Palo Alto Networks · 1 category · RankedPalo Alto Networks Prisma SASE
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SASE platforms | Network and edge | 0% | 13 of 43 | 36% | 33 | criticized challenger |
Movement
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Leader (top of vision & execution) | Strongest security-first story, deep threat intel, longest-standing SASE vendor” GLM 4.7 FlashX · SASE · comparative prompt · first choice
“Leaders are Palo Alto Networks, Cato Networks, and Netskope ... Strongest security sophistication” DeepSeek V4 Flash · SASE · comparative prompt · first choice
“Palo Alto Networks - Ranked #1 for both vision and execution (second year in a row)” MiniMax M2.5 · SASE · comparative prompt · first choice
“Leader (ranked #1 for vision and execution)” Kimi K2 · SASE · comparative prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“you might want to avoid the enterprise-heavy giants like Cisco and Palo Alto” Qwen 3.7 Flash · SASE · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid: Pure enterprise platforms like Palo Alto Prisma SASE” Kimi K2 · SASE · direct prompt · hard negative
“generally not recommended for mid-sized B2B companies” Gemini 3.5 Flash · SASE · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“notoriously complex to deploy and maintain ... complex "credit-based" subscription model that makes predicting renewal costs highly difficult” Gemini 3.5 Flash · SASE · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 76 of the 98 answers that named Palo Alto Networks Prisma SASE and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
276 of the 276 domain citations in answers naming Palo Alto Networks Prisma SASE came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Names read as Palo Alto Networks Prisma SASE
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Palo Alto Networks Prisma SASE's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Palo Alto Networks Prisma SASE, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at palo.ai is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.