IT AI Index
Index › Vendors › LogRhythm Axon · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

LogRhythm Axon

4Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
3 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. LogRhythm Axon was named 1 time in SIEM, where Microsoft Sentinel led with 41%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market26 of 49
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In siem · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named LogRhythm Axon for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
SIEM platformsSecurity operations0%26 of 490%1under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Sentinel at 41%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for LogRhythm Axon yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated LogRhythm Axon across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K201001
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative4 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“LogRhythm Axon | Compliance-heavy industries” Kimi K2 · SIEM · scale prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as LogRhythm Axon, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and LogRhythm Axon was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Tines3 of 42Not in the top three
Microsoft Sentinel3 of 41Not in the top three
Rapid7 InsightConnect3 of 41Not in the top three
Cortex XSOAR2 of 40Not in the top three
FortiSOAR2 of 40Not in the top three
Splunk SOAR2 of 40Not in the top three
Rapid7 InsightIDR1 of 41Not in the top three
Elastic Security1 of 40Not in the top three
Google Security Operations SOAR1 of 40Not in the top three
IBM QRadar SOAR1 of 40Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named LogRhythm Axon. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 4 answers that named LogRhythm Axon and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

aimultiple.com3
holidaylandmark.com3
myhospitalnow.com3
paloaltonetworks.com3
cipherssecurity.com2
swimlane.com2
atticusrowan.com1
blumira.com1
ciopages.com1
comparitech.com1

Twenty of the twenty domain citations in answers naming LogRhythm Axon came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

aimultiple.com/top-soar-platforms3
holidaylandmark.com/blog/top-10-security-orchestration-automation-response-soar-tools-feat3
myhospitalnow.com/blog/top-10-security-orchestration-automation-response-soar-tools-featur3
paloaltonetworks.com/cyberpedia/soar-tools-comparison2
swimlane.com/blog/avoid-soar-solution-pitfalls2
atticusrowan.com/blog/siem-mid-market1
blumira.com/siem-cost1
ciopages.com/buyer-guides/siem-security-analytics1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when LogRhythm Axon's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as LogRhythm Axon, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at logrhythm.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack