Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 50 of 87, unchanged
1 category · Named, not rankedJuniper SRX Series
17Judge labels
0First choices
1Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
9 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Juniper SRX Series was named 9 times in Firewalls, where Fortinet FortiGate led with 73%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business59 of 99
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Mid-market18 of 83
0%9 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise15 of 88
0%7 labels
under the label threshold
In firewalls · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Juniper SRX Series for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Next-generation firewalls | Network and edge | 0% | 18 of 83 | 0% | 9 | under 10 labels · led by Fortinet FortiGate at 73% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Juniper SRX Series held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Firewalls · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 14 → 15 of 73
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 9 → 12 of 70
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Firewalls | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 14 → 18 of 83 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Juniper SRX Series across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Juniper SRX Series across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase3 labelsNone
Comparative8 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative17 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“the natural fit for Juniper‑centric networks needing converged routing, switching, and security” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Firewalls · comparative prompt · alternative
“Best Overall ... Enterprises needing stateful perimeter control + IPsec VPN” MiniMax M2.5 · Firewalls · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Juniper when routing and firewalling are closely coupled” GPT-6 Luna · Firewalls · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Juniper SRX Series, over the 17 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Juniper SRX Series was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Juniper SRX Series, over the 17 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Juniper SRX Series was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Juniper SRX Series. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 14 of the 17 answers that named Juniper SRX Series and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
checkpoint.com9
fortinet.com9
comparitech.com8
cisco.com7
cybersecuritynews.com7
cyberpress.org6
paloaltonetworks.com6
gbhackers.com5
learn.g2.com5
decryptiondigest.com4
Sixty-six of the sixty-six domain citations in answers naming Juniper SRX Series came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
juniper.net is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Juniper SRX Series takes 0% of first choices and Fortinet FortiGate takes 73%.ShowHide
Search and answers
juniper.net is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Juniper SRX Series takes 0% of first choices and Fortinet FortiGate takes 73%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “next-generation firewall”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “next-generation firewalls”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 30 a month (“juniper srx series”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 267,308 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 19,643 · 2,261 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 21,426
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 18 of 83 in firewalls
Segment leader
73%
Fortinet FortiGate
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 17 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 14 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on juniper.net
18,270
subdomains included
Content
1,468
counted in the table below
Documentation
8,923
Product · Integration
952 · 41
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case study | 831 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 315 | undated | SASE | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 94 | 0 | 2022-09-01 | ||
| Comparison | 90 | 0 | 2025-04-01 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 84 | 0 | 2020-12-01 | ||
| Conference or event | 36 | 0 | 2020-12-01 | ||
| News or press | 8 | undated | |||
| Blog | 4 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 3 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 3 | undated |
Most recent
- 2025-04-01Com android ipsec ikev2 vs srx comparison
- 2022-09-01Inter domain on demand sr te lsps with bgp ls webinar or virtual event
- 2022-07-01Networking chips vs gpuscpus comparison
- 2020-12-01What is a trusted platform module tpm glossary or explainer
- 2020-12-01Exercising alternatives to detect and prevent brute force attacks comparison
- 2020-12-01Juniper sky advanced threat prevention vs locky malware comparison
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page juniper.net exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Juniper SRX Series
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Juniper SRX Series; a claim can dispute any of them.
Juniper SRX 4Juniper 3Juniper (SRX Series) 1
Follow Juniper SRX Series
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Juniper SRX Series's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Juniper SRX Series, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Juniper SRX Series by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Juniper SRX Series is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Juniper SRX Series, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.