Every category where a model named Mimecast Engage for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Security awareness training	Security operations	0%	18 of 65	11%	9	under 10 labels · led by KnowBe4 at 42%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Mimecast Engage yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Mimecast Engage across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	1	2
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	2	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	2	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase3 labelsNone

Comparative11 labelsNone

Budget-constrained2 labelsNone

Scale-constrained4 labelsNone

Negative4 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative26 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“best for companies already buying Mimecast email security” Perplexity Sonar · Awareness training · comparative prompt · alternative

“Best for high-engagement video: Mimecast” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Awareness training · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid Platforms with "Campaign-Only" & "Tick-the-Box" Approaches * Examples of this model: Older integrations from legacy secure email gateways (like Mimecast or Proofpoint/Wombat).” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Awareness training · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Mimecast Engage, over the 26 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Mimecast Engage was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

KnowBe425 of 2615Not in the top three

Proofpoint ZenGuide23 of 260Not in the top three

Hoxhunt15 of 264Not in the top three

Huntress Managed Security Awareness Training9 of 260Not in the top three

Infosec IQ8 of 260Not in the top three

SANS Security Awareness7 of 260Not in the top three

SoSafe7 of 260Not in the top three

Cofense6 of 260Not in the top three

Hook Security5 of 263Not in the top three

Wizer5 of 262Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Mimecast Engage. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 17 of the 26 answers that named Mimecast Engage and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

hoxhunt.com11

adaptivesecurity.com10

knowbe4.com10

brside.com8

expertinsights.com8

learn.g2.com8

g2.com7

easyllama.com6

gartner.com6

usecure.io6

Eighty of the eighty domain citations in answers naming Mimecast Engage came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

hoxhunt.com/blog/best-security-awareness-training9

knowbe4.com/compare/leading-security-awareness-training9

learn.g2.com/best-security-awareness-training-software8

easyllama.com/blog/best-security-awareness-training-providers6

gartner.com/reviews/market/security-awareness-computer-based-training6

adaptivesecurity.com/blog/security-awareness-training-platforms5

doozy.live/blog/best-security-awareness-training-platforms5

expertinsights.com/security-awareness-training/the-top-security-awareness-training-platfor5

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Mimecast Engage

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Mimecast Engage; a claim can dispute any of them.

Mimecast 6Mimecast Awareness Training 1Mimecast Security Awareness 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Mimecast Engage's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Mimecast Engage, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at mimecast.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.