AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Secure Code Warrior · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Secure Code Warrior

153Judge labels
27First choices
46Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
33% in Secure code training for enterprise buyers
Rank 2 of 97 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
3 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 20% of its 51 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Secure Code Warrior →
By buyer segmentStrongest at enterprise.
In secure code training · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Secure Code Warrior for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Secure code trainingDeveloper platform18%2 of 9720%51accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Secure Code Warrior yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Secure Code Warrior across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.510203
GPT-5.4 mini02024
Gemini 3.5 Flash41016
Perplexity Sonar11103
Grok 4.1 Fast22015
Mistral Small10102
DeepSeek V4 Flash21025
Llama 4 Maverick00202
Qwen 3.7 Flash10023
Kimi K212115
GLM 4.7 FlashX11002
MiniMax M2.501203
GPT-6 Luna12104
Muse Glimmer 30B30014

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct34 labels12
Paraphrase16 labels7
Comparative35 labels20not counted in share
Budget-constrained23 labels4
Scale-constrained16 labels4
Negative29 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative153 labels in all, every segment counted; 27 of the 48 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“look for platforms that offer hands-on "break-fix" labs (like SecureFlag or AppSecEngineer) or highly gamified developer-first tournaments (like Secure Code Warrior)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Secure code training · negative prompt · first choice
“Secure Code Warrior: Highly gamified, excellent language/framework coverage, and has rolled out extensive modules for securing AI-assisted coding.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Secure code training · scale prompt · first choice
“Prioritize platforms that scale well for mid-sized enterprises (e.g., Secure Code Warrior, Security Journey, SecureFlag, Veracode Security Labs)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Secure code training · scale prompt · first choice
“Secure Code Warrior’s gamified, trust‑scored approach makes it ideal for organizations wanting strong developer engagement” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Secure code training · comparative prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Secure Code Warrior has the most consistent negative feedback and is the one I'd be most cautious about.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Secure code training · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid Secure Code Warrior unless your budget comfortably exceeds $50k/year” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Secure code training · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“Trustpilot includes recent complaints that the training feels more like testing than teaching. So I wouldn't call it a scam; I'd just recommend piloting it before buying enterprise-wide.” GPT-5.4 mini · Secure code training · negative prompt · soft negative
“the caution points that come up repeatedly are: dated / repetitive challenge content, limited language/framework coverage for some stacks, reporting and LMS integration friction” Muse Glimmer 30B · Secure code training · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Secure Code Warrior, over the 153 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Secure Code Warrior was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Veracode Security Labs40 of 1530Not among the top eight
Avatao36 of 1530Not among the top eight
AppSecEngineer24 of 1530Not among the top eight
Checkmarx Codebashing23 of 1530Not among the top eight
Codebashing16 of 1531Not among the top eight
SANS14 of 1530Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Secure Code Warrior. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 149 of the 153 answers that named Secure Code Warrior and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com93
ransomleak.com91
sourceforge.net89
securecodewarrior.comYour site88
securityjourney.com88
gartner.com78
us.fitgap.com60
f6s.com59
secureflag.com58
slashdot.org51

667 of the 755 domain citations in answers naming Secure Code Warrior came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

securecodewarrior.com ranks 2 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Secure Code Warrior takes 18% of first choices and SecureFlag takes 26%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “secure code training platform”
2
Position for “secure code training platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
1,000 a month (“secure code warrior”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
22 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 2,802 a month
Searches its site ranks for
785 · 42 in the top three
Sites linking to it
2,182
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
26 ads · 17 text, 9 video · 7 shown in the last 30 days

First shown October 2024, as SECURE CODE WARRIOR LIMITED, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 6 in the year, 20 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
18%
rank 2 of 97 in secure code training
Segment leader
26%
SecureFlag
First choices
27 across its categories
Named in
153 answers
Its own site cited
in 149 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on securecodewarrior.com
10,041
subdomains included
Content
1,193
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
36 · 3
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
News or press717undatedSecure code training, AI coding
Blog321102026-10-01IaC, Secure code training
Webinar or virtual event109undated
Case study1102026-01-06
Conference or event8undated
Report or ebook7undated
Podcast or video7undated
Comparison602022-02-08
Glossary or explainer502025-08-27
Template or tool202017-09-27

Events in person

Last twelve months

As the event pages on securecodewarrior.com state them, read October 5, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page securecodewarrior.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Names read as Secure Code Warrior

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Secure Code Warrior; a claim can dispute any of them.
Secure Code Warrior (SCW) 4

Follow Secure Code Warrior

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Secure Code Warrior is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
AI Software Governance platform
For
organizations
Certifications
PCIPCI-DSSrole-based certificationscertification program
Customers named
SageKamer van KoophandelPaysafeEnvestnetJPMorgan ChaseNational Australia BankNetcetera AGWorkday
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting

What Secure Code Warrior's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: securecodewarrior.com, securecodewarrior.com/plans, trust.securecodewarrior.com, securecodewarrior.com/product/learning, securecodewarrior.com/company/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Secure Code Warrior's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Secure Code Warrior, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Secure Code Warrior by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Secure Code Warrior is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Secure Code Warrior, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at securecodewarrior.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.

Badges

Wins only: a badge exists where Secure Code Warrior is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHide

Secure Code Warrior is among the products AI models recommend first in Secure code training this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.

Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Among AI models' top three in Secure code training, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://it-ai-index.com/developer/secure-code-training/"><img src="https://it-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/secure-code-warrior--secure-code-training-wide.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Secure code training, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index" width="320" height="104"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Secure code training standing, where the claim can be checked.

Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Among AI models' top three in Secure code training, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://it-ai-index.com/developer/secure-code-training/"><img src="https://it-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/secure-code-warrior--secure-code-training-square.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Secure code training, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index" width="240" height="240"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Secure code training standing, where the claim can be checked.

Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Among AI models' top three in Secure code training, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://it-ai-index.com/developer/secure-code-training/"><img src="https://it-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/secure-code-warrior--secure-code-training-compact.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Secure code training, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index" width="200" height="56"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Secure code training standing, where the claim can be checked.

Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.