Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 42 → 21 of 53
6 categories · RankedCoralogix
79Judge labels
10First choices
0Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
6Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Logs for mid-market buyers
Rank 9 of 73 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 11 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Coralogix →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business21 of 56
0%6 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market9 of 73
2%11 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise8 of 66
2%7 labels
under the label threshold
In logs · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Coralogix for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Log management | IT operations and endpoint | 2% | 9 of 73 | 0% | 11 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Observability platforms | IT operations and endpoint | 2% | 13 of 80 | 0% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Grafana at 27% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| AIOps platforms | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 23 of 93 | 0% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by New Relic at 17% | |
| Application performance monitoring | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 31 of 66 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by New Relic at 46% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Infrastructure monitoring | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 29 of 79 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Datadog at 28% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Telemetry pipelines | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 88 of 124 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by OpenTelemetry Collector at 37% |
Movement
Since September 2026, Coralogix held within the floor in all six categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Logs · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 11 → 7 of 66
Enterprise▼−1Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 4% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 7 → 8 of 62
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Observability | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 15 → 13 of 80 |
| Logs | 2% | 2% | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 11 → 9 of 73 |
| AIOps | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 23 of 93, unchanged |
| APM | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 34 → 31 of 66 |
| Infra monitoring | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 32 → 29 of 79 |
| Telemetry pipelines | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 88 of 124, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Coralogix across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Coralogix across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 8 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct15 labelsNone
Paraphrase5 labelsNone
Comparative13 labelsNone
Budget-constrained31 labels10
Scale-constrained10 labelsNone
Negative5 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative79 labels in all, every segment counted; 10 of the 10 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Coralogix, which offers a cost-effective solution with a pricing model based on data ingestion rather than per-host or per-user fees” Llama 4 Maverick · Observability · budget prompt · first choice
“Coralogix is often the best middle ground... choose Coralogix for its simple, predictable per-gigabyte pricing” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Logs · budget prompt · first choice
“Coralogix is a cost-effective alternative, especially if data ownership and predictable pricing are priorities.” Mistral Small · Observability · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“best if your main cost pressure is telemetry volume, since published rates are usage-based and comparatively low” Perplexity Sonar · AIOps · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Coralogix, over the 79 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Coralogix was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Coralogix, over the 79 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Coralogix was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Coralogix. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 72 of the 79 answers that named Coralogix and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
coralogix.comYour site64
openobserve.ai43
motadata.com40
g2.com32
guideflow.com26
learn.g2.com23
middleware.io22
zapier.com20
cribl.io17
newrelic.com16
239 of the 303 domain citations in answers naming Coralogix came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
coralogix.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Coralogix takes 2% of first choices and Datadog Log Management takes 28%.ShowHide
Search and answers
coralogix.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Coralogix takes 2% of first choices and Datadog Log Management takes 28%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “log management platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “log management platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 4,400 a month (“coralogix”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 83 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 10,540 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 4,268 · 118 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 3,299
- Paid Google search
- 1 searches its ads show for, about 3 clicks and $28 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 9 of 73 in logs
Segment leader
28%
Datadog Log Management
- First choices
- 10 across its categories
- Named in
- 79 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 72 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on coralogix.com
2,269
subdomains included
Content
1,004
counted in the table below
Documentation
899
Product · Integration
93 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 591 | undated | APM, CDN | ||
| Report or ebook | 158 | undated | SIEM, APM | ||
| Conference or event | 137 | undated | APM, WAF | ||
| Case study | 48 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 47 | undated | Logs, APM | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 17 | undated | IaC, APM | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 3 | undated | |||
| News or press | 3 | undated |
Events in person
Last twelve months
- September 10, 2026Tech Race Summit 2026Centrum Praskie Koneser, Warsaw, Poland · exhibited
- September 10, 2026 to September 11, 2026Signals Conference Berlin 2026Kulturbrauerei, Berlin, Germany · exhibited
- August 5, 2026QueenB & Coralogix MeetupCoralogix offices, 21 Abba Hillel St., Ramat Gan, Ramat Gan · hosted
As the event pages on coralogix.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page coralogix.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name SIEM (23); 28 name its categories the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Coralogix
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Coralogix is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Coralogix is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Complete observability. Zero compromises.
- For
- agents and engineers
- Price stated
- Pay for your data and nothing more. All features & support included. coralogix.com/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Start Free Trial coralogix.com
- Integrations claimed
- 300 coralogix.com
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type 2FedRAMP Certified Class CISO/IEC 27001ISO/IEC 27701ISO/IEC 27017:2015ISO/IEC 27018:2019ISO/IEC 42001:2023PCI DSS v4.0.1
- Customers named
- NutanixMiroLexisNexisViaAdobeCurveImpervaWSC Sports
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, hosting
What Coralogix's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: coralogix.com, coralogix.com/pricing, trust.coralogix.com, coralogix.com/platform, coralogix.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Coralogix's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Coralogix, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Coralogix by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Coralogix is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Coralogix, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.