AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › CTM360 · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Named, not ranked

CTM360

26Judge labels
1First choices
5Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
8 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. CTM360 was named 8 times in DRP and 1 other category, where UpGuard BreachSight led with 22%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In drp · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named CTM360 for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Digital risk protectionSecurity operations0%29 of 8629%7under 10 labels · led by UpGuard BreachSight at 22%
Application security posture managementDeveloper platform0%63 of 70100%1under 10 labels · led by Aikido Security at 37%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for CTM360 yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated CTM360 across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini01001
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.2001001
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash02013
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00011
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00101
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00011

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct5 labelsNone
Paraphrase3 labels1
Comparative9 labelsNone
Budget-constrained3 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative6 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative26 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“CTM360 / free-tier DRP options if you want to minimize spend as much as possible.” GPT-5.4 mini · DRP · budget prompt · alternative
“Offers a managed services model baked into its platform” DeepSeek V4 Flash · DRP · comparative prompt · alternative
“The Cheapest "Entry-Level" Alternative: CTM360” DeepSeek V4 Flash · DRP · budget prompt · alternative
“CTM360 (G2 Leader)” Grok 4.20 · DRP · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“this platform has faced user frustration regarding limited functionality ... and integration hurdles” Qwen 3.7 Flash · DRP · negative prompt · soft negative
“Some Gartner reviewers report false positives and incorrect severity rating for CTM360.” Muse Glimmer 30B · ASPM · negative prompt · soft negative
“CTM360 (Caution for limited functionality) ... User reviews point to missing features.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · DRP · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as CTM360, over the 26 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and CTM360 was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
ZeroFox16 of 266Not among the top eight
Recorded Future16 of 262Not among the top eight
SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence8 of 260Not among the top eight
Group-IB Digital Risk Protection7 of 262Not among the top eight
Netcraft7 of 260Not among the top eight
UpGuard BreachSight6 of 261Not among the top eight
Bitsight5 of 260Not among the top eight
Cortex Xpanse4 of 262Not among the top eight
Red Points4 of 260Not among the top eight
Intruder3 of 263Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named CTM360. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 26 of the 26 answers that named CTM360 and are not a share of its labels.

Search and answers

ctm360.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, CTM360 takes 0% of first choices and UpGuard BreachSight takes 22%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “digital risk protection platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “digital risk protection platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
70 a month (“ctm360”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
2 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 406 a month
Searches its site ranks for
224 · 17 in the top three
Sites linking to it
1,022
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 29 of 86 in DRP
Segment leader
22%
UpGuard BreachSight
First choices
1 across its categories
Named in
26 answers
Its own site cited
in 26 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on ctm360.com
180
subdomains included
Content
113
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
39 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
News or press4632026-09-22
Blog3022026-09-21ASM
Report or ebook2932026-09-22
Conference or event612026-09-16
Glossary or explainer212026-08-11
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page ctm360.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow CTM360

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

CTM360 is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Consolidated External Cybersecurity & Digital Risk Protection Platform
For
security teams worldwide
Price stated
Simplified All-in-One Pricing ctm360.com/pricing
Starting price
0 ctm360.com/pricing
Free plan or trial
Get Free Access ctm360.com
Not stated on the pages read
Integrations, certifications, hosting, customers

What CTM360's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: ctm360.com, ctm360.com/pricing, ctm360.com/solutions/deepscan. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when CTM360's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as CTM360, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for CTM360 by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where CTM360 is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name CTM360, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at ctm360.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.