| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Next-generation firewalls | Network and edge | 0% | 16 of 83 | 8% | 12 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Firewalls | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 13 → 16 of 83 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“For most enterprises the shortlist starts with Fortinet FortiGate (best price-performance) and Palo Alto Networks (deepest application control).” Muse Glimmer 30B · Firewalls · comparative prompt · first choice
“Do you require granular application control and a mature SASE story? → Palo Alto Networks is often the go‑to.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Firewalls · comparative prompt · first choice
“Palo Alto Networks PA-Series for the deepest AI-driven threat prevention” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Firewalls · comparative prompt · first choice
“if your company has a mature security operations center (SOC) and budget for premium solutions, Palo Alto Networks would be the better choice” MiniMax M2.5 · Firewalls · paraphrase prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Drawbacks: More expensive for pure mid-market budgets.” Grok 4.20 · Firewalls · direct prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 24 of the 25 answers that named Palo Alto Networks PA-Series and are not a share of its labels.
109 of the 119 domain citations in answers naming Palo Alto Networks PA-Series came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Palo Alto Networks PA-Series's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: paloaltonetworks.com/services/education/palo-alto-networks-ngfw-engineer, paloaltonetworks.com/resources/videos/palo-alto-networks-ml-powered-next-generation-firewall, paloaltonetworks.com/resources/videos/your-security-starts-with-palo-alto-networks-next-generation-firewalls, live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/palo-alto-networks-next-generation-firewalls-threat-prevention/td-p/534873, live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/next-generation-firewall/palo-alto-networks-pa-450-next-generation-firewall-to-maintain/td-p/1245019. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Palo Alto Networks PA-Series's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Palo Alto Networks PA-Series, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Palo Alto Networks PA-Series by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: