Every category where a model named Iden for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Identity governance	Identity and access	8%	3 of 77	0%	13	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Iden yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Iden across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	1	0	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	2	0	3
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	1	1	1	3
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	1	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	1	1	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct5 labels4

Paraphrase4 labels3

Comparative6 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained13 labels3

Scale-constrained4 labels2

Negative3 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative35 labels in all, every segment counted; 12 of the 14 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“modern, SaaS-first options like Lumos, Zluri, Linx, Opal Security, and Iden (AI-native, universal connectors” DeepSeek V4 Flash · IGA · scale prompt · first choice

“Corma or Iden. ... or Iden if you want a similar mid-market fit with very fast time-to-value” Perplexity Sonar · IGA · direct prompt · first choice

“I'd suggest evaluating Lumos or Iden first, as they're purpose-built for your segment” Kimi K2 · IGA · direct prompt · first choice

“Iden or Lumos are the best starting points” GLM 4.7 FlashX · IGA · paraphrase prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Iden, over the 35 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Iden was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

SailPoint23 of 353Not in the top three

Saviynt Enterprise Identity Cloud23 of 350Not in the top three

Okta Identity Governance20 of 350Not in the top three

Microsoft Entra ID Governance17 of 356Compare →

AccessOwl16 of 353Not in the top three

Lumos13 of 351Compare →

One Identity Manager12 of 350Not in the top three

JumpCloud9 of 351Not in the top three

Zluri8 of 351Not in the top three

tenfold7 of 352Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Iden. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 35 of the 35 answers that named Iden and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

idenhq.comYour site35

accessowl.com20

gartner.com20

corma.io19

expertinsights.com19

aimultiple.com18

solutionsreview.com17

startwithidentity.com17

zluri.com15

lumos.com14

159 of the 194 domain citations in answers naming Iden came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

idenhq.com/en/blog/12-best-iga-vendors-in-2026-complete-comparison25

accessowl.com/blog/buyers-guide-for-iga-tools-by-team-size20

gartner.com/reviews/market/identity-governance-administration20

aimultiple.com/iga-solutions18

idenhq.com/en/blog/identity-governance-and-administration-complete17

solutionsreview.com/identity-management/the-best-identity-governance-tools-and-vendors-215

expertinsights.com/identity-and-access-management/top-identity-governance-and-administrati14

corma.io/blog/best-iga-solutions-for-mid-market-companies13

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Iden's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Iden, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at idenhq.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.