| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cloud hosting | Cloud and infrastructure | 0% | 15 of 85 | 12% | 26 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Load balancers | Network and edge | 0% | 40 of 94 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by HAProxy at 29% |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cloud hosting | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 13 → 15 of 85 |
| Load balancers | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 40 of 94, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Solid mid-tier options like Linode (Akamai), DigitalOcean, Vultr, and Liquid Web also maintain strong reputations” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Cloud hosting · negative prompt · alternative
“offer high-performance, developer-first Virtual Private Servers (VPS) with highly predictable pricing models” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Cloud hosting · comparative prompt · alternative
“Other options include Akamai Cloud Computing, Loadbalancer.org Enterprise ADC, and Cloudflare Load Balancing” Llama 4 Maverick · Load balancers · budget prompt · alternative
“Starting at $5/month ... Strong hardware performance (dedicated CPU options)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Cloud hosting · budget prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Has been described as the most unreliable with a UI and features that haven't evolved significantly, and poor customer service” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Cloud hosting · negative prompt · soft negative
“Avoid smaller ones like DO/Linode initially unless your IT team is small ... they suit startups better.” Grok 4.20 · Cloud hosting · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“They lack the deep compliance certifications (like HIPAA or advanced government clearances)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Cloud hosting · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 56 of the 68 answers that named Akamai Connected Cloud and are not a share of its labels.
146 of the 146 domain citations in answers naming Akamai Connected Cloud came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Akamai Connected Cloud's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: techdocs.akamai.com/cloud-computing/changelog/july-15-2025-akamai-cloud-pulse. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Akamai Connected Cloud's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Akamai Connected Cloud, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Akamai Connected Cloud by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: