Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 40 → 53 of 62
Mimecast · 1 category · RankedMimecast Engage
32Judge labels
0First choices
6Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Awareness training for mid-market buyers
Rank 17 of 64 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 17% of its 12 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Mimecast Engage →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business58 of 70
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market17 of 64
0%12 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise11 of 55
0%17 labels
accepted challenger
In awareness training · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Mimecast Engage for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Security awareness training | Security operations | 0% | 17 of 64 | 17% | 12 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Mimecast Engage held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Awareness training · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 19 → 17 of 62
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 12 → 10 of 50
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Awareness training | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 19 → 17 of 64 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Mimecast Engage across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Mimecast Engage across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct6 labelsNone
Paraphrase7 labelsNone
Comparative8 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained4 labelsNone
Negative5 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative32 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Offers strong phishing simulations and reporting, ideal for companies looking for a reliable, enterprise-grade solution” Mistral Small · Awareness training · direct prompt · alternative
“Seamless integration with Mimecast’s email continuity and security offerings.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Awareness training · comparative prompt · alternative
“Strengths: Highly engaging content, strong integration with email security” MiniMax M2.5 · Awareness training · comparative prompt · alternative
“Mimecast if you already rely heavily on Mimecast email security” GPT-5.4 mini · Awareness training · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Proofpoint, Mimecast – Often bundled with email security and can be expensive for small teams” Kimi K2 · Awareness training · budget prompt · hard negative
“Repeatedly flagged in vendor reviews for generic content and integration constraints.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Awareness training · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Mimecast Engage, over the 32 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Mimecast Engage was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Mimecast Engage, over the 32 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Mimecast Engage was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Mimecast Engage. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 29 of the 32 answers that named Mimecast Engage and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
knowbe4.com15
hoxhunt.com14
adaptivesecurity.com13
expertinsights.com12
g2.com12
learn.g2.com12
defendify.com9
riskpublishing.com9
gartner.com8
proofpoint.com7
111 of the 111 domain citations in answers naming Mimecast Engage came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
mimecast.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Mimecast Engage takes 0% of first choices and KnowBe4 takes 45%.ShowHide
Search and answers
mimecast.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Mimecast Engage takes 0% of first choices and KnowBe4 takes 45%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “security awareness training platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “security awareness training platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 90 a month (“mimecast engage”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Its company's site
- mimecast.com shared with Mimecast's other products; the figures are the site's
- Organic visits to its site
- about 148,929 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 12,907 · 1,030 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 56,562
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 17 of 64 in awareness training
Segment leader
45%
KnowBe4
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 32 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 29 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as Mimecast Engage
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Mimecast Engage; a claim can dispute any of them.
Mimecast 4Mimecast Awareness Training 4Mimecast awareness training 1Mimecast/Infosec IQ 1
Follow Mimecast Engage
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Mimecast is the company behind Mimecast Engage.ShowHide
The company
Mimecast is the company behind Mimecast Engage.
ShowHideOn record
Company records- Also from Mimecast
- Mimecast Archiving, Mimecast Cloud Archive, Mimecast Email Security, Mimecast Incydr
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Change employee behavior with Mimecast's phish testing solution. Customizable and easily integrated into our Awareness Training Platform.
- For
- organizations
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers
What Mimecast Engage's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: mimecast.com/content/phish-testing, mimecast.com/content/phishing-training, mimecast.com/content/phishing-awareness, mimecast.com/content/gdpr-awareness-training, mimecast.com/content/email-security-awareness. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Mimecast Engage's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Mimecast Engage, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Mimecast Engage by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Mimecast Engage is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Mimecast Engage, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.