AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › CrowdStrike Adaptive Shield · October 2026 Edition
CrowdStrike · 1 category · Named, not ranked

CrowdStrike Adaptive Shield

4Judge labels
1First choices
0Negative labels
3 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. CrowdStrike Adaptive Shield was named 1 time in SSPM, where Wing Security led with 30%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In sspm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named CrowdStrike Adaptive Shield for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
SaaS security posture managementSecurity operations0%38 of 950%1under 10 labels · led by Wing Security at 30%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for CrowdStrike Adaptive Shield yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated CrowdStrike Adaptive Shield across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B01001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 label1
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative4 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Described as Dedicated SSPM and ITDR: SaaS misconfiguration, identity risk, and threat detection.” Muse Glimmer 30B · SSPM · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as CrowdStrike Adaptive Shield, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and CrowdStrike Adaptive Shield was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
AppOmni3 of 42Not among the top eight
Obsidian2 of 40Not among the top eight
Balbix1 of 40Not among the top eight
Drift Security1 of 40Not among the top eight
Grip Security1 of 40Not among the top eight
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps1 of 40Not among the top eight
Netskope SSPM1 of 40Not among the top eight
Obsidian Security1 of 40Not among the top eight
Orca Security1 of 40Not among the top eight
Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud1 of 40Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named CrowdStrike Adaptive Shield. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 4 answers that named CrowdStrike Adaptive Shield and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

guideflow.com4
cyberpress.org3
cybersecuritynews.com3
g2.com3
devopsschool.com2
docontrol.io2
gbhackers.com2
guptadeepak.com2
nudgesecurity.com2
peerspot.com2

Twenty-five of the twenty-five domain citations in answers naming CrowdStrike Adaptive Shield came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Follow CrowdStrike Adaptive Shield

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

CrowdStrike is the company behind CrowdStrike Adaptive Shield.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Blocca le compromissioni SaaS
Price stated
Sans obligation d'achat. Sans engagement. crowdstrike.com/fr-fr/products/trials/try-falcon-shield
Free plan or trial
Prova la sicurezza SaaS gratuitamente per 15 giorni crowdstrike.com/it-it/platform/falcon-shield
Customers named
People First BankDoctolibSchrödingerSchrodinger
Not stated on the pages read
Starting price, certifications, hosting

What CrowdStrike Adaptive Shield's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: crowdstrike.com/it-it/platform/falcon-shield, crowdstrike.com/es-latam/platform/falcon-shield, crowdstrike.com/fr-fr/products/trials/try-falcon-shield, crowdstrike.com/es-es/platform/falcon-shield/integrations, crowdstrike.com/es-latam/products/trials/try-falcon-shield. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when CrowdStrike Adaptive Shield's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as CrowdStrike Adaptive Shield, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for CrowdStrike Adaptive Shield by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where CrowdStrike Adaptive Shield is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name CrowdStrike Adaptive Shield, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at crowdstrike.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.