| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SASE platforms | Network and edge | 0% | 11 of 45 | 27% | 44 | criticized challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| SD-WAN | Network and edge | 0% | 43 of 73 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Fortinet Secure SD-WAN at 50% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Zero trust network access | Network and edge | 0% | 37 of 66 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Twingate at 39% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SASE | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 13 → 11 of 45 |
| SD-WAN | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 43 of 73, unchanged |
| ZTNA | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 37 of 66, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 6 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 6 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 6 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Market Leaders with Fewer Concerns: Palo Alto Networks (Prisma SASE), Cloudflare One, Check Point” Kimi K2 · SASE · negative prompt · first choice
“Best-of-breed security and robust networking built for the most demanding enterprise environments.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · SASE · comparative prompt · first choice
“Palo Alto Networks Prisma SASE (Gartner Leader #1 for execution and vision)” Grok 4.20 · SASE · comparative prompt · first choice
“Palo Alto Networks Prisma SASE for hybrid environments where on-premises and cloud security must share a single policy engine” Muse Glimmer 30B · SASE · comparative prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Platforms to Scrutinize: Palo Alto Networks (Prisma SASE) and Zscaler (Zero Trust Exchange). ... frequently cited as "overkill" for smaller organizations” Qwen 3.7 Flash · SASE · negative prompt · soft negative
“they are often too complex, too expensive, and require too much dedicated staff to manage and fine-tune for a mid-market organization” Gemini 3.5 Flash · SASE · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“lead on enterprise-scale feature depth, but are typically SSE-first and more complex/expensive to stand up for mid-market” Muse Glimmer 30B · SASE · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“Caution: Typically more expensive and complex; better suited for larger enterprises or highly regulated industries.” Kimi K2 · SASE · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 109 of the 122 answers that named Palo Alto Networks Prisma SASE and are not a share of its labels.
302 of the 330 domain citations in answers naming Palo Alto Networks Prisma SASE came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Palo Alto Networks Prisma SASE's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: paloaltonetworks.com/sase/ztna, paloaltonetworks.com/sase/sd-wan, paloaltonetworks.com/sase/access, paloaltonetworks.com/sase/prisma-agent, paloaltonetworks.com/sase/prisma-browser. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Palo Alto Networks Prisma SASE's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Palo Alto Networks Prisma SASE, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Palo Alto Networks Prisma SASE by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: