5 categories · RankedChatGPT
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise AI assistants | Data platform | 25% | 1 of 145 | 21% | 47 | accepted challenger | |
| AI coding assistants | Developer platform | 0% | 41 of 48 | 50% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by GitHub Copilot at 75% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| ML platforms | Data platform | 0% | 102 of 107 | 67% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Azure Machine Learning at 21% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| AI governance platforms | Data platform | 0% | 37 of 135 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Credo AI at 18% | |
| AI security platforms | Security operations | 0% | 212 of 233 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by SentinelOne Singularity at 11% |
Movement
By model
How each model treated ChatGPT across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| Grok 4.20 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| Mistral Small | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 7 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“ChatGPT Enterprise - extends OpenAI's chatbot with higher-speed access, longer context windows, and enterprise controls like single sign-on (SSO) and admin consoles” Llama 4 Maverick · Enterprise AI · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“ChatGPT Business remains the most balanced option for customer support drafting, creative brainstorming, and general workflow acceleration.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Enterprise AI · budget prompt · first choice
“My default recommendation for a mid-sized B2B company is ChatGPT Enterprise because it is the most versatile company-wide assistant” Perplexity Sonar · Enterprise AI · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“ChatGPT Business at $20/seat/mo annual is commonly cited as the best general-purpose pick for small/medium businesses” Muse Glimmer 30B · Enterprise AI · budget prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Consumer-grade AI platforms like free/public ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude, as they do not meet enterprise AI compliance requirements” Llama 4 Maverick · AI security · negative prompt · hard negative
“Multiple major companies have banned it after data leaks” MiniMax M2.5 · Enterprise AI · negative prompt · hard negative
“several major enterprise platforms—including ChatGPT Enterprise, Gemini Enterprise, and Salesforce Einstein—can be tricked into leaking data” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Enterprise AI · negative prompt · soft negative
“tools that look like consumer ChatGPT/Claude/Gemini-style accounts but are used in a company setting without enterprise controls” Perplexity Sonar · Enterprise AI · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as ChatGPT, over the 199 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ChatGPT was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 193 of the 199 answers that named ChatGPT and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
401 of the 401 domain citations in answers naming ChatGPT came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
Where ChatGPT stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.ShowHide
Search and answers
In search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 124,000,000 a month (“chatgpt”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 218,639 a month
In answers
This edition- Named in
- 199 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 193 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as ChatGPT
Follow ChatGPT
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ChatGPT's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ChatGPT, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for ChatGPT by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where ChatGPT is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name ChatGPT, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where ChatGPT is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.ShowHide
Badges
AI models recommend ChatGPT first in Enterprise AI assistants this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.