforms”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 70 a month (“codebashing”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 5 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 33 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 8 · 3 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 711
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on Google

None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 24 of 97 in secure code training

Segment leader

26%

SecureFlag

First choices: 0 across its categories
Named in: 23 answers
Its own site cited: in 23 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Names read as Codebashing

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Codebashing; a claim can dispute any of them.

Codebashing by Checkmarx 1

Follow Codebashing

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Codebashing is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Turn Your Developers Into AppSec Champions; Involve your developers as equal partners in your AppSec program to establish trust and ensure secure software development.
codebashing.com
For: developers
codebashing.com
Price stated: Buy now on AWS codebashing.com
Free plan or trial: Get A Free Demo codebashing.com
Customers named: European Financial Services Institution
Not stated on the pages read: Starting price, integrations, certifications, hosting

What Codebashing's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: codebashing.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Codebashing's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Codebashing, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Codebashing by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Codebashing is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Codebashing, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.