| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Digital risk protection | Security operations | 4% | 8 of 86 | 0% | 9 | under 10 labels · led by UpGuard BreachSight at 22% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“The best digital risk protection platform for a mid-market B2B company is Fortra Brand Protection” Llama 4 Maverick · DRP · direct prompt · first choice
“My default pick would be Fortra Brand Protection (the former PhishLabs service)” GPT-6 Luna · DRP · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Consider managed services like Fortra or Netcraft for hands-off needs.” Grok 4.1 Fast · DRP · negative prompt · alternative
“worth considering as a potentially more cost-effective alternative” MiniMax M2.5 · DRP · paraphrase prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 25 of the 25 answers that named Fortra Brand Protection and are not a share of its labels.
110 of the 118 domain citations in answers naming Fortra Brand Protection came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Fortra Brand Protection's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: fortra.com/platform/brand-protection, fortra.com/lp/brand-protection-for-financial-services, fortra.com/platform/brand-protection/demo, fortra.com/platform/brand-protection/quote, fortra.com/platform/brand-protection/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Fortra Brand Protection's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Fortra Brand Protection, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Fortra Brand Protection by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: