Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 46 → 57 of 62
1 category · RankedMetaCompliance
34Judge labels
0First choices
7Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Awareness training for mid-market buyers
Rank 14 of 64 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 7% of its 15 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of MetaCompliance →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business63 of 70
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market14 of 64
0%15 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise14 of 55
0%15 labels
criticized challenger
In awareness training · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named MetaCompliance for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Security awareness training | Security operations | 0% | 14 of 64 | 7% | 15 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, MetaCompliance held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Awareness training · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 15 → 14 of 62
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 11 → 17 of 50
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Awareness training | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 15 → 14 of 64 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated MetaCompliance across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated MetaCompliance across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct7 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative15 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative9 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative34 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“MetaCompliance supports compliance-focused programs and is frequently listed alongside Arctic Wolf and Proofpoint for mid-market buyers.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Awareness training · direct prompt · alternative
“Choose MetaCompliance or Infosec IQ if your program is heavily driven by compliance” Perplexity Sonar · Awareness training · comparative prompt · alternative
“All‑in‑one platform that ties awareness to DLP/privacy training and reporting.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Awareness training · comparative prompt · alternative
“Scalable analytics, automation | Growing teams needing detailed reporting” Grok 4.20 · Awareness training · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Regular issues with users ending up on suppression lists” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Awareness training · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as MetaCompliance, over the 34 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and MetaCompliance was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as MetaCompliance, over the 34 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and MetaCompliance was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named MetaCompliance. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 34 of the 34 answers that named MetaCompliance and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
hoxhunt.com29
learn.g2.com27
g2.com23
adaptivesecurity.com22
expertinsights.com22
brside.com15
easyllama.com15
ransomleak.com14
riskpublishing.com13
knowbe4.com12
192 of the 192 domain citations in answers naming MetaCompliance came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
metacompliance.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, MetaCompliance takes 0% of first choices and KnowBe4 takes 45%.ShowHide
Search and answers
metacompliance.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, MetaCompliance takes 0% of first choices and KnowBe4 takes 45%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “security awareness training platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “security awareness training platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 260 a month (“metacompliance”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 2 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 2,656 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 2,904 · 28 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 2,839
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 14 of 64 in awareness training
Segment leader
45%
KnowBe4
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 34 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 34 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on metacompliance.com
4,616
subdomains included
Content
500
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 427 | 12 | 2026-09-15 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 25 | 0 | 2025-03-25 | ||
| Case study | 22 | 3 | 2026-09-14 | ||
| Template or tool | 7 | 0 | 2026-01-16 | ||
| Report or ebook | 6 | 0 | 2026-01-16 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 4 | 1 | 2026-09-17 | ||
| Conference or event | 4 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 4 | 0 | 2025-11-19 | ||
| Podcast or video | 1 | 0 | 2020-06-12 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-17Webinar registration confirmation webinar or virtual event
- 2026-09-15Common mistakes in delivering cyber security awareness campaigns blog
- 2026-09-14Dawn meats cyber awareness engagement case study case study
- 2026-09-10Right message right moment why timing matters in security awareness blog
- 2026-09-08September spotlight breach how social engineering opened the door at levi strauss blog
- 2026-09-02Stop spamming your employees how to make security awareness training more targeted blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page metacompliance.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as MetaCompliance
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as MetaCompliance; a claim can dispute any of them.
MetaCompliance Security Awareness Training 2
Follow MetaCompliance
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
MetaCompliance is its own company.ShowHide
The company
MetaCompliance is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Human Risk Management & Security Awareness
- For
- companies and organisations
- Certifications
- B Corp certified
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting, customers
What MetaCompliance's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: metacompliance.com, metacompliance.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when MetaCompliance's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as MetaCompliance, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for MetaCompliance by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where MetaCompliance is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name MetaCompliance, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.