| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Extended detection and response | Security operations | 12% | 3 of 58 | 27% | 62 | criticized challenger | ▲+6Since September 2026: 5% → 11%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XDR | 5% | 11% | ▲+6Since September 2026: 5% → 11%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 4 → 3 of 58 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 5 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 6 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 6 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“CrowdStrike Falcon: Best for SMBs and mid-market organizations that want strong prevention-first endpoint protection with low system impact” Llama 4 Maverick · XDR · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“or CrowdStrike Falcon if you want best-in-class endpoint detection with flexibility. Both have strong B2B use cases” MiniMax M2.5 · XDR · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Microsoft Defender XDR for Microsoft-centric companies, otherwise CrowdStrike Falcon XDR.” GPT-5.4 mini · XDR · direct prompt · first choice
“CrowdStrike is widely considered the market leader in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR).” Qwen 3.7 Flash · XDR · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Avoid / be cautious if you have low tolerance for kernel-level risk, need predictable per-endpoint pricing, or have a junior SOC that can’t absorb a steep UI.” Muse Glimmer 30B · XDR · negative prompt · soft negative
“Do not buy a "DIY" XDR platform (like raw CrowdStrike Falcon or Palo Alto Cortex XDR) unless you have at least 2–3 dedicated, certified security analysts” Gemini 3.5 Flash · XDR · direct prompt · soft negative
“modular pricing accumulates quickly across the XDR surface and Falcon sensor deployment is required for full XDR data fidelity on endpoints.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · XDR · negative prompt · soft negative
“More expensive and less flexible on pricing for mid-market volumes... Better suited for enterprises with dedicated threat hunting teams” Kimi K2 · XDR · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 169 of the 178 answers that named CrowdStrike Falcon Insight XDR and are not a share of its labels.
633 of the 633 domain citations in answers naming CrowdStrike Falcon Insight XDR came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What CrowdStrike Falcon Insight XDR's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: crowdstrike.com/tech-hub/endpoint-security/falcon-insight-xdr-walkthrough, crowdstrike.com/fr-fr/resources/videos/xdr-demo, crowdstrike.com/en-us/resources/videos/falcon-xdr-2, crowdstrike.com/en-gb/resources/data-sheets/falcon-insight-xdr, crowdstrike.com/en-au/resources/data-sheets/falcon-insight-xdr. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when CrowdStrike Falcon Insight XDR's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as CrowdStrike Falcon Insight XDR, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for CrowdStrike Falcon Insight XDR by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
CrowdStrike Falcon Insight XDR is among the products AI models recommend first in Extended detection and response this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.