| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Security awareness training | Security operations | 0% | 13 of 64 | 18% | 22 | accepted challenger | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Awareness training | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 7 → 13 of 64 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“If you want a completely hands-off approach, Arctic Wolf is excellent for mid-market organizations specifically.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Awareness training · direct prompt · alternative
“Arctic Wolf: Tops mid-market usage per G2; ideal if you want training tied to managed detection/response.” Grok 4.20 · Awareness training · direct prompt · alternative
“if you're under-resourced, Arctic Wolf's managed model might be worth the investment” MiniMax M2.5 · Awareness training · direct prompt · alternative
“Arctic Wolf leads with 77% mid-market adoption and offers inbox-based training.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Awareness training · direct prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Arctic Wolf has received positive reviews, but its focus on microlearning and simulations may not be suitable for all organizations.” Llama 4 Maverick · Awareness training · negative prompt · soft negative
“"Arctic Wolf lacks measurement of test results and relies on manual setup."” Muse Glimmer 30B · Awareness training · negative prompt · soft negative
“Relies on manual setup; lacks automated test-result measurement.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Awareness training · negative prompt · soft negative
“Lacks measurement – doesn't adequately measure test results” Kimi K2 · Awareness training · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 39 of the 39 answers that named Arctic Wolf Managed Security Awareness and are not a share of its labels.
210 of the 210 domain citations in answers naming Arctic Wolf Managed Security Awareness came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Arctic Wolf Managed Security Awareness's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: arcticwolf.com/de/solutions/managed-security-awareness, arcticwolf.com/resources/tag/managed-security-awareness, docs.arcticwolf.com/en/managed-security-awareness-ma/faq, arcticwolf.com/resources/tag/managed-security-awareness-uk, arcticwolf.com/resources/tag/managed-security-awareness-de. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Arctic Wolf Managed Security Awareness's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Arctic Wolf Managed Security Awareness, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Arctic Wolf Managed Security Awareness by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: