Index › Products › Kondukto · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Kondukto

13Judge labels

0First choices

3Negative labels

7 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Kondukto was named 3 times in ASPM, where Aikido Security led with 37%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business43 of 68

under the label threshold

Mid-market59 of 70

under the label threshold

Enterprise23 of 69

under the label threshold

In aspm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Kondukto for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Application security posture management	Developer platform	0%	59 of 70	33%	3	under 10 labels · led by Aikido Security at 37%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Kondukto yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Kondukto across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct4 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative6 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative3 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative13 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“ArmorCode and Kondukto are described as scanner-agnostic correlation, deduplication and SLA workflow.” Muse Glimmer 30B · ASPM · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Kondukto, over the 13 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Kondukto was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Apiiro12 of 135Not among the top eight

ArmorCode12 of 131Not among the top eight

Cycode ASPM10 of 130Not among the top eight

Checkmarx One8 of 133Not among the top eight

Jit7 of 130Not among the top eight

OX Security7 of 130Not among the top eight

Legit Security6 of 130Not among the top eight

Snyk AppRisk5 of 130Not among the top eight

Aikido Security4 of 132Not among the top eight

Veracode Risk Manager4 of 131Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Kondukto. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 13 of the 13 answers that named Kondukto and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

checkmarx.com10

gartner.com10

startupstash.com9

web.staging.plexicus.ai8

cyberpress.org7

cycode.com7

expertinsights.com7

appsecnews.com6

guideflow.com6

jit.io6

No domain is on file for Kondukto, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

gartner.com/reviews/market/application-security-posture-management-aspm-tools10

startupstash.com/top-tools-application-security-posture-management9

checkmarx.com/learn/aspm/best-aspm-solutions-top-5-options-in-20268

web.staging.plexicus.ai/blog/review/10-best-aspm-tools-unify-application-security-code-to-8

cyberpress.org/aspm-platforms-by-use-case7

appsecnews.com/articles/best-aspm-tools6

checkmarx.com/learn/aspm/best-aspm-tools-5-platforms-to-watch-in-20266

checkmarx.com/product/aspm6

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where Kondukto stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Searches for its name, Google: 50 a month (“kondukto”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 0 a month
Its own site: No site of its own on file, so no site figures

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 59 of 70 in ASPM

Segment leader

37%

Aikido Security

First choices: 0 across its categories
Named in: 13 answers
Its own site cited: No site on file to match

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Follow Kondukto

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Kondukto's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Kondukto, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Kondukto by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Kondukto is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Kondukto, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.