IT AI Index
Index Vendors › Arctic Wolf Managed Security Awareness · September 2026 Edition
Arctic Wolf · 1 category · Ranked

Arctic Wolf Managed Security Awareness

30Judge labels
1First choices
6Negative labels
11 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Awareness training for mid-market buyers
Rank 7 of 65 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
1 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 13 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In awareness training · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Arctic Wolf Managed Security Awareness for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Security awareness trainingSecurity operations2%7 of 650%13accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Arctic Wolf Managed Security Awareness yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Arctic Wolf Managed Security Awareness across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash01001
Perplexity Sonar00101
Grok 4.1 Fast01102
Mistral Small00101
DeepSeek V4 Flash01001
Llama 4 Maverick01001
Qwen 3.7 Flash00101
Kimi K201102
GLM 4.7 FlashX01001
MiniMax M2.511002

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct6 labels1
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative14 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative6 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative30 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Go with KnowBe4 or Arctic Wolf” MiniMax M2.5 · Awareness training · direct prompt · first choice
“Huntress SAT or Arctic Wolf | Lean teams wanting a fully managed service ... Cons: Less granular customization.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Awareness training · scale prompt · alternative
“Choose Arctic Wolf if you want a fully managed program and minimal internal administration” Kimi K2 · Awareness training · comparative prompt · alternative
“Best if you want a fully managed service: Arctic Wolf Managed Security Awareness” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Awareness training · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Arctic Wolf Managed Security Awareness, over the 30 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Arctic Wolf Managed Security Awareness was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
KnowBe429 of 3013Not in the top three
Hoxhunt25 of 307Not in the top three
Proofpoint ZenGuide24 of 300Not in the top three
SoSafe18 of 302Not in the top three
MetaCompliance14 of 300Not in the top three
Infosec IQ11 of 302Not in the top three
Adaptive Security8 of 301Not in the top three
Cofense PhishMe6 of 300Not in the top three
NINJIO6 of 300Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Arctic Wolf Managed Security Awareness. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 28 of the 30 answers that named Arctic Wolf Managed Security Awareness and are not a share of its labels.

Names read as Arctic Wolf Managed Security Awareness

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Arctic Wolf Managed Security Awareness; a claim can dispute any of them.
Arctic Wolf 9Arctic Wolf Managed SAT 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Arctic Wolf Managed Security Awareness's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Arctic Wolf Managed Security Awareness, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at arcticwolf.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack