| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cloud hosting | Cloud and infrastructure | 12% | 3 of 85 | 9% | 45 | accepted challenger | ▼−2Since September 2026: 13% → 12%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cloud hosting | 13% | 12% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 13% → 12%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 3 of 85, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 6 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 6 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 5 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“For most small businesses on a tight budget, DigitalOcean or Vultr at the $5–6/month tier offers the best balance” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Cloud hosting · budget prompt · first choice
“For most mid-market B2B companies, DigitalOcean or Vultr provide excellent value with simpler management” Kimi K2 · Cloud hosting · direct prompt · first choice
“Start with DigitalOcean ($4-6/month) if you want the easiest experience with room to grow” Kimi K2 · Cloud hosting · budget prompt · first choice
“My practical pick: DigitalOcean ... Best overall for a limited budget: DigitalOcean” GPT-5.4 mini · Cloud hosting · budget prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Budget cloud providers with limited features such as DigitalOcean or Vultr if you need advanced managed services” Perplexity Sonar · Cloud hosting · negative prompt · soft negative
“these are generally better suited to: Smaller teams (fewer managed services), Less demanding compliance requirements” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Cloud hosting · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“They lack the deep compliance certifications ... that large B2B clients often demand during security audits.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Cloud hosting · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“Avoid smaller ones like DO/Linode initially unless your IT team is small ... they suit startups better.” Grok 4.20 · Cloud hosting · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 105 of the 118 answers that named DigitalOcean Droplets and are not a share of its labels.
249 of the 297 domain citations in answers naming DigitalOcean Droplets came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What DigitalOcean Droplets's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: docs.digitalocean.com/products/droplets, docs.digitalocean.com/glossary/droplets, docs.digitalocean.com/products/gpu-droplets, marketplace.digitalocean.com/apps/droplet-nfs-server, docs.digitalocean.com/products/droplets/how-to. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when DigitalOcean Droplets's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as DigitalOcean Droplets, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for DigitalOcean Droplets by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
DigitalOcean Droplets is among the products AI models recommend first in Cloud hosting this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.