| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cloud-native application protection | Cloud and infrastructure | 0% | 15 of 70 | 17% | 24 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Cloud security posture management | Cloud and infrastructure | 0% | 13 of 80 | 17% | 18 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Container and Kubernetes security | Cloud and infrastructure | 0% | 39 of 77 | 25% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Trivy at 22% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Application security posture management | Developer platform | 0% | 61 of 70 | 50% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Aikido Security at 37% | |
| AI security platforms | Security operations | 0% | 91 of 233 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by SentinelOne Singularity at 11% | |
| Data security posture management | Security operations | 0% | 44 of 105 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Purview at 18% |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNAPP | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 9 → 15 of 70 |
| CSPM | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 10 → 13 of 80 |
| Container security | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 18 → 39 of 77 |
| ASPM | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 61 of 70, unchanged |
| AI security | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 91 of 233, unchanged |
| DSPM | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 44 of 105, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 9 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 7 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 5 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 7 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“run a proof of concept (POC) with 2–3 top contenders (Wiz, Prisma Cloud, CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · CNAPP · negative prompt · first choice
“If you already use CrowdStrike for endpoints and want unified protection: CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud fits.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Container security · comparative prompt · alternative
“Differentiates through cloud workload protection plus endpoint and identity detection integration.” Perplexity Sonar · CNAPP · comparative prompt · alternative
“Choose CrowdStrike if you want unified endpoint + cloud security with strong runtime protection” Kimi K2 · CNAPP · comparative prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Avoid These for Mid-Market ... pricing scales aggressively, making it less practical as a standalone cloud security play” Gemini 3.5 Flash · CNAPP · direct prompt · hard negative
“What to Avoid on a Tight Budget... quote-only and target mid-market to enterprise budgets” Kimi K2 · CSPM · budget prompt · hard negative
“Users find CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security to be expensive, particularly challenging for small businesses with budget constraints, and face issues with alert fatigue and response lag.” Muse Glimmer 30B · ASPM · negative prompt · soft negative
“doesn't strongly differentiate from competitors on CSPM-specific features, and some users mention that alert response times lag approximately one minute” Claude Haiku 4.5 · CSPM · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 155 of the 159 answers that named CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security and are not a share of its labels.
568 of the 568 domain citations in answers naming CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: crowdstrike.com/resources/demos/falcon-container-security, crowdstrike.com/resources/demos/falcon-cloud-workload-protection, crowdstrike.com/de-de/platform/cloud-security/cspm, crowdstrike.com/de-de/platform/cloud-security/cnapp, crowdstrike.com/es-latam/platform/cloud-security/cspm. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: