| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Secure code training | Developer platform | 18% | 2 of 97 | 20% | 51 | accepted challenger |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“look for platforms that offer hands-on "break-fix" labs (like SecureFlag or AppSecEngineer) or highly gamified developer-first tournaments (like Secure Code Warrior)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Secure code training · negative prompt · first choice
“Secure Code Warrior: Highly gamified, excellent language/framework coverage, and has rolled out extensive modules for securing AI-assisted coding.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Secure code training · scale prompt · first choice
“Prioritize platforms that scale well for mid-sized enterprises (e.g., Secure Code Warrior, Security Journey, SecureFlag, Veracode Security Labs)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Secure code training · scale prompt · first choice
“Secure Code Warrior’s gamified, trust‑scored approach makes it ideal for organizations wanting strong developer engagement” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Secure code training · comparative prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Secure Code Warrior has the most consistent negative feedback and is the one I'd be most cautious about.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Secure code training · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid Secure Code Warrior unless your budget comfortably exceeds $50k/year” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Secure code training · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“Trustpilot includes recent complaints that the training feels more like testing than teaching. So I wouldn't call it a scam; I'd just recommend piloting it before buying enterprise-wide.” GPT-5.4 mini · Secure code training · negative prompt · soft negative
“the caution points that come up repeatedly are: dated / repetitive challenge content, limited language/framework coverage for some stacks, reporting and LMS integration friction” Muse Glimmer 30B · Secure code training · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 149 of the 153 answers that named Secure Code Warrior and are not a share of its labels.
667 of the 755 domain citations in answers naming Secure Code Warrior came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News or press | 717 | undated | Secure code training, AI coding | ||
| Blog | 321 | 10 | 2026-10-01 | IaC, Secure code training | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 109 | undated | |||
| Case study | 11 | 0 | 2026-01-06 | ||
| Conference or event | 8 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 7 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 7 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 6 | 0 | 2022-02-08 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 5 | 0 | 2025-08-27 | ||
| Template or tool | 2 | 0 | 2017-09-27 |
As the event pages on securecodewarrior.com state them, read October 5, 2026.
Every page securecodewarrior.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Secure Code Warrior's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: securecodewarrior.com, securecodewarrior.com/plans, trust.securecodewarrior.com, securecodewarrior.com/product/learning, securecodewarrior.com/company/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Secure Code Warrior's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Secure Code Warrior, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Secure Code Warrior by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
Secure Code Warrior is among the products AI models recommend first in Secure code training this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.