Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 40 → 47 of 55
5 categories · RankedTrend Vision One
100Judge labels
0First choices
17Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
5Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in XDR for mid-market buyers
Rank 15 of 58 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 14% of its 21 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Trend Vision One →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business60 of 62
0%12 labels
criticized challenger
Mid-market15 of 58
0%21 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise10 of 58
0%30 labels
accepted challenger
In xdr · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Trend Vision One for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Extended detection and response | Security operations | 0% | 15 of 58 | 14% | 21 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Network detection and response | Security operations | 0% | 22 of 102 | 0% | 8 | under 10 labels · led by ManageEngine NetFlow Analyzer at 21% | |
| Endpoint protection | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 21 of 86 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Defender for Endpoint at 22% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Attack surface management | Security operations | 0% | 64 of 100 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Intruder at 49% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Cloud-native application protection | Cloud and infrastructure | 0% | 58 of 70 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Wiz at 37% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Trend Vision One held within the floor in all five categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · XDR · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 15 → 14 of 53
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 8 → 10 of 46
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XDR | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 15 of 58, unchanged |
| NDR | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 22 of 102, unchanged |
| Endpoint protection | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 32 → 21 of 86 |
| ASM | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 64 of 100, unchanged |
| CNAPP | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 58 of 70, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Trend Vision One across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Trend Vision One across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 7 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 6 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct15 labelsNone
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative47 labelsNone
Budget-constrained6 labelsNone
Scale-constrained10 labelsNone
Negative20 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative100 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Choose Trend Micro if your biggest blind spots lie in your email servers, legacy networks, or OT environments” Gemini 3.5 Flash · XDR · comparative prompt · alternative
“Best for: Large enterprises (named Leader in Gartner MQ for EPP 18 consecutive times)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Endpoint protection · comparative prompt · alternative
“Consider it for hybrid estates or organizations seeking broader Trend Micro coverage.” GPT-6 Luna · Endpoint protection · comparative prompt · alternative
“Best For: Organizations with significant virtualized infrastructure, containers” Qwen 3.7 Flash · XDR · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Caution based on independent testing... all test incidents ended as "Not mitigated" in some configurations” DeepSeek V4 Flash · XDR · negative prompt · soft negative
“Can suffer from pipeline bugs that hide blocked threats.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · XDR · negative prompt · soft negative
“Noted for learning curve complexities” MiniMax M2.5 · XDR · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Trend Vision One, over the 99 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Trend Vision One was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Trend Vision One, over the 99 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Trend Vision One was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Trend Vision One. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 94 of the 99 answers that named Trend Vision One and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
expertinsights.com47
paloaltonetworks.com44
gartner.com39
aimultiple.com34
g2.com33
guideflow.com33
sentinelone.com32
coruzant.com28
gbhackers.com26
cybersecuritynews.com24
340 of the 340 domain citations in answers naming Trend Vision One came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
trendmicro.com ranks 7 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Trend Vision One takes 0% of first choices and Microsoft Defender XDR takes 40%.ShowHide
Search and answers
trendmicro.com ranks 7 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Trend Vision One takes 0% of first choices and Microsoft Defender XDR takes 40%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “xdr platform”
7
Position for “xdr platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 320 a month (“trend vision one”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 18 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 588,295 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 40,201 · 2,030 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 77,134
- Paid Google search
- 1 searches its ads show for, about 4 clicks and $541 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 15 of 58 in XDR
Segment leader
40%
Microsoft Defender XDR
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 99 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 94 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on trendmicro.com
11,265
subdomains included
Content
3,315
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
258 · 271
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Report or ebook | 1,806 | 8 | 2026-09-25 | XDR, ASM | |
| News or press | 978 | undated | XDR, ASM | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 243 | 0 | 2022-10-19 | ASM, CNAPP | |
| Blog | 158 | 0 | 2026-01-05 | ||
| Case study | 107 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 12 | undated | EDR, XDR | ||
| Conference or event | 7 | 0 | 2025-01-13 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 4 | 0 | 2023-02-01 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-25Safely securing ai agents report or ebook
- 2026-07-29Tracking fake sites in the 2026 world cup scam wave report or ebook
- 2026-07-24Autonomous ransomware report or ebook
- 2026-07-23Tech support scams targeting japan report or ebook
- 2026-07-23Plc exploitation report or ebook
- 2026-07-22Device code phishing report or ebook
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page trendmicro.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Trend Vision One
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Trend Vision One; a claim can dispute any of them.
Trend Micro Vision One 16Trend Micro 14Trend Micro XDR 2
Follow Trend Vision One
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Trend Vision One is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Trend Vision One is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI Fearlessly.
- For
- enterprise organizations
- Free plan or trial
- Claim your 30-day trial trendmicro.com
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers
What Trend Vision One's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: trendmicro.com, trendmicro.com/pl_pl/compliance/nis2-dyrektywa.html, trendmicro.com/ja_jp/small-business/platform.html. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Trend Vision One's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Trend Vision One, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Trend Vision One by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Trend Vision One is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Trend Vision One, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.