AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › pfSense · October 2026 Edition
3 categories · Named, not ranked

pfSense

29Judge labels
3First choices
6Negative labels
8 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
8 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. pfSense was named 8 times in NAC and 2 other categories, where Portnox Cloud led with 35%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In nac · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named pfSense for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Network access controlNetwork and edge2%8 of 1110%3under 10 labels · led by Portnox Cloud at 35%
Next-generation firewallsNetwork and edge0%63 of 8350%4under 10 labels · led by Fortinet FortiGate at 73%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
DDI and IP address managementNetwork and edge0%94 of 1150%1under 10 labels · led by BlueCat Micetro at 15%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for pfSense yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated pfSense across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.510102
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash01001
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.2001001
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00101
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00011
MiniMax M2.500011
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B01001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained19 labels3
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative5 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative29 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Pfsense and OPNsense are excellent free firewall options that provide robust access control capabilities without licensing costs.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · NAC · budget prompt · first choice
“Use firewall/Wi-Fi features (e.g., pfSense free firewall with VLANs/802.1X...)—simplest for very small setups, though less full-featured NAC.” Grok 4.20 · NAC · budget prompt · alternative
“If budget is extremely constrained and you can self-manage: pfSense Community Edition on commodity hardware / Netgate appliance” Muse Glimmer 30B · Firewalls · budget prompt · alternative
“You download pfSense or OPNsense (both are free) and install them on an inexpensive multi-port Intel Mini-PC” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Firewalls · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“they usually lack the built‑in advanced threat‑intel, seamless updates, and support that commercial NGFWs provide” MiniMax M2.5 · Firewalls · budget prompt · soft negative
“can be free but require hardware investment and technical expertise” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Firewalls · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as pfSense, over the 28 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and pfSense was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
OPNsense12 of 280Not among the top eight
Fortinet FortiGate10 of 286Not among the top eight
Sophos Firewall7 of 281Not among the top eight
Ubiquiti UniFi7 of 280Not among the top eight
SonicWall6 of 280Not among the top eight
Cisco Secure Firewall4 of 280Not among the top eight
WatchGuard Firebox4 of 280Not among the top eight
PacketFence3 of 282Not among the top eight
Portnox Cloud3 of 282Not among the top eight
SolarWinds IP Address Manager3 of 282Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named pfSense. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 24 of the 28 answers that named pfSense and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com10
enterprisenetworkingplanet.com9
sourceforge.net9
cyberpress.org8
comparitech.com7
esecurityplanet.com7
reddit.com7
sangfor.com7
us.fitgap.com7
fortinet.com6

Seventy-seven of the seventy-seven domain citations in answers naming pfSense came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

pfsense.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, pfSense takes 2% of first choices and Portnox Cloud takes 35%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “network access control solution”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “network access control solutions”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
14,800 a month (“pfsense”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
2,048 a month
Organic visits to its site
about a month
Searches its site ranks for
· in the top three
Sites linking to it
1,057
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
2%
rank 8 of 111 in NAC
Segment leader
35%
Portnox Cloud
First choices
3 across its categories
Named in
28 answers
Its own site cited
in 24 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on pfsense.com
8
subdomains included
Content
6
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Conference or event6undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page pfsense.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as pfSense

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as pfSense; a claim can dispute any of them.
PfSense 1Pfsense 1pfSense / Netgate pfSense Appliance 1pfSense Plus 1

Follow pfSense

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

pfSense is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
World's Most Trusted Open Source Firewall
For
thousands of enterprises
Price stated
starting at $0.08/hr pfsense.com
Starting price
0.08 pfsense.com
Not stated on the pages read
Free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers

What pfSense's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: pfsense.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when pfSense's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as pfSense, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for pfSense by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where pfSense is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name pfSense, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at pfsense.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.