AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Palo Alto Networks Prisma SASE · October 2026 Edition
Palo Alto Networks · 3 categories · Ranked

Palo Alto Networks Prisma SASE

122Judge labels
13First choices
33Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
26% in SASE for enterprise buyers
Rank 11 of 45 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 27% of its 44 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Palo Alto Networks Prisma SASE →
By buyer segmentStrongest at enterprise.
In sase · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Palo Alto Networks Prisma SASE for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
SASE platformsNetwork and edge0%11 of 4527%44criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
SD-WANNetwork and edge0%43 of 730%1under 10 labels · led by Fortinet Secure SD-WAN at 50%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
Zero trust network accessNetwork and edge0%37 of 660%1under 10 labels · led by Twingate at 39%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

Movement

Since September 2026, Palo Alto Networks Prisma SASE held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · SASE · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 49 → 51 of 52
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 13 → 11 of 43
Enterprise▼−5Since September 2026: 31% → 26%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
26%from 31% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 6 pointsRank 1 of 46, unchanged

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
SASE0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 13 → 11 of 45
SD-WAN0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 43 of 73, unchanged
ZTNA0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 37 of 66, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Palo Alto Networks Prisma SASE across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500303
GPT-5.4 mini01102
Gemini 3.5 Flash10146
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.2011226
Mistral Small02103
DeepSeek V4 Flash04026
Llama 4 Maverick00202
Qwen 3.7 Flash02125
Kimi K211114
GLM 4.7 FlashX00101
MiniMax M2.500202
GPT-6 Luna02103
Muse Glimmer 30B01113

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct24 labels7
Paraphrase20 labels5
Comparative28 labels6not counted in share
Budget-constrained13 labelsNone
Scale-constrained13 labels1
Negative24 labels3not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative122 labels in all, every segment counted; 13 of the 22 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Market Leaders with Fewer Concerns: Palo Alto Networks (Prisma SASE), Cloudflare One, Check Point” Kimi K2 · SASE · negative prompt · first choice
“Best-of-breed security and robust networking built for the most demanding enterprise environments.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · SASE · comparative prompt · first choice
“Palo Alto Networks Prisma SASE (Gartner Leader #1 for execution and vision)” Grok 4.20 · SASE · comparative prompt · first choice
“Palo Alto Networks Prisma SASE for hybrid environments where on-premises and cloud security must share a single policy engine” Muse Glimmer 30B · SASE · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Platforms to Scrutinize: Palo Alto Networks (Prisma SASE) and Zscaler (Zero Trust Exchange). ... frequently cited as "overkill" for smaller organizations” Qwen 3.7 Flash · SASE · negative prompt · soft negative
“they are often too complex, too expensive, and require too much dedicated staff to manage and fine-tune for a mid-market organization” Gemini 3.5 Flash · SASE · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“lead on enterprise-scale feature depth, but are typically SSE-first and more complex/expensive to stand up for mid-market” Muse Glimmer 30B · SASE · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“Caution: Typically more expensive and complex; better suited for larger enterprises or highly regulated industries.” Kimi K2 · SASE · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Palo Alto Networks Prisma SASE, over the 122 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Palo Alto Networks Prisma SASE was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange102 of 12210Not among the top eight
Cloudflare One85 of 12222Not among the top eight
Fortinet FortiSASE85 of 1221Not among the top eight
Netskope One76 of 1224Not among the top eight
Cato Networks65 of 12220Not among the top eight
Cisco30 of 1220Not among the top eight
Versa SASE29 of 1220Not among the top eight
Cato SASE Cloud27 of 1227Not among the top eight
Cisco Secure Access23 of 1220Not among the top eight
Check Point Harmony SASE21 of 1221Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Palo Alto Networks Prisma SASE. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 109 of the 122 answers that named Palo Alto Networks Prisma SASE and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

guideflow.com65
fortinet.com39
netify.co.uk31
cloudsek.com30
sase.checkpoint.com30
paloaltonetworks.comYour site28
catonetworks.com27
g2.com27
techrepublic.com27
esecurityplanet.com26

302 of the 330 domain citations in answers naming Palo Alto Networks Prisma SASE came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where Palo Alto Networks Prisma SASE stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Searches for its name, Google
720 a month (“palo alto networks prisma sase”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
1 a month
Its own site
It sits on Palo Alto Networks's site (paloaltonetworks.com), so there are no site figures for it alone

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 11 of 45 in SASE
Segment leader
35%
Cato Networks
First choices
13 across its categories
Named in
122 answers
Its own site cited
in 109 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Names read as Palo Alto Networks Prisma SASE

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Palo Alto Networks Prisma SASE; a claim can dispute any of them.
Palo Alto Networks 9Palo Alto Prisma SASE 9Palo Alto Networks (Prisma SASE) 8Palo Alto 2Palo Alto Networks (Prisma Access) 2Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access / Prisma SASE 2Palo Alto (Prisma SASE) 1Palo Alto Networks (Prisma) 1

Follow Palo Alto Networks Prisma SASE

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Palo Alto Networks is the company behind Palo Alto Networks Prisma SASE.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Prisma Access has integrated Zero Trust Network Access 2.0 capabilities to help provide secure, remote and least-privileged access across users and applications.
For
organizations; branch offices; IT teams
Free plan or trial
Test out Prisma SD-WAN with our virtual Ultimate Test Drive! paloaltonetworks.com/sase/sd-wan
Certifications
SOC2 certified
Customers named
WestfieldVillage RoadshowSalesforceAtlantic Health SystemReliasSA RecyclingDürümleBeam Suntory
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, integrations, hosting

What Palo Alto Networks Prisma SASE's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: paloaltonetworks.com/sase/ztna, paloaltonetworks.com/sase/sd-wan, paloaltonetworks.com/sase/access, paloaltonetworks.com/sase/prisma-agent, paloaltonetworks.com/sase/prisma-browser. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Palo Alto Networks Prisma SASE's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Palo Alto Networks Prisma SASE, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Palo Alto Networks Prisma SASE by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Palo Alto Networks Prisma SASE is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Palo Alto Networks Prisma SASE, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at paloaltonetworks.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.