Every category where a model named Trend Vision One for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Extended detection and response	Security operations	0%	17 of 61	24%	21	accepted challenger
Endpoint protection	IT operations and endpoint	0%	48 of 99	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Defender for Cloud at 22%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Trend Vision One yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Trend Vision One across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	1	2
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	2	0	3
Mistral Small	1	2	1	4
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	2	0	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	2	0	0	2
Kimi K2	1	1	1	3
GLM 4.7 FlashX	2	0	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct9 labelsNone

Paraphrase4 labelsNone

Comparative26 labelsNone

Budget-constrained6 labelsNone

Scale-constrained6 labelsNone

Negative15 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative66 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“"Open XDR" architectures (like Trend Micro Vision One or SentinelOne Singularity) often provide better integration value” Qwen 3.7 Flash · XDR · negative prompt · alternative

“Cloud-Native & Ease of Use. Trend Micro bridges the gap between traditional enterprise security and modern cloud needs” Qwen 3.7 Flash · XDR · comparative prompt · alternative

“Best for organizations looking for a broader cross-domain threat detection platform” GPT-5.4 mini · XDR · comparative prompt · alternative

“Best for email\u2011heavy environments: Trend Micro Vision One” GLM 4.7 FlashX · XDR · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“If you're looking for alternatives to Trend Micro, consider options like CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender XDR + Sentinel, Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR, SentinelOne Singularity, and others.” Llama 4 Maverick · XDR · negative prompt · soft negative

“buying a native XDR platform (such as those from ... Trend Micro ...) and then trying to feed it third-party logs through generic connectors” Mistral Small · XDR · negative prompt · soft negative

“Correlation quality trails Palo Alto and CrowdStrike; ... The credit model is genuinely hard to forecast” Claude Haiku 4.5 · XDR · negative prompt · soft negative

“robust, but reviewers mention complexity, false positives, and costly deployment effort” GPT-5.4 mini · XDR · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Trend Vision One, over the 66 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Trend Vision One was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Microsoft Defender XDR53 of 6621Not in the top three

SentinelOne Singularity49 of 662Not in the top three

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR47 of 6612Not in the top three

CrowdStrike Falcon28 of 665Not in the top three

Stellar Cyber28 of 663Not in the top three

Cisco XDR25 of 660Not in the top three

CrowdStrike Falcon XDR20 of 667Not in the top three

Trellix XDR19 of 660Not in the top three

Coro15 of 669Not in the top three

Sophos Intercept X14 of 660Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Trend Vision One. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 61 of the 66 answers that named Trend Vision One and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

gbhackers.com49

cyberpress.org45

cybersecuritynews.com39

paloaltonetworks.com35

decryptiondigest.com30

esecurityplanet.com29

gartner.com25

guideflow.com25

aimultiple.com18

forrester.com12

307 of the 307 domain citations in answers naming Trend Vision One came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

gbhackers.com/best-xdr-platforms-compared46

cyberpress.org/xdr-platforms-by-business-size43

cybersecuritynews.com/best-xdr-platforms34

decryptiondigest.com/blog/best-xdr-platforms-202628

esecurityplanet.com/products/xdr-security-solutions28

paloaltonetworks.com/cyberpedia/xdr-solutions27

guideflow.com/blog/xdr-platform23

gbhackers.com/best-managed-xdr-compared19

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Trend Vision One

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Trend Vision One; a claim can dispute any of them.

Trend Micro Vision One 15Trend Micro 5Trend Micro XDR 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Trend Vision One's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Trend Vision One, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at trendvisionone.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.