| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SASE platforms | Network and edge | 6% | 4 of 45 | 10% | 58 | accepted challenger | ▲+7Since September 2026: 0% → 7%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Zero trust network access | Network and edge | 0% | 55 of 66 | 33% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Twingate at 39% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SASE | 0% | 7% | ▲+7Since September 2026: 0% → 7%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 10 → 4 of 45 |
| ZTNA | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 55 of 66, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 6 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 8 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“For most mid-market B2B companies, Fortinet FortiSASE offers the best balance of price, features, and reliability.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · SASE · direct prompt · first choice
“The Best All-Rounder: Fortinet (FortiGate)... Fortinet offers the highest "bang for your buck."” Qwen 3.7 Flash · SASE · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Top Recommendation: FortiSASE” GLM 4.7 FlashX · SASE · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Fortinet offers a highly cost-effective path to SASE. It is a very strong, budget-friendly option if you have a hardware-heavy network.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · SASE · scale prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Critical Compliance Failures: Fails FedRAMP authorization, HIPAA-BAA, and PCI-DSS” GLM 4.7 FlashX · SASE · negative prompt · hard negative
“Good if you are already heavily invested in Fortinet hardware at your branches, though it can sometimes be more complex to implement.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · SASE · direct prompt · soft negative
“The platform struggles with integration challenges, particularly integrating with legacy applications” Claude Haiku 4.5 · SASE · negative prompt · soft negative
“While affordable, it has limited compliance certifications (20% score across key compliance checks)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · SASE · budget prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 148 of the 163 answers that named Fortinet FortiSASE and are not a share of its labels.
392 of the 452 domain citations in answers naming Fortinet FortiSASE came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Fortinet FortiSASE's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: community.fortinet.com/fortisase-58, fortinet.com/products/sase, videocms.corp.fortinet.com/products/fortisase, fortinet.com/products/fortisase-sovereign, videocms.corp.fortinet.com/watch/fortisase-remote-browser-isolation. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Fortinet FortiSASE's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Fortinet FortiSASE, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Fortinet FortiSASE by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: