Every category where a model named RansomLeak for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Secure code training	Developer platform	6%	5 of 97	0%	7	under 10 labels · led by SecureFlag at 26%
Security awareness training	Security operations	0%	27 of 64	20%	5	under 10 labels · led by KnowBe4 at 45%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for RansomLeak yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated RansomLeak across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	2	0	0	2
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	1	1	2
Grok 4.20	0	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	1	0	1	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	1	1	1	0	3
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	1	0	2
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct4 labels1

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative8 labelsNone

Budget-constrained2 labels2

Scale-constrained4 labelsNone

Negative4 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative22 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“the best secure code training platforms are RansomLeak, Security Journey, and SecureFlag” Mistral Small · Secure code training · direct prompt · first choice

“I would recommend starting with RansomLeak's free tier or SafeStack ($30/user/year)” MiniMax M2.5 · Secure code training · budget prompt · first choice

“Start with RansomLeak (free if under 25 employees)” Kimi K2 · Secure code training · budget prompt · first choice

“RansomLeak wins on exploit-then-fix depth across web, API, Git, cloud, mobile, and frontend.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Secure code training · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“the result is a vendor-authored source, so it is less neutral than G2 or Expert Insights” Perplexity Sonar · Awareness training · direct prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as RansomLeak, over the 22 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and RansomLeak was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Hoxhunt10 of 223Not among the top eight

KnowBe410 of 223Not among the top eight

SoSafe9 of 220Not among the top eight

SecureFlag8 of 223Not among the top eight

Secure Code Warrior8 of 222Not among the top eight

Proofpoint ZenGuide8 of 220Not among the top eight

MetaCompliance6 of 220Not among the top eight

Security Journey6 of 220Not among the top eight

Veracode Security Labs6 of 220Not among the top eight

Avatao5 of 220Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named RansomLeak. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 22 of the 22 answers that named RansomLeak and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

ransomleak.comYour site22

g2.com14

gartner.com10

adaptivesecurity.com9

sourceforge.net9

hoxhunt.com8

learn.g2.com8

easyllama.com7

expertinsights.com7

slashdot.org7

Seventy-nine of the 101 domain citations in answers naming RansomLeak came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

ransomleak.com/blog/best-secure-coding-training-202612

hoxhunt.com/blog/best-security-awareness-training8

learn.g2.com/best-security-awareness-training-software8

ransomleak.com/blog/best-security-awareness-training-20268

easyllama.com/blog/best-security-awareness-training-providers7

gartner.com/reviews/market/secure-code-training-tools7

sourceforge.net/software/secure-code-training7

expertinsights.com/security-awareness-training/the-top-security-awareness-training-platfor6

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

ransomleak.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, RansomLeak takes 6% of first choices and SecureFlag takes 26%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “secure code training platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “secure code training platforms”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 10 a month (“ransomleak”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 0 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 46 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 125 · 0 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 497
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on Google

None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 5 of 97 in secure code training

Segment leader

26%

SecureFlag

First choices: 3 across its categories
Named in: 22 answers
Its own site cited: in 22 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on ransomleak.com

1,678

subdomains included

Content

169

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

20 · 36

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	137	23	2026-09-28	Awareness training, AI coding
Comparison	26	4	2026-09-02
Glossary or explainer	6	0	2026-01-01

Most recent

2026-09-28Ai in recruitment risks blog
2026-09-28Copilot data security blog
2026-09-28Ai in recruitment risks blog
2026-09-28Copilot data security blog
2026-09-10Cybersecurity awareness month 2026 blog
2026-09-10Cybersecurity awareness month activities blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page ransomleak.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow RansomLeak

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

RansomLeak is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: B2B Human Risk Management platform delivering immersive, interactive 3D cybersecurity training to enterprise organizations.
ransomleak.com
For: Enterprise organizations, security teams, and compliance officers
ransomleak.com
Price stated: Freemium ransomleak.com
Starting price: 0 ransomleak.com
Free plan or trial: 200+ free exercises with no sign-up ransomleak.com
Integrations claimed: 50 ransomleak.com · 3 ransomleak.com/partners pages disagree
Certifications: SOC 2ISO 27001HIPAAPCI DSSGDPRNIS2EU AI Act
Hosting: USEUOur cloud, private cloud, or on-prem
Customers named: Cyber HelmetsVantaDrataDatadogGitLabCiscoAutoPhishBaited

What RansomLeak's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: ransomleak.com, ransomleak.com/compliance, ransomleak.com/features, ransomleak.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when RansomLeak's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as RansomLeak, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for RansomLeak by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where RansomLeak is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name RansomLeak, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.