IT AI Index
Index Vendors › Google Cloud · September 2026 Edition
6 categories · Ranked

Google Cloud

162Judge labels
1First choices
25Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
6Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Cloud hosting for enterprise buyers
Rank 12 of 78 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 11% of its 46 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In cloud hosting · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Google Cloud for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Cloud hostingCloud and infrastructure0%12 of 7811%46accepted challenger
Backup and disaster recoveryCloud and infrastructure0%111 of 12150%2under 10 labels · led by Veeam at 18%
Managed relational databasesData platform0%40 of 730%1under 10 labels · led by Amazon RDS at 32%
ML platformsData platform0%64 of 990%1under 10 labels · led by Azure Machine Learning at 17%
Multi-factor authenticationIdentity and access0%55 of 780%1under 10 labels · led by Cisco Duo at 42%
Unified endpoint managementIT operations and endpoint0%30 of 520%1under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Intune at 43%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Google Cloud yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Google Cloud across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501405
GPT-5.4 mini03216
Gemini 3.5 Flash03036
Perplexity Sonar03003
Grok 4.1 Fast03115
Mistral Small01203
DeepSeek V4 Flash05005
Llama 4 Maverick00101
Qwen 3.7 Flash01214
Kimi K204004
GLM 4.7 FlashX14106
MiniMax M2.513004

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct30 labels1
Paraphrase32 labelsNone
Comparative33 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained30 labelsNone
Scale-constrained13 labelsNone
Negative24 labels5not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative162 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 7 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“The major cloud providers (AWS, Azure, Google Cloud) generally have better security infrastructure and support” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Cloud hosting · negative prompt · first choice
“Google Cloud = "the data-analytics & AI powerhouse" – excels in big-data workloads, machine learning” MiniMax M2.5 · Cloud hosting · comparative prompt · first choice
“For experimentation and initial development: Google Cloud Platform (GCP) or Amazon Web Services (AWS) free tiers.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Cloud hosting · budget prompt · alternative
“Need app hosting with minimal budget? → Google Cloud Platform (cheapest compute + automatic discounts)” Kimi K2 · Cloud hosting · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“avoid standard AWS S3, Microsoft Azure, or Google Cloud for backup storage” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Backup and DR · budget prompt · hard negative
“A major trap for budget-conscious companies is choosing "hyperscalers" like AWS, Google Cloud, or Microsoft Azure” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Cloud hosting · budget prompt · soft negative
“powerful, but usually more expensive and more complex for small-budget teams unless you carefully optimize” GPT-5.4 mini · Cloud hosting · budget prompt · soft negative
“GCP can sometimes feel less "enterprise-ready" regarding administrative tooling compared to Azure.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Cloud hosting · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Google Cloud, over the 162 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Google Cloud was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Amazon Web Services138 of 16259Not in the top three
Microsoft Azure103 of 16224Not in the top three
DigitalOcean73 of 16219Not in the top three
Akamai Connected Cloud53 of 1623Not in the top three
Vultr39 of 1622Not in the top three
Azure37 of 1622Not in the top three
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure37 of 1622Not in the top three
Hetzner22 of 1626Not in the top three
IBM22 of 1620Not in the top three
Cloudways17 of 1625Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Google Cloud. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 114 of the 162 answers that named Google Cloud and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

geekflare.com37
digitalocean.com33
techradar.com29
hostingadvice.com25
forbes.com24
atlantic.net20
aws.amazon.com19
worldmetrics.org19
cloud.google.comYour site18
pcmag.com18

224 of the 242 domain citations in answers naming Google Cloud came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Google Cloud

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Google Cloud; a claim can dispute any of them.
Google Cloud Platform (GCP) 22Google Cloud (GCP) 4Google 3Google Cloud / AWS / Azure 1Google Cloud Platform 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Google Cloud's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Google Cloud, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at google.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack