AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › CrowdStrike Charlotte AI · October 2026 Edition
CrowdStrike · 1 category · Ranked

CrowdStrike Charlotte AI

52Judge labels
2First choices
5Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
4% in AI SOC agents for enterprise buyers
Rank 25 of 104 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 14 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of CrowdStrike Charlotte AI →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In ai soc agents · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named CrowdStrike Charlotte AI for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
AI SOC agentsSecurity operations0%25 of 1040%14accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for CrowdStrike Charlotte AI yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated CrowdStrike Charlotte AI across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini01001
Gemini 3.5 Flash00101
Perplexity Sonar01001
Grok 4.1 Fast02204
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash01001
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200101
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500202
GPT-6 Luna02002
Muse Glimmer 30B01001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct5 labels1
Paraphrase9 labels1
Comparative22 labelsNone
Budget-constrained6 labelsNone
Scale-constrained4 labelsNone
Negative6 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative52 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Strong for teams already standardized on CrowdStrike and looking for analyst assistance inside that ecosystem.” Perplexity Sonar · AI SOC agents · comparative prompt · alternative
“cited alongside Microsoft Security Copilot as the platform choice for teams standardized on a major platform” Muse Glimmer 30B · AI SOC agents · comparative prompt · alternative
“If you already run a major security platform, evaluate its native agent first—Charlotte AI...” GPT-6 Luna · AI SOC agents · comparative prompt · alternative
“Integrated with Falcon platform; excels in endpoint/threat hunting for CrowdStrike users.” Grok 4.1 Fast · AI SOC agents · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as CrowdStrike Charlotte AI, over the 52 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and CrowdStrike Charlotte AI was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Dropzone AI35 of 5211Not among the top eight
Microsoft Security Copilot30 of 522Not among the top eight
SentinelOne Purple AI24 of 520Not among the top eight
Intezer AI SOC22 of 522Not among the top eight
Torq21 of 522Not among the top eight
Prophet Security20 of 526Not among the top eight
Radiant Security12 of 524Not among the top eight
Google Security Operations12 of 520Not among the top eight
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSIAM10 of 521Not among the top eight
Palo Alto Cortex AgentiX9 of 520Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named CrowdStrike Charlotte AI. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 52 of the 52 answers that named CrowdStrike Charlotte AI and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

underdefense.com40
intezer.com32
resources.rework.com25
paloaltonetworks.com23
securityboulevard.com21
swimlane.com21
prophetsecurity.ai18
g2.com16
d3security.com15
dropzone.ai13

224 of the 224 domain citations in answers naming CrowdStrike Charlotte AI came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where CrowdStrike Charlotte AI stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Searches for its name, Google
260 a month (“crowdstrike charlotte ai”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
6 a month
Its own site
It sits on CrowdStrike's site (crowdstrike.com), so there are no site figures for it alone

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 25 of 104 in AI SOC agents
Segment leader
24%
Dropzone AI
First choices
2 across its categories
Named in
52 answers
Its own site cited
in 52 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Names read as CrowdStrike Charlotte AI

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as CrowdStrike Charlotte AI; a claim can dispute any of them.
CrowdStrike Charlotte AI / Falcon Next-Gen SIEM agentic SOAR 1

Follow CrowdStrike Charlotte AI

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

CrowdStrike is the company behind CrowdStrike Charlotte AI.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Accelerate outcomes with autonomous intelligence fueled by world-class expertise.
For
Sicherheitsteams; das moderne SOC
Price stated
Berechtigte CrowdStrike-Kunden können über die CrowdStrike Falcon®-Konsole kostenlos auf Charlotte AI zugreifen und erhalten dafür 50 KI-Credits, die jeden Monat erneuert werden. crowdstrike.com/de-de/platform/charlotte-ai
Free plan or trial
Berechtigte CrowdStrike-Kunden können über die CrowdStrike Falcon®-Konsole kostenlos auf Charlotte AI zugreifen und erhalten dafür 50 KI-Credits, die jeden Monat erneuert werden. Testen Sie CrowdStrike 15 Tage kostenlos. crowdstrike.com/de-de/platform/charlotte-ai
Certifications
ISO 42001ISO/IEC 42001:2023
Customers named
MondelezBlackbaudUniversidad Europea de MadridGreen Thumb Industries
Not stated on the pages read
Starting price, integrations, hosting

What CrowdStrike Charlotte AI's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: crowdstrike.com/tech-hub/charlotte-ai, crowdstrike.com/de-de/platform/charlotte-ai, crowdstrike.com/es-latam/platform/charlotte-ai, crowdstrike.com/es-latam/solutions/charlotte-agentic-soar, crowdstrike.com/en-us/resources/data-sheets/charlotte-ai. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when CrowdStrike Charlotte AI's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as CrowdStrike Charlotte AI, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for CrowdStrike Charlotte AI by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where CrowdStrike Charlotte AI is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name CrowdStrike Charlotte AI, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at crowdstrike.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.